Policymakers’ Perceptions of the Benefits of Citizen-Budgeting Activities

Tarik L Abdel-Monem, Mitchel N. Herian, Rick Hoppe, Lisa Marie Pytlik Zillig, Alan J. Tomkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Citizen budgeting has become an increasingly common practice in municipalities across the United States. It offers an alternative to traditionally technocratic budgeting processes, and can connect and engage citizens in decisions about services and funding. Little research has been conducted on how local policymakers perceive citizen budgeting and outcomes. This study examined the benefits local policymakers identified following two successive years of a citizen-budgeting process in a mid-sized Midwestern city. Interviews with 23 local policymakers (a mayor, city council members, and city department heads) identified nine types of benefits produced by the citizen-budgeting process. The study demonstrates that identifying perceived benefits of citizen-budgeting processes can shed light on the question of the extent to which such budgeting methods are citizen-driven, leader-driven, or a combination of both.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)835-863
Number of pages29
JournalPublic Performance and Management Review
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

citizen
municipal council
mayor
Budgeting
Politicians
municipality
funding
leader
interview

Keywords

  • citizen budgeting
  • local government
  • public input
  • public participation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Administration
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Policymakers’ Perceptions of the Benefits of Citizen-Budgeting Activities. / Abdel-Monem, Tarik L; Herian, Mitchel N.; Hoppe, Rick; Pytlik Zillig, Lisa Marie; Tomkins, Alan J.

In: Public Performance and Management Review, Vol. 39, No. 4, 01.10.2016, p. 835-863.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0aba20e678ba489eba08e66f39e42cf1,
title = "Policymakers’ Perceptions of the Benefits of Citizen-Budgeting Activities",
abstract = "Citizen budgeting has become an increasingly common practice in municipalities across the United States. It offers an alternative to traditionally technocratic budgeting processes, and can connect and engage citizens in decisions about services and funding. Little research has been conducted on how local policymakers perceive citizen budgeting and outcomes. This study examined the benefits local policymakers identified following two successive years of a citizen-budgeting process in a mid-sized Midwestern city. Interviews with 23 local policymakers (a mayor, city council members, and city department heads) identified nine types of benefits produced by the citizen-budgeting process. The study demonstrates that identifying perceived benefits of citizen-budgeting processes can shed light on the question of the extent to which such budgeting methods are citizen-driven, leader-driven, or a combination of both.",
keywords = "citizen budgeting, local government, public input, public participation",
author = "Abdel-Monem, {Tarik L} and Herian, {Mitchel N.} and Rick Hoppe and {Pytlik Zillig}, {Lisa Marie} and Tomkins, {Alan J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15309576.2015.1137774",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "835--863",
journal = "Public Performance & Management Review",
issn = "1530-9576",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Policymakers’ Perceptions of the Benefits of Citizen-Budgeting Activities

AU - Abdel-Monem, Tarik L

AU - Herian, Mitchel N.

AU - Hoppe, Rick

AU - Pytlik Zillig, Lisa Marie

AU - Tomkins, Alan J.

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Citizen budgeting has become an increasingly common practice in municipalities across the United States. It offers an alternative to traditionally technocratic budgeting processes, and can connect and engage citizens in decisions about services and funding. Little research has been conducted on how local policymakers perceive citizen budgeting and outcomes. This study examined the benefits local policymakers identified following two successive years of a citizen-budgeting process in a mid-sized Midwestern city. Interviews with 23 local policymakers (a mayor, city council members, and city department heads) identified nine types of benefits produced by the citizen-budgeting process. The study demonstrates that identifying perceived benefits of citizen-budgeting processes can shed light on the question of the extent to which such budgeting methods are citizen-driven, leader-driven, or a combination of both.

AB - Citizen budgeting has become an increasingly common practice in municipalities across the United States. It offers an alternative to traditionally technocratic budgeting processes, and can connect and engage citizens in decisions about services and funding. Little research has been conducted on how local policymakers perceive citizen budgeting and outcomes. This study examined the benefits local policymakers identified following two successive years of a citizen-budgeting process in a mid-sized Midwestern city. Interviews with 23 local policymakers (a mayor, city council members, and city department heads) identified nine types of benefits produced by the citizen-budgeting process. The study demonstrates that identifying perceived benefits of citizen-budgeting processes can shed light on the question of the extent to which such budgeting methods are citizen-driven, leader-driven, or a combination of both.

KW - citizen budgeting

KW - local government

KW - public input

KW - public participation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963563026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963563026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15309576.2015.1137774

DO - 10.1080/15309576.2015.1137774

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84963563026

VL - 39

SP - 835

EP - 863

JO - Public Performance & Management Review

JF - Public Performance & Management Review

SN - 1530-9576

IS - 4

ER -