Perceived listening effort for a tonal task with contralateral competing signals

William J. Bologna, Monita Chatterjee, Judy R. Dubno

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Perceived listening effort was assessed for a monaural irregular-rhythm detection task while competing signals were presented to the contralateral ear. When speech was the competing signal, listeners reported greater listening effort compared to either contralateral steady-state noise or no competing signal. Behavioral thresholds for irregular-rhythm detection were unaffected by competing speech, indicating that listeners compensated for this competing signal with effortful listening. These results suggest that perceived listening effort may be associated with suppression of task-irrelevant information, even for conditions where informational masking and competition for linguistic processing resources would not be expected.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)EL352-EL358
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume134
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 17 2013

Fingerprint

rhythm
linguistics
ear
masking
resources
retarding
thresholds
Tonal
Irregular
Rhythm
Listeners
Masking
Suppression
Resources
Ear

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Perceived listening effort for a tonal task with contralateral competing signals. / Bologna, William J.; Chatterjee, Monita; Dubno, Judy R.

In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 134, No. 4, 17.10.2013, p. EL352-EL358.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3a75f834d2c84df5b059db9c8180161e,
title = "Perceived listening effort for a tonal task with contralateral competing signals",
abstract = "Perceived listening effort was assessed for a monaural irregular-rhythm detection task while competing signals were presented to the contralateral ear. When speech was the competing signal, listeners reported greater listening effort compared to either contralateral steady-state noise or no competing signal. Behavioral thresholds for irregular-rhythm detection were unaffected by competing speech, indicating that listeners compensated for this competing signal with effortful listening. These results suggest that perceived listening effort may be associated with suppression of task-irrelevant information, even for conditions where informational masking and competition for linguistic processing resources would not be expected.",
author = "Bologna, {William J.} and Monita Chatterjee and Dubno, {Judy R.}",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1121/1.4820808",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "134",
pages = "EL352--EL358",
journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceived listening effort for a tonal task with contralateral competing signals

AU - Bologna, William J.

AU - Chatterjee, Monita

AU - Dubno, Judy R.

PY - 2013/10/17

Y1 - 2013/10/17

N2 - Perceived listening effort was assessed for a monaural irregular-rhythm detection task while competing signals were presented to the contralateral ear. When speech was the competing signal, listeners reported greater listening effort compared to either contralateral steady-state noise or no competing signal. Behavioral thresholds for irregular-rhythm detection were unaffected by competing speech, indicating that listeners compensated for this competing signal with effortful listening. These results suggest that perceived listening effort may be associated with suppression of task-irrelevant information, even for conditions where informational masking and competition for linguistic processing resources would not be expected.

AB - Perceived listening effort was assessed for a monaural irregular-rhythm detection task while competing signals were presented to the contralateral ear. When speech was the competing signal, listeners reported greater listening effort compared to either contralateral steady-state noise or no competing signal. Behavioral thresholds for irregular-rhythm detection were unaffected by competing speech, indicating that listeners compensated for this competing signal with effortful listening. These results suggest that perceived listening effort may be associated with suppression of task-irrelevant information, even for conditions where informational masking and competition for linguistic processing resources would not be expected.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885406178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885406178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.4820808

DO - 10.1121/1.4820808

M3 - Article

C2 - 24116542

AN - SCOPUS:84885406178

VL - 134

SP - EL352-EL358

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 4

ER -