Policy considerations for improving influenza vaccination rates among pregnant women

Elizabeth K Mollard, Nicholas Guenzel, Peggy A. Brown, Heidi J Keeler, Mary E Cramer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Influenza exposure during pregnancy can cause severe health problems for both the mother and her offspring, including an increased risk of mortality. Influenza vaccination during all trimesters of pregnancy is safe and effective, and recommended by professional organizations such as the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Despite these recommendations, the U.S. vaccination rates remain low in this high-risk population. Method: A policy analysis based on the five-part method identified by Teitelbaum and Wilensky (2013) addresses factors to consider in identifying the best voluntary policy options to improve the vaccination rates. The authors provide discussion of the background, landscape, and stakeholder interests and the pros and cons of two voluntary policy options to increase vaccination. The policy options include: (a) financial incentives for providers and (b) an education emphasis for providers and staff. Conclusions: The authors conclude that based on considerations of cost, provider preference, and practicality of implementation, a continuing educational intervention is the preferred policy venue to increase vaccination rates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)281-288
Number of pages8
JournalPublic Health Nursing
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Human Influenza
Pregnant Women
Vaccination
Pregnancy Trimesters
Policy Making
Gynecology
Obstetrics
Motivation
Mothers
Education
Costs and Cost Analysis
Pregnancy
Mortality
Health
Population

Keywords

  • Education
  • Immunization
  • Influenza
  • Policy
  • Pregnancy
  • Vaccination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Policy considerations for improving influenza vaccination rates among pregnant women. / Mollard, Elizabeth K; Guenzel, Nicholas; Brown, Peggy A.; Keeler, Heidi J; Cramer, Mary E.

In: Public Health Nursing, Vol. 31, No. 3, 01.01.2014, p. 281-288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{85dc8857aa9447a7b59f8e3e89b300a9,
title = "Policy considerations for improving influenza vaccination rates among pregnant women",
abstract = "Background: Influenza exposure during pregnancy can cause severe health problems for both the mother and her offspring, including an increased risk of mortality. Influenza vaccination during all trimesters of pregnancy is safe and effective, and recommended by professional organizations such as the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Despite these recommendations, the U.S. vaccination rates remain low in this high-risk population. Method: A policy analysis based on the five-part method identified by Teitelbaum and Wilensky (2013) addresses factors to consider in identifying the best voluntary policy options to improve the vaccination rates. The authors provide discussion of the background, landscape, and stakeholder interests and the pros and cons of two voluntary policy options to increase vaccination. The policy options include: (a) financial incentives for providers and (b) an education emphasis for providers and staff. Conclusions: The authors conclude that based on considerations of cost, provider preference, and practicality of implementation, a continuing educational intervention is the preferred policy venue to increase vaccination rates.",
keywords = "Education, Immunization, Influenza, Policy, Pregnancy, Vaccination",
author = "Mollard, {Elizabeth K} and Nicholas Guenzel and Brown, {Peggy A.} and Keeler, {Heidi J} and Cramer, {Mary E}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/phn.12099",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "281--288",
journal = "Public Health Nursing",
issn = "0737-1209",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Policy considerations for improving influenza vaccination rates among pregnant women

AU - Mollard, Elizabeth K

AU - Guenzel, Nicholas

AU - Brown, Peggy A.

AU - Keeler, Heidi J

AU - Cramer, Mary E

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Background: Influenza exposure during pregnancy can cause severe health problems for both the mother and her offspring, including an increased risk of mortality. Influenza vaccination during all trimesters of pregnancy is safe and effective, and recommended by professional organizations such as the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Despite these recommendations, the U.S. vaccination rates remain low in this high-risk population. Method: A policy analysis based on the five-part method identified by Teitelbaum and Wilensky (2013) addresses factors to consider in identifying the best voluntary policy options to improve the vaccination rates. The authors provide discussion of the background, landscape, and stakeholder interests and the pros and cons of two voluntary policy options to increase vaccination. The policy options include: (a) financial incentives for providers and (b) an education emphasis for providers and staff. Conclusions: The authors conclude that based on considerations of cost, provider preference, and practicality of implementation, a continuing educational intervention is the preferred policy venue to increase vaccination rates.

AB - Background: Influenza exposure during pregnancy can cause severe health problems for both the mother and her offspring, including an increased risk of mortality. Influenza vaccination during all trimesters of pregnancy is safe and effective, and recommended by professional organizations such as the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Despite these recommendations, the U.S. vaccination rates remain low in this high-risk population. Method: A policy analysis based on the five-part method identified by Teitelbaum and Wilensky (2013) addresses factors to consider in identifying the best voluntary policy options to improve the vaccination rates. The authors provide discussion of the background, landscape, and stakeholder interests and the pros and cons of two voluntary policy options to increase vaccination. The policy options include: (a) financial incentives for providers and (b) an education emphasis for providers and staff. Conclusions: The authors conclude that based on considerations of cost, provider preference, and practicality of implementation, a continuing educational intervention is the preferred policy venue to increase vaccination rates.

KW - Education

KW - Immunization

KW - Influenza

KW - Policy

KW - Pregnancy

KW - Vaccination

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898024419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898024419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/phn.12099

DO - 10.1111/phn.12099

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 281

EP - 288

JO - Public Health Nursing

JF - Public Health Nursing

SN - 0737-1209

IS - 3

ER -