Permanent magnetism of dense-packed nanostructures

R. Skomski, Y. Liu, J. E. Shield, G. C. Hadjipanayis, D. J. Sellmyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The effect of nanostructuring on magnetostatic interactions in permanent magnets is investigated by model calculations. Emphasis is on the energy product as a function of packing fraction of the magnetic phase, of the magnet’s macroscopic shape, and of the nanoscale feature size. The main difference between nanostructured and macroscopic magnetic bodies, namely, the transition between coherent and incoherent reversal, has a far-reaching impact on demagnetizing field and energy product. For small magnet sizes, the energy product is substantially enlarged, up to [formula omitted] for soft magnetic materials, but this effect is difficult to exploit in real devices. In bulk magnets, the energy product depends on the packing fraction [formula omitted] of the soft phase and exhibits a maximum [formula omitted] for [formula omitted]. Nanoscale magnetization processes involve demagnetizing factors different from the macroscopic ones used to determine the optimum shape of permanent magnets. Confusion of these two types of demagnetizing fields yields unphysical mechanisms, such as hysteresis-loop overskewing and the addition of self-interaction fields to the external field.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalJournal of Applied Physics
Volume107
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2010

Fingerprint

magnets
products
permanent magnets
energy
confusion
magnetostatics
magnetic materials
hysteresis
interactions
magnetization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Permanent magnetism of dense-packed nanostructures. / Skomski, R.; Liu, Y.; Shield, J. E.; Hadjipanayis, G. C.; Sellmyer, D. J.

In: Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 107, No. 9, 01.05.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Skomski, R. ; Liu, Y. ; Shield, J. E. ; Hadjipanayis, G. C. ; Sellmyer, D. J. / Permanent magnetism of dense-packed nanostructures. In: Journal of Applied Physics. 2010 ; Vol. 107, No. 9.
@article{f890b8c6b64d446db3cb70cad3e8c8f7,
title = "Permanent magnetism of dense-packed nanostructures",
abstract = "The effect of nanostructuring on magnetostatic interactions in permanent magnets is investigated by model calculations. Emphasis is on the energy product as a function of packing fraction of the magnetic phase, of the magnet’s macroscopic shape, and of the nanoscale feature size. The main difference between nanostructured and macroscopic magnetic bodies, namely, the transition between coherent and incoherent reversal, has a far-reaching impact on demagnetizing field and energy product. For small magnet sizes, the energy product is substantially enlarged, up to [formula omitted] for soft magnetic materials, but this effect is difficult to exploit in real devices. In bulk magnets, the energy product depends on the packing fraction [formula omitted] of the soft phase and exhibits a maximum [formula omitted] for [formula omitted]. Nanoscale magnetization processes involve demagnetizing factors different from the macroscopic ones used to determine the optimum shape of permanent magnets. Confusion of these two types of demagnetizing fields yields unphysical mechanisms, such as hysteresis-loop overskewing and the addition of self-interaction fields to the external field.",
author = "R. Skomski and Y. Liu and Shield, {J. E.} and Hadjipanayis, {G. C.} and Sellmyer, {D. J.}",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1063/1.3337657",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "107",
journal = "Journal of Applied Physics",
issn = "0021-8979",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Permanent magnetism of dense-packed nanostructures

AU - Skomski, R.

AU - Liu, Y.

AU - Shield, J. E.

AU - Hadjipanayis, G. C.

AU - Sellmyer, D. J.

PY - 2010/5/1

Y1 - 2010/5/1

N2 - The effect of nanostructuring on magnetostatic interactions in permanent magnets is investigated by model calculations. Emphasis is on the energy product as a function of packing fraction of the magnetic phase, of the magnet’s macroscopic shape, and of the nanoscale feature size. The main difference between nanostructured and macroscopic magnetic bodies, namely, the transition between coherent and incoherent reversal, has a far-reaching impact on demagnetizing field and energy product. For small magnet sizes, the energy product is substantially enlarged, up to [formula omitted] for soft magnetic materials, but this effect is difficult to exploit in real devices. In bulk magnets, the energy product depends on the packing fraction [formula omitted] of the soft phase and exhibits a maximum [formula omitted] for [formula omitted]. Nanoscale magnetization processes involve demagnetizing factors different from the macroscopic ones used to determine the optimum shape of permanent magnets. Confusion of these two types of demagnetizing fields yields unphysical mechanisms, such as hysteresis-loop overskewing and the addition of self-interaction fields to the external field.

AB - The effect of nanostructuring on magnetostatic interactions in permanent magnets is investigated by model calculations. Emphasis is on the energy product as a function of packing fraction of the magnetic phase, of the magnet’s macroscopic shape, and of the nanoscale feature size. The main difference between nanostructured and macroscopic magnetic bodies, namely, the transition between coherent and incoherent reversal, has a far-reaching impact on demagnetizing field and energy product. For small magnet sizes, the energy product is substantially enlarged, up to [formula omitted] for soft magnetic materials, but this effect is difficult to exploit in real devices. In bulk magnets, the energy product depends on the packing fraction [formula omitted] of the soft phase and exhibits a maximum [formula omitted] for [formula omitted]. Nanoscale magnetization processes involve demagnetizing factors different from the macroscopic ones used to determine the optimum shape of permanent magnets. Confusion of these two types of demagnetizing fields yields unphysical mechanisms, such as hysteresis-loop overskewing and the addition of self-interaction fields to the external field.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024817271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024817271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1063/1.3337657

DO - 10.1063/1.3337657

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024817271

VL - 107

JO - Journal of Applied Physics

JF - Journal of Applied Physics

SN - 0021-8979

IS - 9

ER -