Pelvic inlet and outlet radiographs redefined

William M. Ricci, Christiaan Mamczak, Martin Tynan, Philipp Streubel, Michael Gardner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Musculoskeletal plain radiographic imaging protocols are typically predicated on orthogonal views of the bone or joint being evaluated. Pelvic injury has been evaluated with 45° inlet and 45° outlet radiographs. While these views are perpendicular to each other, they may not be in the best plane to evaluate pelvic injury because of variable lumbopelvic anatomy. We hypothesized that inlet and outlet radiographic views optimized to examine the clinically relevant osseous landmarks vary substantially from routine 45° inlet and outlet views. Methods: Sixty-eight consecutive patients without pelvic ring disruption who had undergone routine axial pelvic computed tomography scans were retrospectively identified. The optimal inlet and outlet angles required to profile the clinically relevant pelvic anatomy were quantified for each patient with use of sagittal computed tomography reconstructions. Results: The optimal inlet angle to profile the anterior body of S1 required an average caudal tilt of 21°. The average outlet angle (cephalad tilt) perpendicular to the body of S1 was 63° and perpendicular to S2 was 57°. The optimal angles were the same for male and female patients and for patients with normal and dysmorphic pelves and were independent of patient age. Conclusions: Screening inlet and screening outlet radiographs made at 25° and 60°, respectively, are recommended to provide accurate profiles of the clinically relevant posterior osseous pelvic anatomy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1947-1953
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A
Volume92
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 18 2010

Fingerprint

Anatomy
Tomography
Wounds and Injuries
Pelvis
Joints
Bone and Bones

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Pelvic inlet and outlet radiographs redefined. / Ricci, William M.; Mamczak, Christiaan; Tynan, Martin; Streubel, Philipp; Gardner, Michael.

In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A, Vol. 92, No. 10, 18.08.2010, p. 1947-1953.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ricci, William M. ; Mamczak, Christiaan ; Tynan, Martin ; Streubel, Philipp ; Gardner, Michael. / Pelvic inlet and outlet radiographs redefined. In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A. 2010 ; Vol. 92, No. 10. pp. 1947-1953.
@article{cc937828bf3b41439d13dfde5bb20bc7,
title = "Pelvic inlet and outlet radiographs redefined",
abstract = "Background: Musculoskeletal plain radiographic imaging protocols are typically predicated on orthogonal views of the bone or joint being evaluated. Pelvic injury has been evaluated with 45° inlet and 45° outlet radiographs. While these views are perpendicular to each other, they may not be in the best plane to evaluate pelvic injury because of variable lumbopelvic anatomy. We hypothesized that inlet and outlet radiographic views optimized to examine the clinically relevant osseous landmarks vary substantially from routine 45° inlet and outlet views. Methods: Sixty-eight consecutive patients without pelvic ring disruption who had undergone routine axial pelvic computed tomography scans were retrospectively identified. The optimal inlet and outlet angles required to profile the clinically relevant pelvic anatomy were quantified for each patient with use of sagittal computed tomography reconstructions. Results: The optimal inlet angle to profile the anterior body of S1 required an average caudal tilt of 21°. The average outlet angle (cephalad tilt) perpendicular to the body of S1 was 63° and perpendicular to S2 was 57°. The optimal angles were the same for male and female patients and for patients with normal and dysmorphic pelves and were independent of patient age. Conclusions: Screening inlet and screening outlet radiographs made at 25° and 60°, respectively, are recommended to provide accurate profiles of the clinically relevant posterior osseous pelvic anatomy.",
author = "Ricci, {William M.} and Christiaan Mamczak and Martin Tynan and Philipp Streubel and Michael Gardner",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
day = "18",
doi = "10.2106/JBJS.I.01580",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "92",
pages = "1947--1953",
journal = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A",
issn = "0021-9355",
publisher = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pelvic inlet and outlet radiographs redefined

AU - Ricci, William M.

AU - Mamczak, Christiaan

AU - Tynan, Martin

AU - Streubel, Philipp

AU - Gardner, Michael

PY - 2010/8/18

Y1 - 2010/8/18

N2 - Background: Musculoskeletal plain radiographic imaging protocols are typically predicated on orthogonal views of the bone or joint being evaluated. Pelvic injury has been evaluated with 45° inlet and 45° outlet radiographs. While these views are perpendicular to each other, they may not be in the best plane to evaluate pelvic injury because of variable lumbopelvic anatomy. We hypothesized that inlet and outlet radiographic views optimized to examine the clinically relevant osseous landmarks vary substantially from routine 45° inlet and outlet views. Methods: Sixty-eight consecutive patients without pelvic ring disruption who had undergone routine axial pelvic computed tomography scans were retrospectively identified. The optimal inlet and outlet angles required to profile the clinically relevant pelvic anatomy were quantified for each patient with use of sagittal computed tomography reconstructions. Results: The optimal inlet angle to profile the anterior body of S1 required an average caudal tilt of 21°. The average outlet angle (cephalad tilt) perpendicular to the body of S1 was 63° and perpendicular to S2 was 57°. The optimal angles were the same for male and female patients and for patients with normal and dysmorphic pelves and were independent of patient age. Conclusions: Screening inlet and screening outlet radiographs made at 25° and 60°, respectively, are recommended to provide accurate profiles of the clinically relevant posterior osseous pelvic anatomy.

AB - Background: Musculoskeletal plain radiographic imaging protocols are typically predicated on orthogonal views of the bone or joint being evaluated. Pelvic injury has been evaluated with 45° inlet and 45° outlet radiographs. While these views are perpendicular to each other, they may not be in the best plane to evaluate pelvic injury because of variable lumbopelvic anatomy. We hypothesized that inlet and outlet radiographic views optimized to examine the clinically relevant osseous landmarks vary substantially from routine 45° inlet and outlet views. Methods: Sixty-eight consecutive patients without pelvic ring disruption who had undergone routine axial pelvic computed tomography scans were retrospectively identified. The optimal inlet and outlet angles required to profile the clinically relevant pelvic anatomy were quantified for each patient with use of sagittal computed tomography reconstructions. Results: The optimal inlet angle to profile the anterior body of S1 required an average caudal tilt of 21°. The average outlet angle (cephalad tilt) perpendicular to the body of S1 was 63° and perpendicular to S2 was 57°. The optimal angles were the same for male and female patients and for patients with normal and dysmorphic pelves and were independent of patient age. Conclusions: Screening inlet and screening outlet radiographs made at 25° and 60°, respectively, are recommended to provide accurate profiles of the clinically relevant posterior osseous pelvic anatomy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956626225&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956626225&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2106/JBJS.I.01580

DO - 10.2106/JBJS.I.01580

M3 - Article

C2 - 20720137

AN - SCOPUS:77956626225

VL - 92

SP - 1947

EP - 1953

JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A

JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A

SN - 0021-9355

IS - 10

ER -