Perceptions of scholarly standards in technical publication

S. Olbina, K. Grosskopf, T. Johns, M. Scicchitano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In fall of 2007, a survey was administered to the membership of the Associated Schools of Construction (ASC) to evaluate member perspectives on scholarly standards as they relate to the International Journal of Construction Education and Research (Journal). The objectives of this study were to 1) survey respondent understanding of Journal aims and scope, 2) assess respondent interpretations of scholarly work, and 3) survey respondent attitudes on the overall effectiveness of the Journal submission and peer-review process. Of 106 respondents, 74% had previously published or reviewed for the Journal. While 65% of respondents indicated that the aim of the Journal was to publish scholarly works in both construction education and research, respondents were near equally divided on whether non-original research constitutes scholarly work. Respondents agreed or strongly agreed that Journal topics (87%), title (93%), and assessment criteria (83%) were appropriate. Ninety-four percent of peer reviewers felt the Journal review process was timely and efficient, compared with 78% of authors. Only 66% of authors felt peer reviewers had the knowledge necessary to effectively review their manuscripts. More than three in four (76%) reviewers stated that they relied more on their own intuition than Journal guidelines when conducting peer reviews. Of all respondents, two-thirds (66%) consider the Journal to be a top tier publication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)210-226
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Construction Education and Research
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2008

Fingerprint

peer review
assessment criteria
Education
intuition
education
interpretation
school

Keywords

  • Assessment criteria
  • Construction education
  • Construction research
  • Guidelines
  • Peer review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Building and Construction
  • Education

Cite this

Perceptions of scholarly standards in technical publication. / Olbina, S.; Grosskopf, K.; Johns, T.; Scicchitano, M.

In: International Journal of Construction Education and Research, Vol. 4, No. 3, 01.09.2008, p. 210-226.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a5a0b08f8d3b4cc983bd53ba3b475465,
title = "Perceptions of scholarly standards in technical publication",
abstract = "In fall of 2007, a survey was administered to the membership of the Associated Schools of Construction (ASC) to evaluate member perspectives on scholarly standards as they relate to the International Journal of Construction Education and Research (Journal). The objectives of this study were to 1) survey respondent understanding of Journal aims and scope, 2) assess respondent interpretations of scholarly work, and 3) survey respondent attitudes on the overall effectiveness of the Journal submission and peer-review process. Of 106 respondents, 74{\%} had previously published or reviewed for the Journal. While 65{\%} of respondents indicated that the aim of the Journal was to publish scholarly works in both construction education and research, respondents were near equally divided on whether non-original research constitutes scholarly work. Respondents agreed or strongly agreed that Journal topics (87{\%}), title (93{\%}), and assessment criteria (83{\%}) were appropriate. Ninety-four percent of peer reviewers felt the Journal review process was timely and efficient, compared with 78{\%} of authors. Only 66{\%} of authors felt peer reviewers had the knowledge necessary to effectively review their manuscripts. More than three in four (76{\%}) reviewers stated that they relied more on their own intuition than Journal guidelines when conducting peer reviews. Of all respondents, two-thirds (66{\%}) consider the Journal to be a top tier publication.",
keywords = "Assessment criteria, Construction education, Construction research, Guidelines, Peer review",
author = "S. Olbina and K. Grosskopf and T. Johns and M. Scicchitano",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15578770802494656",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "210--226",
journal = "International Journal of Construction Education and Research",
issn = "1550-3984",
publisher = "Brigham Young University",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptions of scholarly standards in technical publication

AU - Olbina, S.

AU - Grosskopf, K.

AU - Johns, T.

AU - Scicchitano, M.

PY - 2008/9/1

Y1 - 2008/9/1

N2 - In fall of 2007, a survey was administered to the membership of the Associated Schools of Construction (ASC) to evaluate member perspectives on scholarly standards as they relate to the International Journal of Construction Education and Research (Journal). The objectives of this study were to 1) survey respondent understanding of Journal aims and scope, 2) assess respondent interpretations of scholarly work, and 3) survey respondent attitudes on the overall effectiveness of the Journal submission and peer-review process. Of 106 respondents, 74% had previously published or reviewed for the Journal. While 65% of respondents indicated that the aim of the Journal was to publish scholarly works in both construction education and research, respondents were near equally divided on whether non-original research constitutes scholarly work. Respondents agreed or strongly agreed that Journal topics (87%), title (93%), and assessment criteria (83%) were appropriate. Ninety-four percent of peer reviewers felt the Journal review process was timely and efficient, compared with 78% of authors. Only 66% of authors felt peer reviewers had the knowledge necessary to effectively review their manuscripts. More than three in four (76%) reviewers stated that they relied more on their own intuition than Journal guidelines when conducting peer reviews. Of all respondents, two-thirds (66%) consider the Journal to be a top tier publication.

AB - In fall of 2007, a survey was administered to the membership of the Associated Schools of Construction (ASC) to evaluate member perspectives on scholarly standards as they relate to the International Journal of Construction Education and Research (Journal). The objectives of this study were to 1) survey respondent understanding of Journal aims and scope, 2) assess respondent interpretations of scholarly work, and 3) survey respondent attitudes on the overall effectiveness of the Journal submission and peer-review process. Of 106 respondents, 74% had previously published or reviewed for the Journal. While 65% of respondents indicated that the aim of the Journal was to publish scholarly works in both construction education and research, respondents were near equally divided on whether non-original research constitutes scholarly work. Respondents agreed or strongly agreed that Journal topics (87%), title (93%), and assessment criteria (83%) were appropriate. Ninety-four percent of peer reviewers felt the Journal review process was timely and efficient, compared with 78% of authors. Only 66% of authors felt peer reviewers had the knowledge necessary to effectively review their manuscripts. More than three in four (76%) reviewers stated that they relied more on their own intuition than Journal guidelines when conducting peer reviews. Of all respondents, two-thirds (66%) consider the Journal to be a top tier publication.

KW - Assessment criteria

KW - Construction education

KW - Construction research

KW - Guidelines

KW - Peer review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57049181271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57049181271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15578770802494656

DO - 10.1080/15578770802494656

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:57049181271

VL - 4

SP - 210

EP - 226

JO - International Journal of Construction Education and Research

JF - International Journal of Construction Education and Research

SN - 1550-3984

IS - 3

ER -