Pneumotonometer Accuracy Using Manometric Measurements after Radial Keratotomy, Clear Corneal Incisions and Lamellar Dissection in Porcine Eyes

Lauren A. Maloley, M. Reza Razeghinejad, Shane J. Havens, Vikas Gulati, Shan Fan, Robin High, Deepta A. Ghate

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose/Aim of the study: Measured intraocular pressure (IOP) after corneal incisions may not be reflective of the true IOP because of changes in corneal biomechanical properties. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of various corneal incisions on pneumotonometer accuracy in enucleated porcine eyes. Materials and Methods: A pneumotonometer was used to measure IOP (IOPp) at manometrically controlled pressure levels of 10, 20, 30 and 40 mmHg in enucleated porcine eyes. IOP measurements at each level were repeated after one of the following corneal incisions: radial keratotomy (8 eyes), lamellar dissection (10 eyes), clear cornea standard phacoemulsification incisions (10 eyes). The pneumotonometer error, defined as the difference between IOPp and manometric pressure (IOPm), was calculated for each pressure level. The error before the corneal incisions was compared to the error after the corneal incisions to assess the accuracy of the pneumotonometer. Results: The pneumotonometer underestimates true IOP at all pressure levels, both before and after the corneal procedures. There was a statistically significant greater underestimation of IOP after radial keratotomy incisions at pressure levels of 20, 30 and 40 mmHg (p = .013, 0.004, and 0.002, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in the amount of pneumotonometer underestimation error after lamellar dissection or standard cataract incisions. Conclusion: The pneumotonometer underestimates true IOP in enucleated porcine eyes at all pressure levels between 10–40 mmHg. Radial keratotomy incisions caused a statistically significant greater underestimation error in pneumotonometry measurements at pressures of 20–40 mmHg. Lamellar dissection and clear corneal cataract incisions did not cause an additional error in pneumotonometry measurements in enucleated porcine eyes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Eye Research
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2020

Fingerprint

Radial Keratotomy
Intraocular Pressure
Dissection
Swine
Pressure
Cataract
Naphazoline
Phacoemulsification
Cornea

Keywords

  • Pneumotonometer
  • intraocular pressure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Cite this

Pneumotonometer Accuracy Using Manometric Measurements after Radial Keratotomy, Clear Corneal Incisions and Lamellar Dissection in Porcine Eyes. / Maloley, Lauren A.; Razeghinejad, M. Reza; Havens, Shane J.; Gulati, Vikas; Fan, Shan; High, Robin; Ghate, Deepta A.

In: Current Eye Research, Vol. 45, No. 1, 02.01.2020, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5609280aeb624ae891e350e520d079e2,
title = "Pneumotonometer Accuracy Using Manometric Measurements after Radial Keratotomy, Clear Corneal Incisions and Lamellar Dissection in Porcine Eyes",
abstract = "Purpose/Aim of the study: Measured intraocular pressure (IOP) after corneal incisions may not be reflective of the true IOP because of changes in corneal biomechanical properties. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of various corneal incisions on pneumotonometer accuracy in enucleated porcine eyes. Materials and Methods: A pneumotonometer was used to measure IOP (IOPp) at manometrically controlled pressure levels of 10, 20, 30 and 40 mmHg in enucleated porcine eyes. IOP measurements at each level were repeated after one of the following corneal incisions: radial keratotomy (8 eyes), lamellar dissection (10 eyes), clear cornea standard phacoemulsification incisions (10 eyes). The pneumotonometer error, defined as the difference between IOPp and manometric pressure (IOPm), was calculated for each pressure level. The error before the corneal incisions was compared to the error after the corneal incisions to assess the accuracy of the pneumotonometer. Results: The pneumotonometer underestimates true IOP at all pressure levels, both before and after the corneal procedures. There was a statistically significant greater underestimation of IOP after radial keratotomy incisions at pressure levels of 20, 30 and 40 mmHg (p = .013, 0.004, and 0.002, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in the amount of pneumotonometer underestimation error after lamellar dissection or standard cataract incisions. Conclusion: The pneumotonometer underestimates true IOP in enucleated porcine eyes at all pressure levels between 10–40 mmHg. Radial keratotomy incisions caused a statistically significant greater underestimation error in pneumotonometry measurements at pressures of 20–40 mmHg. Lamellar dissection and clear corneal cataract incisions did not cause an additional error in pneumotonometry measurements in enucleated porcine eyes.",
keywords = "Pneumotonometer, intraocular pressure",
author = "Maloley, {Lauren A.} and Razeghinejad, {M. Reza} and Havens, {Shane J.} and Vikas Gulati and Shan Fan and Robin High and Ghate, {Deepta A.}",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/02713683.2019.1652915",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Current Eye Research",
issn = "0271-3683",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pneumotonometer Accuracy Using Manometric Measurements after Radial Keratotomy, Clear Corneal Incisions and Lamellar Dissection in Porcine Eyes

AU - Maloley, Lauren A.

AU - Razeghinejad, M. Reza

AU - Havens, Shane J.

AU - Gulati, Vikas

AU - Fan, Shan

AU - High, Robin

AU - Ghate, Deepta A.

PY - 2020/1/2

Y1 - 2020/1/2

N2 - Purpose/Aim of the study: Measured intraocular pressure (IOP) after corneal incisions may not be reflective of the true IOP because of changes in corneal biomechanical properties. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of various corneal incisions on pneumotonometer accuracy in enucleated porcine eyes. Materials and Methods: A pneumotonometer was used to measure IOP (IOPp) at manometrically controlled pressure levels of 10, 20, 30 and 40 mmHg in enucleated porcine eyes. IOP measurements at each level were repeated after one of the following corneal incisions: radial keratotomy (8 eyes), lamellar dissection (10 eyes), clear cornea standard phacoemulsification incisions (10 eyes). The pneumotonometer error, defined as the difference between IOPp and manometric pressure (IOPm), was calculated for each pressure level. The error before the corneal incisions was compared to the error after the corneal incisions to assess the accuracy of the pneumotonometer. Results: The pneumotonometer underestimates true IOP at all pressure levels, both before and after the corneal procedures. There was a statistically significant greater underestimation of IOP after radial keratotomy incisions at pressure levels of 20, 30 and 40 mmHg (p = .013, 0.004, and 0.002, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in the amount of pneumotonometer underestimation error after lamellar dissection or standard cataract incisions. Conclusion: The pneumotonometer underestimates true IOP in enucleated porcine eyes at all pressure levels between 10–40 mmHg. Radial keratotomy incisions caused a statistically significant greater underestimation error in pneumotonometry measurements at pressures of 20–40 mmHg. Lamellar dissection and clear corneal cataract incisions did not cause an additional error in pneumotonometry measurements in enucleated porcine eyes.

AB - Purpose/Aim of the study: Measured intraocular pressure (IOP) after corneal incisions may not be reflective of the true IOP because of changes in corneal biomechanical properties. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of various corneal incisions on pneumotonometer accuracy in enucleated porcine eyes. Materials and Methods: A pneumotonometer was used to measure IOP (IOPp) at manometrically controlled pressure levels of 10, 20, 30 and 40 mmHg in enucleated porcine eyes. IOP measurements at each level were repeated after one of the following corneal incisions: radial keratotomy (8 eyes), lamellar dissection (10 eyes), clear cornea standard phacoemulsification incisions (10 eyes). The pneumotonometer error, defined as the difference between IOPp and manometric pressure (IOPm), was calculated for each pressure level. The error before the corneal incisions was compared to the error after the corneal incisions to assess the accuracy of the pneumotonometer. Results: The pneumotonometer underestimates true IOP at all pressure levels, both before and after the corneal procedures. There was a statistically significant greater underestimation of IOP after radial keratotomy incisions at pressure levels of 20, 30 and 40 mmHg (p = .013, 0.004, and 0.002, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in the amount of pneumotonometer underestimation error after lamellar dissection or standard cataract incisions. Conclusion: The pneumotonometer underestimates true IOP in enucleated porcine eyes at all pressure levels between 10–40 mmHg. Radial keratotomy incisions caused a statistically significant greater underestimation error in pneumotonometry measurements at pressures of 20–40 mmHg. Lamellar dissection and clear corneal cataract incisions did not cause an additional error in pneumotonometry measurements in enucleated porcine eyes.

KW - Pneumotonometer

KW - intraocular pressure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071283140&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071283140&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02713683.2019.1652915

DO - 10.1080/02713683.2019.1652915

M3 - Article

C2 - 31380714

AN - SCOPUS:85071283140

VL - 45

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Current Eye Research

JF - Current Eye Research

SN - 0271-3683

IS - 1

ER -