Precautionary allergen labelling: Perspectives from key stakeholder groups

A. DunnGalvin, C. H. Chan, R. Crevel, K. Grimshaw, R. Poms, S. Schnadt, S. L. Taylor, P. Turner, K. J. Allen, M. Austin, A. Baka, J. L. Baumert, S. Baumgartner, K. Beyer, L. Bucchini, M. Fernández-Rivas, K. Grinter, G. F. Houben, J. Hourihane, F. KennaA. G. Kruizinga, G. Lack, C. B. Madsen, E. N. Clare Mills, N. G. Papadopoulos, A. Alldrick, L. Regent, R. Sherlock, J. M. Wal, G. Roberts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Precautionary allergen labelling (PAL) was introduced by the food industry to help manage and communicate the possibility of reaction from the unintended presence of allergens in foods. However, in its current form, PAL is counterproductive for consumers with food allergies. This review aims to summarize the perspectives of all the key stakeholders (including clinicians, patients, food industry and regulators), with the aim of defining common health protection and risk minimization goals. The lack of agreed reference doses has resulted in inconsistent application of PAL by the food industry and in levels of contamination that prompt withdrawal action by enforcement officers. So there is a poor relationship between the presence or absence of PAL and actual reaction risk. This has led to a loss of trust in PAL, reducing the ability of consumers with food allergies to make informed choices. The result has been reduced avoidance, reduced quality of life and increased risk-taking by consumers who often ignore PAL. All contributing stakeholders agree that PAL must reflect actual risk. PAL should be transparent and consistent with rules underpinning decision-making process being communicated clearly to all stakeholders. The use of PAL should indicate the possible, unintended presence of an allergen in a consumed portion of a food product at or above any proposed action level. This will require combined work by all stakeholders to ensure everyone understands the approach and its limitations. Consumers with food allergy then need to be educated to undertake individualized risk assessments in relation to any PAL present.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1039-1051
Number of pages13
JournalAllergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume70
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

Allergens
Food Hypersensitivity
Food Industry
Food
Aptitude
Risk-Taking
Decision Making
Quality of Life

Keywords

  • consumers
  • food allergen
  • food allergy
  • precautionary allergen labelling
  • quantitative risk assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology

Cite this

DunnGalvin, A., Chan, C. H., Crevel, R., Grimshaw, K., Poms, R., Schnadt, S., ... Roberts, G. (2015). Precautionary allergen labelling: Perspectives from key stakeholder groups. Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 70(9), 1039-1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12614

Precautionary allergen labelling : Perspectives from key stakeholder groups. / DunnGalvin, A.; Chan, C. H.; Crevel, R.; Grimshaw, K.; Poms, R.; Schnadt, S.; Taylor, S. L.; Turner, P.; Allen, K. J.; Austin, M.; Baka, A.; Baumert, J. L.; Baumgartner, S.; Beyer, K.; Bucchini, L.; Fernández-Rivas, M.; Grinter, K.; Houben, G. F.; Hourihane, J.; Kenna, F.; Kruizinga, A. G.; Lack, G.; Madsen, C. B.; Clare Mills, E. N.; Papadopoulos, N. G.; Alldrick, A.; Regent, L.; Sherlock, R.; Wal, J. M.; Roberts, G.

In: Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Vol. 70, No. 9, 01.09.2015, p. 1039-1051.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DunnGalvin, A, Chan, CH, Crevel, R, Grimshaw, K, Poms, R, Schnadt, S, Taylor, SL, Turner, P, Allen, KJ, Austin, M, Baka, A, Baumert, JL, Baumgartner, S, Beyer, K, Bucchini, L, Fernández-Rivas, M, Grinter, K, Houben, GF, Hourihane, J, Kenna, F, Kruizinga, AG, Lack, G, Madsen, CB, Clare Mills, EN, Papadopoulos, NG, Alldrick, A, Regent, L, Sherlock, R, Wal, JM & Roberts, G 2015, 'Precautionary allergen labelling: Perspectives from key stakeholder groups', Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 1039-1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12614
DunnGalvin, A. ; Chan, C. H. ; Crevel, R. ; Grimshaw, K. ; Poms, R. ; Schnadt, S. ; Taylor, S. L. ; Turner, P. ; Allen, K. J. ; Austin, M. ; Baka, A. ; Baumert, J. L. ; Baumgartner, S. ; Beyer, K. ; Bucchini, L. ; Fernández-Rivas, M. ; Grinter, K. ; Houben, G. F. ; Hourihane, J. ; Kenna, F. ; Kruizinga, A. G. ; Lack, G. ; Madsen, C. B. ; Clare Mills, E. N. ; Papadopoulos, N. G. ; Alldrick, A. ; Regent, L. ; Sherlock, R. ; Wal, J. M. ; Roberts, G. / Precautionary allergen labelling : Perspectives from key stakeholder groups. In: Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2015 ; Vol. 70, No. 9. pp. 1039-1051.
@article{9356be66d5f9426ba7a972b11da6150c,
title = "Precautionary allergen labelling: Perspectives from key stakeholder groups",
abstract = "Precautionary allergen labelling (PAL) was introduced by the food industry to help manage and communicate the possibility of reaction from the unintended presence of allergens in foods. However, in its current form, PAL is counterproductive for consumers with food allergies. This review aims to summarize the perspectives of all the key stakeholders (including clinicians, patients, food industry and regulators), with the aim of defining common health protection and risk minimization goals. The lack of agreed reference doses has resulted in inconsistent application of PAL by the food industry and in levels of contamination that prompt withdrawal action by enforcement officers. So there is a poor relationship between the presence or absence of PAL and actual reaction risk. This has led to a loss of trust in PAL, reducing the ability of consumers with food allergies to make informed choices. The result has been reduced avoidance, reduced quality of life and increased risk-taking by consumers who often ignore PAL. All contributing stakeholders agree that PAL must reflect actual risk. PAL should be transparent and consistent with rules underpinning decision-making process being communicated clearly to all stakeholders. The use of PAL should indicate the possible, unintended presence of an allergen in a consumed portion of a food product at or above any proposed action level. This will require combined work by all stakeholders to ensure everyone understands the approach and its limitations. Consumers with food allergy then need to be educated to undertake individualized risk assessments in relation to any PAL present.",
keywords = "consumers, food allergen, food allergy, precautionary allergen labelling, quantitative risk assessment",
author = "A. DunnGalvin and Chan, {C. H.} and R. Crevel and K. Grimshaw and R. Poms and S. Schnadt and Taylor, {S. L.} and P. Turner and Allen, {K. J.} and M. Austin and A. Baka and Baumert, {J. L.} and S. Baumgartner and K. Beyer and L. Bucchini and M. Fern{\'a}ndez-Rivas and K. Grinter and Houben, {G. F.} and J. Hourihane and F. Kenna and Kruizinga, {A. G.} and G. Lack and Madsen, {C. B.} and {Clare Mills}, {E. N.} and Papadopoulos, {N. G.} and A. Alldrick and L. Regent and R. Sherlock and Wal, {J. M.} and G. Roberts",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/all.12614",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "1039--1051",
journal = "Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology",
issn = "0105-4538",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Precautionary allergen labelling

T2 - Perspectives from key stakeholder groups

AU - DunnGalvin, A.

AU - Chan, C. H.

AU - Crevel, R.

AU - Grimshaw, K.

AU - Poms, R.

AU - Schnadt, S.

AU - Taylor, S. L.

AU - Turner, P.

AU - Allen, K. J.

AU - Austin, M.

AU - Baka, A.

AU - Baumert, J. L.

AU - Baumgartner, S.

AU - Beyer, K.

AU - Bucchini, L.

AU - Fernández-Rivas, M.

AU - Grinter, K.

AU - Houben, G. F.

AU - Hourihane, J.

AU - Kenna, F.

AU - Kruizinga, A. G.

AU - Lack, G.

AU - Madsen, C. B.

AU - Clare Mills, E. N.

AU - Papadopoulos, N. G.

AU - Alldrick, A.

AU - Regent, L.

AU - Sherlock, R.

AU - Wal, J. M.

AU - Roberts, G.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Precautionary allergen labelling (PAL) was introduced by the food industry to help manage and communicate the possibility of reaction from the unintended presence of allergens in foods. However, in its current form, PAL is counterproductive for consumers with food allergies. This review aims to summarize the perspectives of all the key stakeholders (including clinicians, patients, food industry and regulators), with the aim of defining common health protection and risk minimization goals. The lack of agreed reference doses has resulted in inconsistent application of PAL by the food industry and in levels of contamination that prompt withdrawal action by enforcement officers. So there is a poor relationship between the presence or absence of PAL and actual reaction risk. This has led to a loss of trust in PAL, reducing the ability of consumers with food allergies to make informed choices. The result has been reduced avoidance, reduced quality of life and increased risk-taking by consumers who often ignore PAL. All contributing stakeholders agree that PAL must reflect actual risk. PAL should be transparent and consistent with rules underpinning decision-making process being communicated clearly to all stakeholders. The use of PAL should indicate the possible, unintended presence of an allergen in a consumed portion of a food product at or above any proposed action level. This will require combined work by all stakeholders to ensure everyone understands the approach and its limitations. Consumers with food allergy then need to be educated to undertake individualized risk assessments in relation to any PAL present.

AB - Precautionary allergen labelling (PAL) was introduced by the food industry to help manage and communicate the possibility of reaction from the unintended presence of allergens in foods. However, in its current form, PAL is counterproductive for consumers with food allergies. This review aims to summarize the perspectives of all the key stakeholders (including clinicians, patients, food industry and regulators), with the aim of defining common health protection and risk minimization goals. The lack of agreed reference doses has resulted in inconsistent application of PAL by the food industry and in levels of contamination that prompt withdrawal action by enforcement officers. So there is a poor relationship between the presence or absence of PAL and actual reaction risk. This has led to a loss of trust in PAL, reducing the ability of consumers with food allergies to make informed choices. The result has been reduced avoidance, reduced quality of life and increased risk-taking by consumers who often ignore PAL. All contributing stakeholders agree that PAL must reflect actual risk. PAL should be transparent and consistent with rules underpinning decision-making process being communicated clearly to all stakeholders. The use of PAL should indicate the possible, unintended presence of an allergen in a consumed portion of a food product at or above any proposed action level. This will require combined work by all stakeholders to ensure everyone understands the approach and its limitations. Consumers with food allergy then need to be educated to undertake individualized risk assessments in relation to any PAL present.

KW - consumers

KW - food allergen

KW - food allergy

KW - precautionary allergen labelling

KW - quantitative risk assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940453169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940453169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/all.12614

DO - 10.1111/all.12614

M3 - Article

C2 - 25808296

AN - SCOPUS:84940453169

VL - 70

SP - 1039

EP - 1051

JO - Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

JF - Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

SN - 0105-4538

IS - 9

ER -