Planning for robust reserve networks using uncertainty analysis

Atte Moilanen, Michael C. Runge, Jane Elith, Andrew Tyre, Yohay Carmel, Eric Fegraus, Brendan A. Wintle, Mark Burgman, Yakov Ben-Haim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

73 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Planning land-use for biodiversity conservation frequently involves computer-assisted reserve selection algorithms. Typically such algorithms operate on matrices of species presence-absence in sites, or on species-specific distributions of model predicted probabilities of occurrence in grid cells. There are practically always errors in input data-erroneous species presence-absence data, structural and parametric uncertainty in predictive habitat models, and lack of correspondence between temporal presence and long-run persistence. Despite these uncertainties, typical reserve selection methods proceed as if there is no uncertainty in the data or models. Having two conservation options of apparently equal biological value, one would prefer the option whose value is relatively insensitive to errors in planning inputs. In this work we show how uncertainty analysis for reserve planning can be implemented within a framework of information-gap decision theory, generating reserve designs that are robust to uncertainty. Consideration of uncertainty involves modifications to the typical objective functions used in reserve selection. Search for robust-optimal reserve structures can still be implemented via typical reserve selection optimization techniques, including stepwise heuristics, integer-programming and stochastic global search.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)115-124
Number of pages10
JournalEcological Modelling
Volume199
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2006

Fingerprint

reserve networks
uncertainty analysis
uncertainty
planning
reserve design
land use planning
heuristics
selection methods
persistence
biodiversity
matrix
habitat
habitats
cells

Keywords

  • Conservation planning
  • Information-gap decision theory
  • Reserve selection
  • Site selection algorithm
  • Uncertainty analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecological Modeling

Cite this

Moilanen, A., Runge, M. C., Elith, J., Tyre, A., Carmel, Y., Fegraus, E., ... Ben-Haim, Y. (2006). Planning for robust reserve networks using uncertainty analysis. Ecological Modelling, 199(1), 115-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.004

Planning for robust reserve networks using uncertainty analysis. / Moilanen, Atte; Runge, Michael C.; Elith, Jane; Tyre, Andrew; Carmel, Yohay; Fegraus, Eric; Wintle, Brendan A.; Burgman, Mark; Ben-Haim, Yakov.

In: Ecological Modelling, Vol. 199, No. 1, 01.11.2006, p. 115-124.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moilanen, A, Runge, MC, Elith, J, Tyre, A, Carmel, Y, Fegraus, E, Wintle, BA, Burgman, M & Ben-Haim, Y 2006, 'Planning for robust reserve networks using uncertainty analysis', Ecological Modelling, vol. 199, no. 1, pp. 115-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.004
Moilanen, Atte ; Runge, Michael C. ; Elith, Jane ; Tyre, Andrew ; Carmel, Yohay ; Fegraus, Eric ; Wintle, Brendan A. ; Burgman, Mark ; Ben-Haim, Yakov. / Planning for robust reserve networks using uncertainty analysis. In: Ecological Modelling. 2006 ; Vol. 199, No. 1. pp. 115-124.
@article{00a174f13d944f05accc28332658029d,
title = "Planning for robust reserve networks using uncertainty analysis",
abstract = "Planning land-use for biodiversity conservation frequently involves computer-assisted reserve selection algorithms. Typically such algorithms operate on matrices of species presence-absence in sites, or on species-specific distributions of model predicted probabilities of occurrence in grid cells. There are practically always errors in input data-erroneous species presence-absence data, structural and parametric uncertainty in predictive habitat models, and lack of correspondence between temporal presence and long-run persistence. Despite these uncertainties, typical reserve selection methods proceed as if there is no uncertainty in the data or models. Having two conservation options of apparently equal biological value, one would prefer the option whose value is relatively insensitive to errors in planning inputs. In this work we show how uncertainty analysis for reserve planning can be implemented within a framework of information-gap decision theory, generating reserve designs that are robust to uncertainty. Consideration of uncertainty involves modifications to the typical objective functions used in reserve selection. Search for robust-optimal reserve structures can still be implemented via typical reserve selection optimization techniques, including stepwise heuristics, integer-programming and stochastic global search.",
keywords = "Conservation planning, Information-gap decision theory, Reserve selection, Site selection algorithm, Uncertainty analysis",
author = "Atte Moilanen and Runge, {Michael C.} and Jane Elith and Andrew Tyre and Yohay Carmel and Eric Fegraus and Wintle, {Brendan A.} and Mark Burgman and Yakov Ben-Haim",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "199",
pages = "115--124",
journal = "Ecological Modelling",
issn = "0304-3800",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Planning for robust reserve networks using uncertainty analysis

AU - Moilanen, Atte

AU - Runge, Michael C.

AU - Elith, Jane

AU - Tyre, Andrew

AU - Carmel, Yohay

AU - Fegraus, Eric

AU - Wintle, Brendan A.

AU - Burgman, Mark

AU - Ben-Haim, Yakov

PY - 2006/11/1

Y1 - 2006/11/1

N2 - Planning land-use for biodiversity conservation frequently involves computer-assisted reserve selection algorithms. Typically such algorithms operate on matrices of species presence-absence in sites, or on species-specific distributions of model predicted probabilities of occurrence in grid cells. There are practically always errors in input data-erroneous species presence-absence data, structural and parametric uncertainty in predictive habitat models, and lack of correspondence between temporal presence and long-run persistence. Despite these uncertainties, typical reserve selection methods proceed as if there is no uncertainty in the data or models. Having two conservation options of apparently equal biological value, one would prefer the option whose value is relatively insensitive to errors in planning inputs. In this work we show how uncertainty analysis for reserve planning can be implemented within a framework of information-gap decision theory, generating reserve designs that are robust to uncertainty. Consideration of uncertainty involves modifications to the typical objective functions used in reserve selection. Search for robust-optimal reserve structures can still be implemented via typical reserve selection optimization techniques, including stepwise heuristics, integer-programming and stochastic global search.

AB - Planning land-use for biodiversity conservation frequently involves computer-assisted reserve selection algorithms. Typically such algorithms operate on matrices of species presence-absence in sites, or on species-specific distributions of model predicted probabilities of occurrence in grid cells. There are practically always errors in input data-erroneous species presence-absence data, structural and parametric uncertainty in predictive habitat models, and lack of correspondence between temporal presence and long-run persistence. Despite these uncertainties, typical reserve selection methods proceed as if there is no uncertainty in the data or models. Having two conservation options of apparently equal biological value, one would prefer the option whose value is relatively insensitive to errors in planning inputs. In this work we show how uncertainty analysis for reserve planning can be implemented within a framework of information-gap decision theory, generating reserve designs that are robust to uncertainty. Consideration of uncertainty involves modifications to the typical objective functions used in reserve selection. Search for robust-optimal reserve structures can still be implemented via typical reserve selection optimization techniques, including stepwise heuristics, integer-programming and stochastic global search.

KW - Conservation planning

KW - Information-gap decision theory

KW - Reserve selection

KW - Site selection algorithm

KW - Uncertainty analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749160514&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749160514&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.004

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33749160514

VL - 199

SP - 115

EP - 124

JO - Ecological Modelling

JF - Ecological Modelling

SN - 0304-3800

IS - 1

ER -