Predictors of Hiatal Hernia Recurrence After Laparoscopic Anti-reflux Surgery with Hiatal Hernia Repair: a Prospective Database Analysis

Priscila R. Armijo, Bhavani Pokala, Mitchel Misfeldt, Spyridon Pagkratis, Dmitry Oleynikov

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to identify factors that can predict hiatal hernia recurrence (HHR) in patients after anti-reflux surgery with hiatal hernia (HH) repair. Methods: A single-institution, prospectively collected database was reviewed (January 2002–October 2015) with inclusion criteria of GERD and laparoscopic anti-reflux (AR) surgery with HH repair. Demographics, esophageal symptom scores, and pre- and post-upper gastrointestinal imaging (UGI) were collected. Mesh usage, HH type (sliding, paraesophageal (HH) or type IV), and size were evaluated, and patients who had HHR versus those who did not (NHHR) were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS v.23.0.0, with α = 0.05. Results: Three hundred twenty-two patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 56.9 ± 14.8 years (60.9% female), and mean follow-up was 19.9 ± 23.8 months. 88.2% underwent total fundoplication and 11.8% underwent partial fundoplication. HHR rate was 15.5%. HHR patients had larger HH than the NHHR group. There was no significant difference between groups for age, gender, BMI, race, and mesh usage. Only 3 patients (10.3%) with HHR reported mild-to-moderate heartburn, regurgitation, and solid or liquid dysphagia at 12-month follow-up. Overall reoperation rate was 1% in this population. Conclusions: HHR is correlated with large hernia size. Mesh use and patient BMI were not predictors, and no correlation was identified between HHR and presence of GERD symptoms. Recurrence after repair is not uncommon, but is asymptomatic in most cases. Reoperation is rare and mesh is not routinely needed. Large asymptomatic HHs in the elderly often do not require intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)696-701
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 15 2019

Fingerprint

Hiatal Hernia
Herniorrhaphy
Databases
Recurrence
Fundoplication
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Reoperation
Heartburn
Deglutition Disorders
Hernia
Age Groups

Keywords

  • Body mass index
  • Hiatal hernia repair
  • Mesh
  • Predictors of recurrence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Predictors of Hiatal Hernia Recurrence After Laparoscopic Anti-reflux Surgery with Hiatal Hernia Repair : a Prospective Database Analysis. / Armijo, Priscila R.; Pokala, Bhavani; Misfeldt, Mitchel; Pagkratis, Spyridon; Oleynikov, Dmitry.

In: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Vol. 23, No. 4, 15.04.2019, p. 696-701.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{a805ae591b5b40e89bfe5b31d948aa67,
title = "Predictors of Hiatal Hernia Recurrence After Laparoscopic Anti-reflux Surgery with Hiatal Hernia Repair: a Prospective Database Analysis",
abstract = "Background: The aim of this study is to identify factors that can predict hiatal hernia recurrence (HHR) in patients after anti-reflux surgery with hiatal hernia (HH) repair. Methods: A single-institution, prospectively collected database was reviewed (January 2002–October 2015) with inclusion criteria of GERD and laparoscopic anti-reflux (AR) surgery with HH repair. Demographics, esophageal symptom scores, and pre- and post-upper gastrointestinal imaging (UGI) were collected. Mesh usage, HH type (sliding, paraesophageal (HH) or type IV), and size were evaluated, and patients who had HHR versus those who did not (NHHR) were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS v.23.0.0, with α = 0.05. Results: Three hundred twenty-two patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 56.9 ± 14.8 years (60.9{\%} female), and mean follow-up was 19.9 ± 23.8 months. 88.2{\%} underwent total fundoplication and 11.8{\%} underwent partial fundoplication. HHR rate was 15.5{\%}. HHR patients had larger HH than the NHHR group. There was no significant difference between groups for age, gender, BMI, race, and mesh usage. Only 3 patients (10.3{\%}) with HHR reported mild-to-moderate heartburn, regurgitation, and solid or liquid dysphagia at 12-month follow-up. Overall reoperation rate was 1{\%} in this population. Conclusions: HHR is correlated with large hernia size. Mesh use and patient BMI were not predictors, and no correlation was identified between HHR and presence of GERD symptoms. Recurrence after repair is not uncommon, but is asymptomatic in most cases. Reoperation is rare and mesh is not routinely needed. Large asymptomatic HHs in the elderly often do not require intervention.",
keywords = "Body mass index, Hiatal hernia repair, Mesh, Predictors of recurrence",
author = "Armijo, {Priscila R.} and Bhavani Pokala and Mitchel Misfeldt and Spyridon Pagkratis and Dmitry Oleynikov",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1007/s11605-018-04073-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "696--701",
journal = "Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery",
issn = "1091-255X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictors of Hiatal Hernia Recurrence After Laparoscopic Anti-reflux Surgery with Hiatal Hernia Repair

T2 - a Prospective Database Analysis

AU - Armijo, Priscila R.

AU - Pokala, Bhavani

AU - Misfeldt, Mitchel

AU - Pagkratis, Spyridon

AU - Oleynikov, Dmitry

PY - 2019/4/15

Y1 - 2019/4/15

N2 - Background: The aim of this study is to identify factors that can predict hiatal hernia recurrence (HHR) in patients after anti-reflux surgery with hiatal hernia (HH) repair. Methods: A single-institution, prospectively collected database was reviewed (January 2002–October 2015) with inclusion criteria of GERD and laparoscopic anti-reflux (AR) surgery with HH repair. Demographics, esophageal symptom scores, and pre- and post-upper gastrointestinal imaging (UGI) were collected. Mesh usage, HH type (sliding, paraesophageal (HH) or type IV), and size were evaluated, and patients who had HHR versus those who did not (NHHR) were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS v.23.0.0, with α = 0.05. Results: Three hundred twenty-two patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 56.9 ± 14.8 years (60.9% female), and mean follow-up was 19.9 ± 23.8 months. 88.2% underwent total fundoplication and 11.8% underwent partial fundoplication. HHR rate was 15.5%. HHR patients had larger HH than the NHHR group. There was no significant difference between groups for age, gender, BMI, race, and mesh usage. Only 3 patients (10.3%) with HHR reported mild-to-moderate heartburn, regurgitation, and solid or liquid dysphagia at 12-month follow-up. Overall reoperation rate was 1% in this population. Conclusions: HHR is correlated with large hernia size. Mesh use and patient BMI were not predictors, and no correlation was identified between HHR and presence of GERD symptoms. Recurrence after repair is not uncommon, but is asymptomatic in most cases. Reoperation is rare and mesh is not routinely needed. Large asymptomatic HHs in the elderly often do not require intervention.

AB - Background: The aim of this study is to identify factors that can predict hiatal hernia recurrence (HHR) in patients after anti-reflux surgery with hiatal hernia (HH) repair. Methods: A single-institution, prospectively collected database was reviewed (January 2002–October 2015) with inclusion criteria of GERD and laparoscopic anti-reflux (AR) surgery with HH repair. Demographics, esophageal symptom scores, and pre- and post-upper gastrointestinal imaging (UGI) were collected. Mesh usage, HH type (sliding, paraesophageal (HH) or type IV), and size were evaluated, and patients who had HHR versus those who did not (NHHR) were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS v.23.0.0, with α = 0.05. Results: Three hundred twenty-two patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 56.9 ± 14.8 years (60.9% female), and mean follow-up was 19.9 ± 23.8 months. 88.2% underwent total fundoplication and 11.8% underwent partial fundoplication. HHR rate was 15.5%. HHR patients had larger HH than the NHHR group. There was no significant difference between groups for age, gender, BMI, race, and mesh usage. Only 3 patients (10.3%) with HHR reported mild-to-moderate heartburn, regurgitation, and solid or liquid dysphagia at 12-month follow-up. Overall reoperation rate was 1% in this population. Conclusions: HHR is correlated with large hernia size. Mesh use and patient BMI were not predictors, and no correlation was identified between HHR and presence of GERD symptoms. Recurrence after repair is not uncommon, but is asymptomatic in most cases. Reoperation is rare and mesh is not routinely needed. Large asymptomatic HHs in the elderly often do not require intervention.

KW - Body mass index

KW - Hiatal hernia repair

KW - Mesh

KW - Predictors of recurrence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059664411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059664411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11605-018-04073-0

DO - 10.1007/s11605-018-04073-0

M3 - Review article

C2 - 30617774

AN - SCOPUS:85059664411

VL - 23

SP - 696

EP - 701

JO - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

JF - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

SN - 1091-255X

IS - 4

ER -