Predictors and moderators of acute outcome in the Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS)

John Curry, Paul Rohde, Anne Simons, Susan Silva, Benedetto Vitiello, Christopher J Kratochvil, Mark Reinecke, Norah Feeny, Karen Wells, Sanjeev Pathak, Elizabeth Weller, David Rosenberg, Betsy Kennard, Michele Robins, Golda Ginsburg, John March

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

255 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors and moderators of response to acute treatments among depressed adolescents (N = 439) randomly assigned to fluoxetine, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), both fluoxetine and CBT, or clinical management with pill placebo in the Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS). METHOD: Potential baseline predictors and moderators were identified by a literature review. The outcome measure was a week 12 predicted score derived from the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R). For each candidate moderator or predictor, a general linear model was conducted to examine main and interactive effects of treatment and the candidate variable on the CDRS-R predicted scores. RESULTS: Adolescents who were younger, less chronically depressed, higher functioning, and less hopeless with less suicidal ideation, fewer melancholic features or comorbid diagnoses, and greater expectations for improvement were more likely to benefit acutely than their counterparts. Combined treatment, under no condition less effective than monotherapy, was more effective than fluoxetine for mild to moderate depression and for depression with high levels of cognitive distortion, but not for severe depression or depression with low levels of cognitive distortion. Adolescents from high-income families were as likely to benefit from CBT alone as from combined treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Younger and less severely impaired adolescents are likely to respond better to acute treatment than older, more impaired, or multiply comorbid adolescents. Family income level, cognitive distortions, and severity of depression may help clinicians to choose among acute interventions, but combined treatment proved robust in the presence of moderators. Copyright 2006

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1427-1439
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Volume45
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2006

Fingerprint

Depression
Fluoxetine
Cognitive Therapy
Therapeutics
Suicidal Ideation
Linear Models
Placebos
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy
  • Fluoxetine
  • Major depression
  • Moderators
  • Predictors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Predictors and moderators of acute outcome in the Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS). / Curry, John; Rohde, Paul; Simons, Anne; Silva, Susan; Vitiello, Benedetto; Kratochvil, Christopher J; Reinecke, Mark; Feeny, Norah; Wells, Karen; Pathak, Sanjeev; Weller, Elizabeth; Rosenberg, David; Kennard, Betsy; Robins, Michele; Ginsburg, Golda; March, John.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Vol. 45, No. 12, 01.12.2006, p. 1427-1439.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Curry, J, Rohde, P, Simons, A, Silva, S, Vitiello, B, Kratochvil, CJ, Reinecke, M, Feeny, N, Wells, K, Pathak, S, Weller, E, Rosenberg, D, Kennard, B, Robins, M, Ginsburg, G & March, J 2006, 'Predictors and moderators of acute outcome in the Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS)', Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 1427-1439. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.chi.0000240838.78984.e2
Curry, John ; Rohde, Paul ; Simons, Anne ; Silva, Susan ; Vitiello, Benedetto ; Kratochvil, Christopher J ; Reinecke, Mark ; Feeny, Norah ; Wells, Karen ; Pathak, Sanjeev ; Weller, Elizabeth ; Rosenberg, David ; Kennard, Betsy ; Robins, Michele ; Ginsburg, Golda ; March, John. / Predictors and moderators of acute outcome in the Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS). In: Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2006 ; Vol. 45, No. 12. pp. 1427-1439.
@article{af5541bc6f444873b9a527205ca6bf30,
title = "Predictors and moderators of acute outcome in the Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS)",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors and moderators of response to acute treatments among depressed adolescents (N = 439) randomly assigned to fluoxetine, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), both fluoxetine and CBT, or clinical management with pill placebo in the Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS). METHOD: Potential baseline predictors and moderators were identified by a literature review. The outcome measure was a week 12 predicted score derived from the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R). For each candidate moderator or predictor, a general linear model was conducted to examine main and interactive effects of treatment and the candidate variable on the CDRS-R predicted scores. RESULTS: Adolescents who were younger, less chronically depressed, higher functioning, and less hopeless with less suicidal ideation, fewer melancholic features or comorbid diagnoses, and greater expectations for improvement were more likely to benefit acutely than their counterparts. Combined treatment, under no condition less effective than monotherapy, was more effective than fluoxetine for mild to moderate depression and for depression with high levels of cognitive distortion, but not for severe depression or depression with low levels of cognitive distortion. Adolescents from high-income families were as likely to benefit from CBT alone as from combined treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Younger and less severely impaired adolescents are likely to respond better to acute treatment than older, more impaired, or multiply comorbid adolescents. Family income level, cognitive distortions, and severity of depression may help clinicians to choose among acute interventions, but combined treatment proved robust in the presence of moderators. Copyright 2006",
keywords = "Cognitive-behavioral therapy, Fluoxetine, Major depression, Moderators, Predictors",
author = "John Curry and Paul Rohde and Anne Simons and Susan Silva and Benedetto Vitiello and Kratochvil, {Christopher J} and Mark Reinecke and Norah Feeny and Karen Wells and Sanjeev Pathak and Elizabeth Weller and David Rosenberg and Betsy Kennard and Michele Robins and Golda Ginsburg and John March",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.chi.0000240838.78984.e2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "1427--1439",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry",
issn = "0890-8567",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictors and moderators of acute outcome in the Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS)

AU - Curry, John

AU - Rohde, Paul

AU - Simons, Anne

AU - Silva, Susan

AU - Vitiello, Benedetto

AU - Kratochvil, Christopher J

AU - Reinecke, Mark

AU - Feeny, Norah

AU - Wells, Karen

AU - Pathak, Sanjeev

AU - Weller, Elizabeth

AU - Rosenberg, David

AU - Kennard, Betsy

AU - Robins, Michele

AU - Ginsburg, Golda

AU - March, John

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors and moderators of response to acute treatments among depressed adolescents (N = 439) randomly assigned to fluoxetine, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), both fluoxetine and CBT, or clinical management with pill placebo in the Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS). METHOD: Potential baseline predictors and moderators were identified by a literature review. The outcome measure was a week 12 predicted score derived from the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R). For each candidate moderator or predictor, a general linear model was conducted to examine main and interactive effects of treatment and the candidate variable on the CDRS-R predicted scores. RESULTS: Adolescents who were younger, less chronically depressed, higher functioning, and less hopeless with less suicidal ideation, fewer melancholic features or comorbid diagnoses, and greater expectations for improvement were more likely to benefit acutely than their counterparts. Combined treatment, under no condition less effective than monotherapy, was more effective than fluoxetine for mild to moderate depression and for depression with high levels of cognitive distortion, but not for severe depression or depression with low levels of cognitive distortion. Adolescents from high-income families were as likely to benefit from CBT alone as from combined treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Younger and less severely impaired adolescents are likely to respond better to acute treatment than older, more impaired, or multiply comorbid adolescents. Family income level, cognitive distortions, and severity of depression may help clinicians to choose among acute interventions, but combined treatment proved robust in the presence of moderators. Copyright 2006

AB - OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors and moderators of response to acute treatments among depressed adolescents (N = 439) randomly assigned to fluoxetine, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), both fluoxetine and CBT, or clinical management with pill placebo in the Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS). METHOD: Potential baseline predictors and moderators were identified by a literature review. The outcome measure was a week 12 predicted score derived from the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R). For each candidate moderator or predictor, a general linear model was conducted to examine main and interactive effects of treatment and the candidate variable on the CDRS-R predicted scores. RESULTS: Adolescents who were younger, less chronically depressed, higher functioning, and less hopeless with less suicidal ideation, fewer melancholic features or comorbid diagnoses, and greater expectations for improvement were more likely to benefit acutely than their counterparts. Combined treatment, under no condition less effective than monotherapy, was more effective than fluoxetine for mild to moderate depression and for depression with high levels of cognitive distortion, but not for severe depression or depression with low levels of cognitive distortion. Adolescents from high-income families were as likely to benefit from CBT alone as from combined treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Younger and less severely impaired adolescents are likely to respond better to acute treatment than older, more impaired, or multiply comorbid adolescents. Family income level, cognitive distortions, and severity of depression may help clinicians to choose among acute interventions, but combined treatment proved robust in the presence of moderators. Copyright 2006

KW - Cognitive-behavioral therapy

KW - Fluoxetine

KW - Major depression

KW - Moderators

KW - Predictors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845382298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845382298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.chi.0000240838.78984.e2

DO - 10.1097/01.chi.0000240838.78984.e2

M3 - Article

C2 - 17135988

AN - SCOPUS:33845382298

VL - 45

SP - 1427

EP - 1439

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

SN - 0890-8567

IS - 12

ER -