Perceptions of sexual harassment: The effects of gender, legal standard, and ambivalent sexism

Richard L. Wiener, Linda Hurt, Brenda Russell, Kelley Mannen, Charles Gasper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research tests the possibility that the reasonable woman as compared to the reasonable person test of hostile work environment sexual harassment interacts with hostile and benevolent sexist beliefs and under some conditions triggers protectionist attitudes toward women who complain of sexual harassment. We administered to a sample of undergraduates the ambivalent sexism inventory along with the fact patterns in two harassment cases and asked them to make legally relevant decisions under either the reasonable woman or person standard. We found that those high in hostile sexism, and women, found more evidence of harassment. However, those high in benevolent sexism did not exhibit the hostile sexism effects. Although men were less sensitive to the reasonable woman standard than women, under some conditions the reasonable woman standard enabled both genders to find greater evidence of harassment. The results are discussed from the perspectives of law and psychology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)71-93
Number of pages23
JournalLaw and human behavior
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 28 1997

Fingerprint

Sexual Harassment
Sexism
sexism
sexual harassment
gender
human being
work environment
evidence
psychology
Psychology
Equipment and Supplies
Law

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Law

Cite this

Perceptions of sexual harassment : The effects of gender, legal standard, and ambivalent sexism. / Wiener, Richard L.; Hurt, Linda; Russell, Brenda; Mannen, Kelley; Gasper, Charles.

In: Law and human behavior, Vol. 21, No. 1, 28.02.1997, p. 71-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wiener, Richard L. ; Hurt, Linda ; Russell, Brenda ; Mannen, Kelley ; Gasper, Charles. / Perceptions of sexual harassment : The effects of gender, legal standard, and ambivalent sexism. In: Law and human behavior. 1997 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 71-93.
@article{e30d49e2384242428c05a725abea6889,
title = "Perceptions of sexual harassment: The effects of gender, legal standard, and ambivalent sexism",
abstract = "This research tests the possibility that the reasonable woman as compared to the reasonable person test of hostile work environment sexual harassment interacts with hostile and benevolent sexist beliefs and under some conditions triggers protectionist attitudes toward women who complain of sexual harassment. We administered to a sample of undergraduates the ambivalent sexism inventory along with the fact patterns in two harassment cases and asked them to make legally relevant decisions under either the reasonable woman or person standard. We found that those high in hostile sexism, and women, found more evidence of harassment. However, those high in benevolent sexism did not exhibit the hostile sexism effects. Although men were less sensitive to the reasonable woman standard than women, under some conditions the reasonable woman standard enabled both genders to find greater evidence of harassment. The results are discussed from the perspectives of law and psychology.",
author = "Wiener, {Richard L.} and Linda Hurt and Brenda Russell and Kelley Mannen and Charles Gasper",
year = "1997",
month = "2",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1023/A:1024818110678",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "71--93",
journal = "Law and Human Behavior",
issn = "0147-7307",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptions of sexual harassment

T2 - The effects of gender, legal standard, and ambivalent sexism

AU - Wiener, Richard L.

AU - Hurt, Linda

AU - Russell, Brenda

AU - Mannen, Kelley

AU - Gasper, Charles

PY - 1997/2/28

Y1 - 1997/2/28

N2 - This research tests the possibility that the reasonable woman as compared to the reasonable person test of hostile work environment sexual harassment interacts with hostile and benevolent sexist beliefs and under some conditions triggers protectionist attitudes toward women who complain of sexual harassment. We administered to a sample of undergraduates the ambivalent sexism inventory along with the fact patterns in two harassment cases and asked them to make legally relevant decisions under either the reasonable woman or person standard. We found that those high in hostile sexism, and women, found more evidence of harassment. However, those high in benevolent sexism did not exhibit the hostile sexism effects. Although men were less sensitive to the reasonable woman standard than women, under some conditions the reasonable woman standard enabled both genders to find greater evidence of harassment. The results are discussed from the perspectives of law and psychology.

AB - This research tests the possibility that the reasonable woman as compared to the reasonable person test of hostile work environment sexual harassment interacts with hostile and benevolent sexist beliefs and under some conditions triggers protectionist attitudes toward women who complain of sexual harassment. We administered to a sample of undergraduates the ambivalent sexism inventory along with the fact patterns in two harassment cases and asked them to make legally relevant decisions under either the reasonable woman or person standard. We found that those high in hostile sexism, and women, found more evidence of harassment. However, those high in benevolent sexism did not exhibit the hostile sexism effects. Although men were less sensitive to the reasonable woman standard than women, under some conditions the reasonable woman standard enabled both genders to find greater evidence of harassment. The results are discussed from the perspectives of law and psychology.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031045378&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031045378&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1024818110678

DO - 10.1023/A:1024818110678

M3 - Article

C2 - 9058574

AN - SCOPUS:0031045378

VL - 21

SP - 71

EP - 93

JO - Law and Human Behavior

JF - Law and Human Behavior

SN - 0147-7307

IS - 1

ER -