Practical guidelines for educating policymakers: The Family Impact Seminar as an approach to advancing the interests of children and families in the policy arena

Brian L. Wilcox, P. Victoria Weisz, Monica K. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Psychologists are well positioned to contribute to policymaking on issues affecting the well-being of children, youth, and families. A good deal of psychological research is relevant to policy issues such as child mental health services, child care, adoption and foster care, and children 's media. In this article we offer an alternative to direct policy advocacy as a means for psychologists' involvement in the policy arena. Policy education, a nonpartisan and nonadversarial approach to working with policymakers, is described and differentiated from child advocacy. We then present an example of 1 approach to policy education, the Family Impact Seminar. The article closes with a discussion of lessons we have learned regarding effectively communicating research to policymakers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)638-645
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2005

Fingerprint

Family Planning Policy
Guidelines
Child Care
Psychology
Child Advocacy
Child Health Services
Education
Mental Health Services
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Practical guidelines for educating policymakers : The Family Impact Seminar as an approach to advancing the interests of children and families in the policy arena. / Wilcox, Brian L.; Weisz, P. Victoria; Miller, Monica K.

In: Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Vol. 34, No. 4, 01.12.2005, p. 638-645.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f09a507c13b54073a70685a43546e821,
title = "Practical guidelines for educating policymakers: The Family Impact Seminar as an approach to advancing the interests of children and families in the policy arena",
abstract = "Psychologists are well positioned to contribute to policymaking on issues affecting the well-being of children, youth, and families. A good deal of psychological research is relevant to policy issues such as child mental health services, child care, adoption and foster care, and children 's media. In this article we offer an alternative to direct policy advocacy as a means for psychologists' involvement in the policy arena. Policy education, a nonpartisan and nonadversarial approach to working with policymakers, is described and differentiated from child advocacy. We then present an example of 1 approach to policy education, the Family Impact Seminar. The article closes with a discussion of lessons we have learned regarding effectively communicating research to policymakers.",
author = "Wilcox, {Brian L.} and Weisz, {P. Victoria} and Miller, {Monica K.}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1207/s15374424jccp3404_6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "638--645",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology",
issn = "1537-4416",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practical guidelines for educating policymakers

T2 - The Family Impact Seminar as an approach to advancing the interests of children and families in the policy arena

AU - Wilcox, Brian L.

AU - Weisz, P. Victoria

AU - Miller, Monica K.

PY - 2005/12/1

Y1 - 2005/12/1

N2 - Psychologists are well positioned to contribute to policymaking on issues affecting the well-being of children, youth, and families. A good deal of psychological research is relevant to policy issues such as child mental health services, child care, adoption and foster care, and children 's media. In this article we offer an alternative to direct policy advocacy as a means for psychologists' involvement in the policy arena. Policy education, a nonpartisan and nonadversarial approach to working with policymakers, is described and differentiated from child advocacy. We then present an example of 1 approach to policy education, the Family Impact Seminar. The article closes with a discussion of lessons we have learned regarding effectively communicating research to policymakers.

AB - Psychologists are well positioned to contribute to policymaking on issues affecting the well-being of children, youth, and families. A good deal of psychological research is relevant to policy issues such as child mental health services, child care, adoption and foster care, and children 's media. In this article we offer an alternative to direct policy advocacy as a means for psychologists' involvement in the policy arena. Policy education, a nonpartisan and nonadversarial approach to working with policymakers, is described and differentiated from child advocacy. We then present an example of 1 approach to policy education, the Family Impact Seminar. The article closes with a discussion of lessons we have learned regarding effectively communicating research to policymakers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=30444431949&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=30444431949&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/s15374424jccp3404_6

DO - 10.1207/s15374424jccp3404_6

M3 - Article

C2 - 16232061

AN - SCOPUS:30444431949

VL - 34

SP - 638

EP - 645

JO - Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology

JF - Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology

SN - 1537-4416

IS - 4

ER -