Power increases situated creativity

Sarah J Gervais, Ana Guinote, Jill Allen, Letitia Slabu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present paper examined whether power was linked with situated creativity. We proposed that powerful (vs powerless) people engage in creative thought when creativity contributes to contextual goals but avoid creative thought when creativity impedes contextual goals. Extending the Situated Focus Theory of Power (Guinote, 2007a; 2010) to creativity, we suggested that powerful people are better able to achieve situational goals because they can flexibly focus on cues that indicate what is required for success in a given context. Across three experiments, we found that powerful (vs powerless) people engaged in more creative thinking when creativity facilitated contextual goals. This was not the case when creativity hindered contextual goals. Further, neither affect (Experiment 2) nor effort (Experiments 1 and 3) contributed to these effects. However, local processing undermined creativity for powerful people, indicating that processing style may contribute to the link between power and situated creativity. These findings suggest that powerful people flexibly vary creativity in line with the situation. This research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation awarded to Sarah J. Gervais and Theresa K. Vescio for dissertation enhancement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)294-311
Number of pages18
JournalSocial Influence
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Creativity
Power (Psychology)
Cues

Keywords

  • Creativity
  • Global processing
  • Goals
  • Power

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Power increases situated creativity. / Gervais, Sarah J; Guinote, Ana; Allen, Jill; Slabu, Letitia.

In: Social Influence, Vol. 8, No. 4, 01.01.2013, p. 294-311.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gervais, SJ, Guinote, A, Allen, J & Slabu, L 2013, 'Power increases situated creativity', Social Influence, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 294-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2012.742457
Gervais, Sarah J ; Guinote, Ana ; Allen, Jill ; Slabu, Letitia. / Power increases situated creativity. In: Social Influence. 2013 ; Vol. 8, No. 4. pp. 294-311.
@article{6924566632ab4521be2d763e782d7cf7,
title = "Power increases situated creativity",
abstract = "The present paper examined whether power was linked with situated creativity. We proposed that powerful (vs powerless) people engage in creative thought when creativity contributes to contextual goals but avoid creative thought when creativity impedes contextual goals. Extending the Situated Focus Theory of Power (Guinote, 2007a; 2010) to creativity, we suggested that powerful people are better able to achieve situational goals because they can flexibly focus on cues that indicate what is required for success in a given context. Across three experiments, we found that powerful (vs powerless) people engaged in more creative thinking when creativity facilitated contextual goals. This was not the case when creativity hindered contextual goals. Further, neither affect (Experiment 2) nor effort (Experiments 1 and 3) contributed to these effects. However, local processing undermined creativity for powerful people, indicating that processing style may contribute to the link between power and situated creativity. These findings suggest that powerful people flexibly vary creativity in line with the situation. This research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation awarded to Sarah J. Gervais and Theresa K. Vescio for dissertation enhancement.",
keywords = "Creativity, Global processing, Goals, Power",
author = "Gervais, {Sarah J} and Ana Guinote and Jill Allen and Letitia Slabu",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15534510.2012.742457",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "294--311",
journal = "Social Influence",
issn = "1553-4510",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Power increases situated creativity

AU - Gervais, Sarah J

AU - Guinote, Ana

AU - Allen, Jill

AU - Slabu, Letitia

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - The present paper examined whether power was linked with situated creativity. We proposed that powerful (vs powerless) people engage in creative thought when creativity contributes to contextual goals but avoid creative thought when creativity impedes contextual goals. Extending the Situated Focus Theory of Power (Guinote, 2007a; 2010) to creativity, we suggested that powerful people are better able to achieve situational goals because they can flexibly focus on cues that indicate what is required for success in a given context. Across three experiments, we found that powerful (vs powerless) people engaged in more creative thinking when creativity facilitated contextual goals. This was not the case when creativity hindered contextual goals. Further, neither affect (Experiment 2) nor effort (Experiments 1 and 3) contributed to these effects. However, local processing undermined creativity for powerful people, indicating that processing style may contribute to the link between power and situated creativity. These findings suggest that powerful people flexibly vary creativity in line with the situation. This research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation awarded to Sarah J. Gervais and Theresa K. Vescio for dissertation enhancement.

AB - The present paper examined whether power was linked with situated creativity. We proposed that powerful (vs powerless) people engage in creative thought when creativity contributes to contextual goals but avoid creative thought when creativity impedes contextual goals. Extending the Situated Focus Theory of Power (Guinote, 2007a; 2010) to creativity, we suggested that powerful people are better able to achieve situational goals because they can flexibly focus on cues that indicate what is required for success in a given context. Across three experiments, we found that powerful (vs powerless) people engaged in more creative thinking when creativity facilitated contextual goals. This was not the case when creativity hindered contextual goals. Further, neither affect (Experiment 2) nor effort (Experiments 1 and 3) contributed to these effects. However, local processing undermined creativity for powerful people, indicating that processing style may contribute to the link between power and situated creativity. These findings suggest that powerful people flexibly vary creativity in line with the situation. This research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation awarded to Sarah J. Gervais and Theresa K. Vescio for dissertation enhancement.

KW - Creativity

KW - Global processing

KW - Goals

KW - Power

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883550668&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883550668&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15534510.2012.742457

DO - 10.1080/15534510.2012.742457

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 294

EP - 311

JO - Social Influence

JF - Social Influence

SN - 1553-4510

IS - 4

ER -