Pitch ranking, electrode discrimination, and physiological spread of excitation using current steering in cochlear implants

Jenny L. Goehring, Donna L. Neff, Jacquelyn L. Baudhuin, Michelle L. Hughes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The first objective of this study was to determine whether adaptive pitch-ranking and electrode-discrimination tasks with cochlear-implant (CI) recipients produce similar results for perceiving intermediate "virtual-channel" pitch percepts using current steering. Previous studies have not examined both behavioral tasks in the same subjects with current steering. A second objective was to determine whether a physiological metric of spatial separation using the electrically evoked compound action potential spread-of-excitation (ECAP SOE) function could predict performance in the behavioral tasks. The metric was the separation index (Σ), defined as the difference in normalized amplitudes between two adjacent ECAP SOE functions, summed across all masker electrodes. Eleven CII or 90 K Advanced Bionics (Valencia, CA) recipients were tested using pairs of electrodes from the basal, middle, and apical portions of the electrode array. The behavioral results, expressed as d', showed no significant differences across tasks. There was also no significant effect of electrode region for either task. ECAP Σ was not significantly correlated with pitch ranking or electrode discrimination for any of the electrode regions. Therefore, the ECAP separation index is not sensitive enough to predict perceptual resolution of virtual channels.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3159-3171
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume136
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

ranking
discrimination
electrodes
excitation
bionics
Ranking
Cochlear Implant
Discrimination
Recipient

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Pitch ranking, electrode discrimination, and physiological spread of excitation using current steering in cochlear implants. / Goehring, Jenny L.; Neff, Donna L.; Baudhuin, Jacquelyn L.; Hughes, Michelle L.

In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 136, No. 6, 01.12.2014, p. 3159-3171.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Goehring, Jenny L. ; Neff, Donna L. ; Baudhuin, Jacquelyn L. ; Hughes, Michelle L. / Pitch ranking, electrode discrimination, and physiological spread of excitation using current steering in cochlear implants. In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2014 ; Vol. 136, No. 6. pp. 3159-3171.
@article{5d055b35149c4663a54706223225cc7c,
title = "Pitch ranking, electrode discrimination, and physiological spread of excitation using current steering in cochlear implants",
abstract = "The first objective of this study was to determine whether adaptive pitch-ranking and electrode-discrimination tasks with cochlear-implant (CI) recipients produce similar results for perceiving intermediate {"}virtual-channel{"} pitch percepts using current steering. Previous studies have not examined both behavioral tasks in the same subjects with current steering. A second objective was to determine whether a physiological metric of spatial separation using the electrically evoked compound action potential spread-of-excitation (ECAP SOE) function could predict performance in the behavioral tasks. The metric was the separation index (Σ), defined as the difference in normalized amplitudes between two adjacent ECAP SOE functions, summed across all masker electrodes. Eleven CII or 90 K Advanced Bionics (Valencia, CA) recipients were tested using pairs of electrodes from the basal, middle, and apical portions of the electrode array. The behavioral results, expressed as d', showed no significant differences across tasks. There was also no significant effect of electrode region for either task. ECAP Σ was not significantly correlated with pitch ranking or electrode discrimination for any of the electrode regions. Therefore, the ECAP separation index is not sensitive enough to predict perceptual resolution of virtual channels.",
author = "Goehring, {Jenny L.} and Neff, {Donna L.} and Baudhuin, {Jacquelyn L.} and Hughes, {Michelle L.}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1121/1.4900634",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "136",
pages = "3159--3171",
journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pitch ranking, electrode discrimination, and physiological spread of excitation using current steering in cochlear implants

AU - Goehring, Jenny L.

AU - Neff, Donna L.

AU - Baudhuin, Jacquelyn L.

AU - Hughes, Michelle L.

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - The first objective of this study was to determine whether adaptive pitch-ranking and electrode-discrimination tasks with cochlear-implant (CI) recipients produce similar results for perceiving intermediate "virtual-channel" pitch percepts using current steering. Previous studies have not examined both behavioral tasks in the same subjects with current steering. A second objective was to determine whether a physiological metric of spatial separation using the electrically evoked compound action potential spread-of-excitation (ECAP SOE) function could predict performance in the behavioral tasks. The metric was the separation index (Σ), defined as the difference in normalized amplitudes between two adjacent ECAP SOE functions, summed across all masker electrodes. Eleven CII or 90 K Advanced Bionics (Valencia, CA) recipients were tested using pairs of electrodes from the basal, middle, and apical portions of the electrode array. The behavioral results, expressed as d', showed no significant differences across tasks. There was also no significant effect of electrode region for either task. ECAP Σ was not significantly correlated with pitch ranking or electrode discrimination for any of the electrode regions. Therefore, the ECAP separation index is not sensitive enough to predict perceptual resolution of virtual channels.

AB - The first objective of this study was to determine whether adaptive pitch-ranking and electrode-discrimination tasks with cochlear-implant (CI) recipients produce similar results for perceiving intermediate "virtual-channel" pitch percepts using current steering. Previous studies have not examined both behavioral tasks in the same subjects with current steering. A second objective was to determine whether a physiological metric of spatial separation using the electrically evoked compound action potential spread-of-excitation (ECAP SOE) function could predict performance in the behavioral tasks. The metric was the separation index (Σ), defined as the difference in normalized amplitudes between two adjacent ECAP SOE functions, summed across all masker electrodes. Eleven CII or 90 K Advanced Bionics (Valencia, CA) recipients were tested using pairs of electrodes from the basal, middle, and apical portions of the electrode array. The behavioral results, expressed as d', showed no significant differences across tasks. There was also no significant effect of electrode region for either task. ECAP Σ was not significantly correlated with pitch ranking or electrode discrimination for any of the electrode regions. Therefore, the ECAP separation index is not sensitive enough to predict perceptual resolution of virtual channels.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84915789359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84915789359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.4900634

DO - 10.1121/1.4900634

M3 - Article

C2 - 25480063

AN - SCOPUS:84915789359

VL - 136

SP - 3159

EP - 3171

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 6

ER -