Perennial warm-season grasses for producing biofuel and enhancing soil properties: an alternative to corn residue removal

Humberto Blanco-Canqui, Robert B. Mitchell, Virginia L. Jin, Marty R. Schmer, Kent M. Eskridge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Removal of corn (Zea mays L.) residues at high rates for biofuel and other off-farm uses may negatively impact soil and the environment in the long term. Biomass removal from perennial warm-season grasses (WSGs) grown in marginally productive lands could be an alternative to corn residue removal as biofuel feedstocks while controlling water and wind erosion, sequestering carbon (C), cycling water and nutrients, and enhancing other soil ecosystem services. We compared wind and water erosion potential, soil compaction, soil hydraulic properties, soil organic C (SOC), and soil fertility between biomass removal from WSGs and corn residue removal from rainfed no-till continuous corn on a marginally productive site on a silty clay loam in eastern Nebraska after 2 and 3 years of management. The field-scale treatments were as follows: (i) switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.), (ii) big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman), and (iii) low-diversity grass mixture [big bluestem, indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans (L.) Nash), and sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula (Michx.) Torr.)], and (iv) 50% corn residue removal with three replications. Across years, corn residue removal increased wind-erodible fraction from 41% to 86% and reduced wet aggregate stability from 1.70 to 1.15 mm compared with WSGs in the upper 7.5 cm soil depth. Corn residue removal also reduced water retention by 15% between −33 and −300 kPa potentials and plant-available water by 25% in the upper 7.5 cm soil depth. However, corn residue removal did not affect final water infiltration, SOC concentration, soil fertility, and other properties. Overall, corn residue removal increases erosion potential and reduces water retention shortly after removal, suggesting that biomass removal from perennial WSGs is a desirable alternative to corn residue removal for biofuel production and maintenance of soil ecosystem services.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1510-1521
Number of pages12
JournalGCB Bioenergy
Volume9
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2017

Fingerprint

warm season grasses
Biofuels
biofuels
biofuel
soil properties
soil property
maize
grass
Soils
corn
Andropogon gerardii
Bouteloua curtipendula
water erosion
wind erosion
Panicum virgatum
Water
Erosion
organic soils
ecosystem services
Biomass

Keywords

  • biofuel
  • corn residue removal
  • perennial warm-season grass
  • soil organic carbon
  • soil properties

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Waste Management and Disposal

Cite this

Perennial warm-season grasses for producing biofuel and enhancing soil properties : an alternative to corn residue removal. / Blanco-Canqui, Humberto; Mitchell, Robert B.; Jin, Virginia L.; Schmer, Marty R.; Eskridge, Kent M.

In: GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 9, No. 9, 09.2017, p. 1510-1521.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blanco-Canqui, Humberto ; Mitchell, Robert B. ; Jin, Virginia L. ; Schmer, Marty R. ; Eskridge, Kent M. / Perennial warm-season grasses for producing biofuel and enhancing soil properties : an alternative to corn residue removal. In: GCB Bioenergy. 2017 ; Vol. 9, No. 9. pp. 1510-1521.
@article{50d53d52547f45f48a9c8ec307e2d40e,
title = "Perennial warm-season grasses for producing biofuel and enhancing soil properties: an alternative to corn residue removal",
abstract = "Removal of corn (Zea mays L.) residues at high rates for biofuel and other off-farm uses may negatively impact soil and the environment in the long term. Biomass removal from perennial warm-season grasses (WSGs) grown in marginally productive lands could be an alternative to corn residue removal as biofuel feedstocks while controlling water and wind erosion, sequestering carbon (C), cycling water and nutrients, and enhancing other soil ecosystem services. We compared wind and water erosion potential, soil compaction, soil hydraulic properties, soil organic C (SOC), and soil fertility between biomass removal from WSGs and corn residue removal from rainfed no-till continuous corn on a marginally productive site on a silty clay loam in eastern Nebraska after 2 and 3 years of management. The field-scale treatments were as follows: (i) switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.), (ii) big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman), and (iii) low-diversity grass mixture [big bluestem, indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans (L.) Nash), and sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula (Michx.) Torr.)], and (iv) 50{\%} corn residue removal with three replications. Across years, corn residue removal increased wind-erodible fraction from 41{\%} to 86{\%} and reduced wet aggregate stability from 1.70 to 1.15 mm compared with WSGs in the upper 7.5 cm soil depth. Corn residue removal also reduced water retention by 15{\%} between −33 and −300 kPa potentials and plant-available water by 25{\%} in the upper 7.5 cm soil depth. However, corn residue removal did not affect final water infiltration, SOC concentration, soil fertility, and other properties. Overall, corn residue removal increases erosion potential and reduces water retention shortly after removal, suggesting that biomass removal from perennial WSGs is a desirable alternative to corn residue removal for biofuel production and maintenance of soil ecosystem services.",
keywords = "biofuel, corn residue removal, perennial warm-season grass, soil organic carbon, soil properties",
author = "Humberto Blanco-Canqui and Mitchell, {Robert B.} and Jin, {Virginia L.} and Schmer, {Marty R.} and Eskridge, {Kent M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/gcbb.12436",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "1510--1521",
journal = "GCB Bioenergy",
issn = "1757-1693",
publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perennial warm-season grasses for producing biofuel and enhancing soil properties

T2 - an alternative to corn residue removal

AU - Blanco-Canqui, Humberto

AU - Mitchell, Robert B.

AU - Jin, Virginia L.

AU - Schmer, Marty R.

AU - Eskridge, Kent M.

PY - 2017/9

Y1 - 2017/9

N2 - Removal of corn (Zea mays L.) residues at high rates for biofuel and other off-farm uses may negatively impact soil and the environment in the long term. Biomass removal from perennial warm-season grasses (WSGs) grown in marginally productive lands could be an alternative to corn residue removal as biofuel feedstocks while controlling water and wind erosion, sequestering carbon (C), cycling water and nutrients, and enhancing other soil ecosystem services. We compared wind and water erosion potential, soil compaction, soil hydraulic properties, soil organic C (SOC), and soil fertility between biomass removal from WSGs and corn residue removal from rainfed no-till continuous corn on a marginally productive site on a silty clay loam in eastern Nebraska after 2 and 3 years of management. The field-scale treatments were as follows: (i) switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.), (ii) big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman), and (iii) low-diversity grass mixture [big bluestem, indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans (L.) Nash), and sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula (Michx.) Torr.)], and (iv) 50% corn residue removal with three replications. Across years, corn residue removal increased wind-erodible fraction from 41% to 86% and reduced wet aggregate stability from 1.70 to 1.15 mm compared with WSGs in the upper 7.5 cm soil depth. Corn residue removal also reduced water retention by 15% between −33 and −300 kPa potentials and plant-available water by 25% in the upper 7.5 cm soil depth. However, corn residue removal did not affect final water infiltration, SOC concentration, soil fertility, and other properties. Overall, corn residue removal increases erosion potential and reduces water retention shortly after removal, suggesting that biomass removal from perennial WSGs is a desirable alternative to corn residue removal for biofuel production and maintenance of soil ecosystem services.

AB - Removal of corn (Zea mays L.) residues at high rates for biofuel and other off-farm uses may negatively impact soil and the environment in the long term. Biomass removal from perennial warm-season grasses (WSGs) grown in marginally productive lands could be an alternative to corn residue removal as biofuel feedstocks while controlling water and wind erosion, sequestering carbon (C), cycling water and nutrients, and enhancing other soil ecosystem services. We compared wind and water erosion potential, soil compaction, soil hydraulic properties, soil organic C (SOC), and soil fertility between biomass removal from WSGs and corn residue removal from rainfed no-till continuous corn on a marginally productive site on a silty clay loam in eastern Nebraska after 2 and 3 years of management. The field-scale treatments were as follows: (i) switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.), (ii) big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman), and (iii) low-diversity grass mixture [big bluestem, indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans (L.) Nash), and sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula (Michx.) Torr.)], and (iv) 50% corn residue removal with three replications. Across years, corn residue removal increased wind-erodible fraction from 41% to 86% and reduced wet aggregate stability from 1.70 to 1.15 mm compared with WSGs in the upper 7.5 cm soil depth. Corn residue removal also reduced water retention by 15% between −33 and −300 kPa potentials and plant-available water by 25% in the upper 7.5 cm soil depth. However, corn residue removal did not affect final water infiltration, SOC concentration, soil fertility, and other properties. Overall, corn residue removal increases erosion potential and reduces water retention shortly after removal, suggesting that biomass removal from perennial WSGs is a desirable alternative to corn residue removal for biofuel production and maintenance of soil ecosystem services.

KW - biofuel

KW - corn residue removal

KW - perennial warm-season grass

KW - soil organic carbon

KW - soil properties

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015233836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015233836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/gcbb.12436

DO - 10.1111/gcbb.12436

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85015233836

VL - 9

SP - 1510

EP - 1521

JO - GCB Bioenergy

JF - GCB Bioenergy

SN - 1757-1693

IS - 9

ER -