Period and Cohort Effects on Religious Nonaffiliation and Religious Disaffiliation: A Research Note

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Period and cohort effects on reports of no religious preference and religious disaffiliation are estimated. Results show that by 2006, the probability of reporting no religious preference had risen to almost .16. Additionally, the growing proportion of Americans raised with no religious preference substantially influences the increase in reporting no religious preference. Two recently developed analysis techniques for disentangling period and cohort effects are used: intrinsic estimator models and cross-classified, random-effects models. Results show (1) period-based increases in the probability of reporting no religious preference from 1990 to 2006, (2) across-cohort increases in no religious preference beginning with those born in the 1940s, and (3) a decline in the likelihood of religious disaffiliation (being raised with a religious preference but currently reporting no religious preference) for those born in the 1960s and 1970s compared to those born between 1945 and 1959.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)311-319
Number of pages9
JournalJournal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2010

Fingerprint

Religion
Cohort
Intrinsic
1960s
1970s
1940s
Proportion
Random Effects Model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Religious studies

Cite this

@article{c64e777447234726b2dc2b0975209079,
title = "Period and Cohort Effects on Religious Nonaffiliation and Religious Disaffiliation: A Research Note",
abstract = "Period and cohort effects on reports of no religious preference and religious disaffiliation are estimated. Results show that by 2006, the probability of reporting no religious preference had risen to almost .16. Additionally, the growing proportion of Americans raised with no religious preference substantially influences the increase in reporting no religious preference. Two recently developed analysis techniques for disentangling period and cohort effects are used: intrinsic estimator models and cross-classified, random-effects models. Results show (1) period-based increases in the probability of reporting no religious preference from 1990 to 2006, (2) across-cohort increases in no religious preference beginning with those born in the 1940s, and (3) a decline in the likelihood of religious disaffiliation (being raised with a religious preference but currently reporting no religious preference) for those born in the 1960s and 1970s compared to those born between 1945 and 1959.",
author = "Philip Schwadel",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01511.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "311--319",
journal = "Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion",
issn = "0021-8294",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Period and Cohort Effects on Religious Nonaffiliation and Religious Disaffiliation

T2 - A Research Note

AU - Schwadel, Philip

PY - 2010/6/1

Y1 - 2010/6/1

N2 - Period and cohort effects on reports of no religious preference and religious disaffiliation are estimated. Results show that by 2006, the probability of reporting no religious preference had risen to almost .16. Additionally, the growing proportion of Americans raised with no religious preference substantially influences the increase in reporting no religious preference. Two recently developed analysis techniques for disentangling period and cohort effects are used: intrinsic estimator models and cross-classified, random-effects models. Results show (1) period-based increases in the probability of reporting no religious preference from 1990 to 2006, (2) across-cohort increases in no religious preference beginning with those born in the 1940s, and (3) a decline in the likelihood of religious disaffiliation (being raised with a religious preference but currently reporting no religious preference) for those born in the 1960s and 1970s compared to those born between 1945 and 1959.

AB - Period and cohort effects on reports of no religious preference and religious disaffiliation are estimated. Results show that by 2006, the probability of reporting no religious preference had risen to almost .16. Additionally, the growing proportion of Americans raised with no religious preference substantially influences the increase in reporting no religious preference. Two recently developed analysis techniques for disentangling period and cohort effects are used: intrinsic estimator models and cross-classified, random-effects models. Results show (1) period-based increases in the probability of reporting no religious preference from 1990 to 2006, (2) across-cohort increases in no religious preference beginning with those born in the 1940s, and (3) a decline in the likelihood of religious disaffiliation (being raised with a religious preference but currently reporting no religious preference) for those born in the 1960s and 1970s compared to those born between 1945 and 1959.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954430414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954430414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01511.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01511.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77954430414

VL - 49

SP - 311

EP - 319

JO - Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

JF - Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

SN - 0021-8294

IS - 2

ER -