Predictive validity of neuropsychiatric subgroups on nursing home placement and survival in patients with alzheimer disease

Saw Myo Tun, Daniel L Murman, Heidi L. Long, Christopher C. Colenda, Alexander Von Eye

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to conceptualize neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with Alzheimer disease as distinct symptom profiles with differential disease outcomes. Two outcomes of interest in the study were nursing home placement and survival. Method: Cluster analysis was used to categorize 122 patients with Alzheimer disease based on their neuropsychiatric symptoms as assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. Both the presence as well as the severity and frequency of symptoms were considered. After identification of the subgroups, the predictive validity of the categorization was tested on time to nursing home placement and time to death over a three-year period. Cox proportional hazard models were used to perform survival analysis. Important covariates such as severity of cognitive and functional impairments, comorbid medical conditions, presence of parkinsonism, and marital status were adjusted at baseline. Results: Based on the presence of neuropsychiatric symptoms, three subgroups were identified: minimally symptomatic, highly symptomatic, and affective/apathetic. Over a three-year period, the highly symptomatic group had an increased risk of nursing home placement. In addition, the rates of survival were significantly lower for the highly symptomatic and the affective/apathetic subgroups. Based on the severity and frequency of symptoms, two-cluster and four-cluster solutions were produced. The groupings based on severity and frequency of symptoms predicted significant differential outcomes in survival and nursing home placement. Conclusions: Neuropsychiatric subgroups were able to predict differential outcomes and identify those with an increased risk for a worse prognosis. The findings were discussed through their research and clinical implications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)314-327
Number of pages14
JournalAmerican Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2007

Fingerprint

Nursing Homes
Alzheimer Disease
Survival
Marital Status
Parkinsonian Disorders
Survival Analysis
Proportional Hazards Models
Cluster Analysis
Survival Rate
Equipment and Supplies
Research

Keywords

  • Neuropsychiatric subgroups
  • Nursing home placement
  • Survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Predictive validity of neuropsychiatric subgroups on nursing home placement and survival in patients with alzheimer disease. / Tun, Saw Myo; Murman, Daniel L; Long, Heidi L.; Colenda, Christopher C.; Von Eye, Alexander.

In: American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Vol. 15, No. 4, 04.2007, p. 314-327.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tun, Saw Myo ; Murman, Daniel L ; Long, Heidi L. ; Colenda, Christopher C. ; Von Eye, Alexander. / Predictive validity of neuropsychiatric subgroups on nursing home placement and survival in patients with alzheimer disease. In: American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2007 ; Vol. 15, No. 4. pp. 314-327.
@article{84604750c28848ce9c641d371461278d,
title = "Predictive validity of neuropsychiatric subgroups on nursing home placement and survival in patients with alzheimer disease",
abstract = "Objective: The aim of the study was to conceptualize neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with Alzheimer disease as distinct symptom profiles with differential disease outcomes. Two outcomes of interest in the study were nursing home placement and survival. Method: Cluster analysis was used to categorize 122 patients with Alzheimer disease based on their neuropsychiatric symptoms as assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. Both the presence as well as the severity and frequency of symptoms were considered. After identification of the subgroups, the predictive validity of the categorization was tested on time to nursing home placement and time to death over a three-year period. Cox proportional hazard models were used to perform survival analysis. Important covariates such as severity of cognitive and functional impairments, comorbid medical conditions, presence of parkinsonism, and marital status were adjusted at baseline. Results: Based on the presence of neuropsychiatric symptoms, three subgroups were identified: minimally symptomatic, highly symptomatic, and affective/apathetic. Over a three-year period, the highly symptomatic group had an increased risk of nursing home placement. In addition, the rates of survival were significantly lower for the highly symptomatic and the affective/apathetic subgroups. Based on the severity and frequency of symptoms, two-cluster and four-cluster solutions were produced. The groupings based on severity and frequency of symptoms predicted significant differential outcomes in survival and nursing home placement. Conclusions: Neuropsychiatric subgroups were able to predict differential outcomes and identify those with an increased risk for a worse prognosis. The findings were discussed through their research and clinical implications.",
keywords = "Neuropsychiatric subgroups, Nursing home placement, Survival",
author = "Tun, {Saw Myo} and Murman, {Daniel L} and Long, {Heidi L.} and Colenda, {Christopher C.} and {Von Eye}, Alexander",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1097/01.JGP.0000239263.52621.97",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "314--327",
journal = "American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry",
issn = "1064-7481",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictive validity of neuropsychiatric subgroups on nursing home placement and survival in patients with alzheimer disease

AU - Tun, Saw Myo

AU - Murman, Daniel L

AU - Long, Heidi L.

AU - Colenda, Christopher C.

AU - Von Eye, Alexander

PY - 2007/4

Y1 - 2007/4

N2 - Objective: The aim of the study was to conceptualize neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with Alzheimer disease as distinct symptom profiles with differential disease outcomes. Two outcomes of interest in the study were nursing home placement and survival. Method: Cluster analysis was used to categorize 122 patients with Alzheimer disease based on their neuropsychiatric symptoms as assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. Both the presence as well as the severity and frequency of symptoms were considered. After identification of the subgroups, the predictive validity of the categorization was tested on time to nursing home placement and time to death over a three-year period. Cox proportional hazard models were used to perform survival analysis. Important covariates such as severity of cognitive and functional impairments, comorbid medical conditions, presence of parkinsonism, and marital status were adjusted at baseline. Results: Based on the presence of neuropsychiatric symptoms, three subgroups were identified: minimally symptomatic, highly symptomatic, and affective/apathetic. Over a three-year period, the highly symptomatic group had an increased risk of nursing home placement. In addition, the rates of survival were significantly lower for the highly symptomatic and the affective/apathetic subgroups. Based on the severity and frequency of symptoms, two-cluster and four-cluster solutions were produced. The groupings based on severity and frequency of symptoms predicted significant differential outcomes in survival and nursing home placement. Conclusions: Neuropsychiatric subgroups were able to predict differential outcomes and identify those with an increased risk for a worse prognosis. The findings were discussed through their research and clinical implications.

AB - Objective: The aim of the study was to conceptualize neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with Alzheimer disease as distinct symptom profiles with differential disease outcomes. Two outcomes of interest in the study were nursing home placement and survival. Method: Cluster analysis was used to categorize 122 patients with Alzheimer disease based on their neuropsychiatric symptoms as assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. Both the presence as well as the severity and frequency of symptoms were considered. After identification of the subgroups, the predictive validity of the categorization was tested on time to nursing home placement and time to death over a three-year period. Cox proportional hazard models were used to perform survival analysis. Important covariates such as severity of cognitive and functional impairments, comorbid medical conditions, presence of parkinsonism, and marital status were adjusted at baseline. Results: Based on the presence of neuropsychiatric symptoms, three subgroups were identified: minimally symptomatic, highly symptomatic, and affective/apathetic. Over a three-year period, the highly symptomatic group had an increased risk of nursing home placement. In addition, the rates of survival were significantly lower for the highly symptomatic and the affective/apathetic subgroups. Based on the severity and frequency of symptoms, two-cluster and four-cluster solutions were produced. The groupings based on severity and frequency of symptoms predicted significant differential outcomes in survival and nursing home placement. Conclusions: Neuropsychiatric subgroups were able to predict differential outcomes and identify those with an increased risk for a worse prognosis. The findings were discussed through their research and clinical implications.

KW - Neuropsychiatric subgroups

KW - Nursing home placement

KW - Survival

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447337023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34447337023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.JGP.0000239263.52621.97

DO - 10.1097/01.JGP.0000239263.52621.97

M3 - Article

C2 - 17384314

AN - SCOPUS:34447337023

VL - 15

SP - 314

EP - 327

JO - American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

JF - American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

SN - 1064-7481

IS - 4

ER -