Potential impacts of ultra-high-pressure (UHP) technology on NFPA Standard 403

Kevin R Grosskopf, Jennifer Kalberer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Ultra-high-pressure (UHP) technology as well as compressed air foam (CAF) and combined agent firefighting systems (CAFFS) have proven to enhance the performance of firefighting equipment using water and aqueous film forming foam (AFFF). UHP systems are capable of producing small water droplets at high velocity. As droplet size is reduced, surface area relative to mass increases, improving heat transfer. Smaller droplets however, experience greater drag, reducing throw distance. Findings indicate that on average, 150 m/s exit plane velocities result in maximum throw distances of between 4600 and 5600 orifice diameters. UHP prototype and full-scale testing conducted from 2004 to 2006 found that exit plane velocities of 150 m/s were found to produce 90-100 μm droplets, sizes considered optimal for fire extinguishment. In addition, UHP systems were able to extinguish two-dimensional fuel fires ranging in area from 81.6 to 613.8 m2 using one-third the agent when compared to baseline AFFF tests, and one-tenth the NFPA 403 standard.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)308-315
Number of pages8
JournalFire Safety Journal
Volume43
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2008

Fingerprint

foams
Foams
Fires
compressed air
Water
Compressed air
orifices
Orifices
water
drag
Drag
heat transfer
prototypes
Heat transfer
Testing

Keywords

  • Aircraft rescue and firefighting (ARFF)
  • Aqueous film forming foam (AFFF)
  • NFPA Standard 403

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Cite this

Potential impacts of ultra-high-pressure (UHP) technology on NFPA Standard 403. / Grosskopf, Kevin R; Kalberer, Jennifer.

In: Fire Safety Journal, Vol. 43, No. 4, 01.05.2008, p. 308-315.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ed88123005b240df97954a52a8000df4,
title = "Potential impacts of ultra-high-pressure (UHP) technology on NFPA Standard 403",
abstract = "Ultra-high-pressure (UHP) technology as well as compressed air foam (CAF) and combined agent firefighting systems (CAFFS) have proven to enhance the performance of firefighting equipment using water and aqueous film forming foam (AFFF). UHP systems are capable of producing small water droplets at high velocity. As droplet size is reduced, surface area relative to mass increases, improving heat transfer. Smaller droplets however, experience greater drag, reducing throw distance. Findings indicate that on average, 150 m/s exit plane velocities result in maximum throw distances of between 4600 and 5600 orifice diameters. UHP prototype and full-scale testing conducted from 2004 to 2006 found that exit plane velocities of 150 m/s were found to produce 90-100 μm droplets, sizes considered optimal for fire extinguishment. In addition, UHP systems were able to extinguish two-dimensional fuel fires ranging in area from 81.6 to 613.8 m2 using one-third the agent when compared to baseline AFFF tests, and one-tenth the NFPA 403 standard.",
keywords = "Aircraft rescue and firefighting (ARFF), Aqueous film forming foam (AFFF), NFPA Standard 403",
author = "Grosskopf, {Kevin R} and Jennifer Kalberer",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.firesaf.2007.06.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "308--315",
journal = "Fire Safety Journal",
issn = "0379-7112",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Potential impacts of ultra-high-pressure (UHP) technology on NFPA Standard 403

AU - Grosskopf, Kevin R

AU - Kalberer, Jennifer

PY - 2008/5/1

Y1 - 2008/5/1

N2 - Ultra-high-pressure (UHP) technology as well as compressed air foam (CAF) and combined agent firefighting systems (CAFFS) have proven to enhance the performance of firefighting equipment using water and aqueous film forming foam (AFFF). UHP systems are capable of producing small water droplets at high velocity. As droplet size is reduced, surface area relative to mass increases, improving heat transfer. Smaller droplets however, experience greater drag, reducing throw distance. Findings indicate that on average, 150 m/s exit plane velocities result in maximum throw distances of between 4600 and 5600 orifice diameters. UHP prototype and full-scale testing conducted from 2004 to 2006 found that exit plane velocities of 150 m/s were found to produce 90-100 μm droplets, sizes considered optimal for fire extinguishment. In addition, UHP systems were able to extinguish two-dimensional fuel fires ranging in area from 81.6 to 613.8 m2 using one-third the agent when compared to baseline AFFF tests, and one-tenth the NFPA 403 standard.

AB - Ultra-high-pressure (UHP) technology as well as compressed air foam (CAF) and combined agent firefighting systems (CAFFS) have proven to enhance the performance of firefighting equipment using water and aqueous film forming foam (AFFF). UHP systems are capable of producing small water droplets at high velocity. As droplet size is reduced, surface area relative to mass increases, improving heat transfer. Smaller droplets however, experience greater drag, reducing throw distance. Findings indicate that on average, 150 m/s exit plane velocities result in maximum throw distances of between 4600 and 5600 orifice diameters. UHP prototype and full-scale testing conducted from 2004 to 2006 found that exit plane velocities of 150 m/s were found to produce 90-100 μm droplets, sizes considered optimal for fire extinguishment. In addition, UHP systems were able to extinguish two-dimensional fuel fires ranging in area from 81.6 to 613.8 m2 using one-third the agent when compared to baseline AFFF tests, and one-tenth the NFPA 403 standard.

KW - Aircraft rescue and firefighting (ARFF)

KW - Aqueous film forming foam (AFFF)

KW - NFPA Standard 403

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43549085257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43549085257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.firesaf.2007.06.010

DO - 10.1016/j.firesaf.2007.06.010

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 308

EP - 315

JO - Fire Safety Journal

JF - Fire Safety Journal

SN - 0379-7112

IS - 4

ER -