Pediatric clerkship experience and performance in the Nebraska education consortium

A community vs university comparison

Fredrick A. McCurdy, Gary L. Beck, Jeffrey P. Kollath, James Lloyd Harper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare the reported experiences and performance on end- of-course examinations of students completing their pediatric clerkship at the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC), Omaha, with that of students completing their clerkship in a community pediatrician's practice (CPP) outside the Omaha metropolitan area. Design: Cohort study. Setting: Private and/or institutional practices with both ambulatory and hospital components. Participants: For the academic year 1996-1997, all 113 students completing the 8-week third-year pediatric clerkship returned a questionnaire detailing their opinions of the experience. They also completed written (multiple-choice and essay questions) and oral (standardized parent interview) examinations, locally prepared and based on clerkship curriculum objectives provided to the students at orientation. Prior to student placement in the CPP, the clerkship goals, content, and evaluation methods as well as techniques for teaching in a busy office practice were reviewed with the CPP physicians. Eighty-one students performed their clerkship at UNMC while 31 spent all but the first week of the clerkship in the CPP. Main Outcome Measures: The students' opinions about their experiences and their performances on the end-of-course examinations were compared. Statistical analysis of the questionnaire was done using the Fisher exact test and the Mantel-Haenszel χ2 test while examination performance was compared using the t test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: The UNMC and CPP groups reported similar opinions of their experiences in the newborn nursery and the inpatient portion of the clerkship, but the CPP students were much more positive about their learning experience in the clinic (P =. 001). The CPP students reported more involvement in the patient's overall care (P<.001) and in other aspects of clinic operation (P<.001). The UNMC and CPP students had similar opinions of curriculum content, reading material, and didactic instruction. No group differences were found regarding interest in pediatrics as a career. Most importantly, no group differences were found in performance on any portion of the end-of-course examinations. Conclusions: Community- based education at the third-year clerkship level can be accomplished without a significant effect on student examination performance if students and faculty are aware of and adhere to a common set of goals. The end result is a much more robust experience for students who spend the clerkship in the practice of a community-based pediatrician.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)989-994
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine
Volume153
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1999

Fingerprint

Pediatrics
Students
Education
Nonparametric Statistics
Curriculum
Institutional Practice
Pediatricians
Nurseries
Private Practice
Reading
Inpatients
Patient Care
Teaching
Cohort Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Learning
Newborn Infant
Interviews
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Pediatric clerkship experience and performance in the Nebraska education consortium : A community vs university comparison. / McCurdy, Fredrick A.; Beck, Gary L.; Kollath, Jeffrey P.; Harper, James Lloyd.

In: Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Vol. 153, No. 9, 01.01.1999, p. 989-994.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a9f15915849d4f3fb71f1e9238afdd15,
title = "Pediatric clerkship experience and performance in the Nebraska education consortium: A community vs university comparison",
abstract = "Objective: To compare the reported experiences and performance on end- of-course examinations of students completing their pediatric clerkship at the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC), Omaha, with that of students completing their clerkship in a community pediatrician's practice (CPP) outside the Omaha metropolitan area. Design: Cohort study. Setting: Private and/or institutional practices with both ambulatory and hospital components. Participants: For the academic year 1996-1997, all 113 students completing the 8-week third-year pediatric clerkship returned a questionnaire detailing their opinions of the experience. They also completed written (multiple-choice and essay questions) and oral (standardized parent interview) examinations, locally prepared and based on clerkship curriculum objectives provided to the students at orientation. Prior to student placement in the CPP, the clerkship goals, content, and evaluation methods as well as techniques for teaching in a busy office practice were reviewed with the CPP physicians. Eighty-one students performed their clerkship at UNMC while 31 spent all but the first week of the clerkship in the CPP. Main Outcome Measures: The students' opinions about their experiences and their performances on the end-of-course examinations were compared. Statistical analysis of the questionnaire was done using the Fisher exact test and the Mantel-Haenszel χ2 test while examination performance was compared using the t test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: The UNMC and CPP groups reported similar opinions of their experiences in the newborn nursery and the inpatient portion of the clerkship, but the CPP students were much more positive about their learning experience in the clinic (P =. 001). The CPP students reported more involvement in the patient's overall care (P<.001) and in other aspects of clinic operation (P<.001). The UNMC and CPP students had similar opinions of curriculum content, reading material, and didactic instruction. No group differences were found regarding interest in pediatrics as a career. Most importantly, no group differences were found in performance on any portion of the end-of-course examinations. Conclusions: Community- based education at the third-year clerkship level can be accomplished without a significant effect on student examination performance if students and faculty are aware of and adhere to a common set of goals. The end result is a much more robust experience for students who spend the clerkship in the practice of a community-based pediatrician.",
author = "McCurdy, {Fredrick A.} and Beck, {Gary L.} and Kollath, {Jeffrey P.} and Harper, {James Lloyd}",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/archpedi.153.9.989",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "153",
pages = "989--994",
journal = "JAMA Pediatrics",
issn = "2168-6203",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pediatric clerkship experience and performance in the Nebraska education consortium

T2 - A community vs university comparison

AU - McCurdy, Fredrick A.

AU - Beck, Gary L.

AU - Kollath, Jeffrey P.

AU - Harper, James Lloyd

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - Objective: To compare the reported experiences and performance on end- of-course examinations of students completing their pediatric clerkship at the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC), Omaha, with that of students completing their clerkship in a community pediatrician's practice (CPP) outside the Omaha metropolitan area. Design: Cohort study. Setting: Private and/or institutional practices with both ambulatory and hospital components. Participants: For the academic year 1996-1997, all 113 students completing the 8-week third-year pediatric clerkship returned a questionnaire detailing their opinions of the experience. They also completed written (multiple-choice and essay questions) and oral (standardized parent interview) examinations, locally prepared and based on clerkship curriculum objectives provided to the students at orientation. Prior to student placement in the CPP, the clerkship goals, content, and evaluation methods as well as techniques for teaching in a busy office practice were reviewed with the CPP physicians. Eighty-one students performed their clerkship at UNMC while 31 spent all but the first week of the clerkship in the CPP. Main Outcome Measures: The students' opinions about their experiences and their performances on the end-of-course examinations were compared. Statistical analysis of the questionnaire was done using the Fisher exact test and the Mantel-Haenszel χ2 test while examination performance was compared using the t test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: The UNMC and CPP groups reported similar opinions of their experiences in the newborn nursery and the inpatient portion of the clerkship, but the CPP students were much more positive about their learning experience in the clinic (P =. 001). The CPP students reported more involvement in the patient's overall care (P<.001) and in other aspects of clinic operation (P<.001). The UNMC and CPP students had similar opinions of curriculum content, reading material, and didactic instruction. No group differences were found regarding interest in pediatrics as a career. Most importantly, no group differences were found in performance on any portion of the end-of-course examinations. Conclusions: Community- based education at the third-year clerkship level can be accomplished without a significant effect on student examination performance if students and faculty are aware of and adhere to a common set of goals. The end result is a much more robust experience for students who spend the clerkship in the practice of a community-based pediatrician.

AB - Objective: To compare the reported experiences and performance on end- of-course examinations of students completing their pediatric clerkship at the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC), Omaha, with that of students completing their clerkship in a community pediatrician's practice (CPP) outside the Omaha metropolitan area. Design: Cohort study. Setting: Private and/or institutional practices with both ambulatory and hospital components. Participants: For the academic year 1996-1997, all 113 students completing the 8-week third-year pediatric clerkship returned a questionnaire detailing their opinions of the experience. They also completed written (multiple-choice and essay questions) and oral (standardized parent interview) examinations, locally prepared and based on clerkship curriculum objectives provided to the students at orientation. Prior to student placement in the CPP, the clerkship goals, content, and evaluation methods as well as techniques for teaching in a busy office practice were reviewed with the CPP physicians. Eighty-one students performed their clerkship at UNMC while 31 spent all but the first week of the clerkship in the CPP. Main Outcome Measures: The students' opinions about their experiences and their performances on the end-of-course examinations were compared. Statistical analysis of the questionnaire was done using the Fisher exact test and the Mantel-Haenszel χ2 test while examination performance was compared using the t test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: The UNMC and CPP groups reported similar opinions of their experiences in the newborn nursery and the inpatient portion of the clerkship, but the CPP students were much more positive about their learning experience in the clinic (P =. 001). The CPP students reported more involvement in the patient's overall care (P<.001) and in other aspects of clinic operation (P<.001). The UNMC and CPP students had similar opinions of curriculum content, reading material, and didactic instruction. No group differences were found regarding interest in pediatrics as a career. Most importantly, no group differences were found in performance on any portion of the end-of-course examinations. Conclusions: Community- based education at the third-year clerkship level can be accomplished without a significant effect on student examination performance if students and faculty are aware of and adhere to a common set of goals. The end result is a much more robust experience for students who spend the clerkship in the practice of a community-based pediatrician.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032849954&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032849954&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archpedi.153.9.989

DO - 10.1001/archpedi.153.9.989

M3 - Article

VL - 153

SP - 989

EP - 994

JO - JAMA Pediatrics

JF - JAMA Pediatrics

SN - 2168-6203

IS - 9

ER -