Patients, privacy and trust: Patients' willingness to allow researchers to access their medical records

Laura J. Damschroder, Joy L. Pritts, Michael A. Neblo, Rosemarie J. Kalarickal, John W. Creswell, Rodney A. Hayward

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

88 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The federal Privacy Rule, implemented in the United States in 2003, as part of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), created new restrictions on the release of medical information for research. Many believe that its restrictions have fallen disproportionately on researchers prompting some to call for changes to the Rule. Here we ask what patients think about researchers' access to medical records, and what influences these opinions. A sample of 217 patients from 4 Veteran Affairs (VA) facilities deliberated in small groups at each location with the opportunity to question experts and inform themselves about privacy issues related to medical records research. After extensive deliberation, these patients were united in their inclination to share their medical records for research. Yet they were also united in their recommendations to institute procedures that would give them more control over whether and how their medical records are used for research. We integrated qualitative and quantitative results to derive a better understanding of this apparent paradox. Our findings can best be presented as answers to questions related to five dimensions of trust: (1)Are medical records kept confidential?(2)Does the research being conducted demonstrate high priority on patient welfare?(3)Are researchers held accountable and responsible for protecting privacy?(4)Are systems to protect medical records sufficiently secure?(5)Do researchers fully disclose the research being conducted and how medical records are used to conduct that research? Patients' trust in VA researchers was the most powerful determinant of the kind of control they want over their medical records. More specifically, those who had lower trust in VA researchers were more likely to recommend a more stringent process for obtaining individual consent. Insights on the critical role of trust suggest actions that researchers and others can take to more fully engage patients in research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)223-235
Number of pages13
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume64
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Fingerprint

Privacy
Medical Records
privacy
Research Personnel
Veterans
Biomedical Research
Research
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
health insurance
Medical records
Willingness
accountability
deliberation
small group
welfare
act
expert
determinants
responsibility

Keywords

  • Deliberative democracy
  • Health insurance portability and accountability act (hipaa)
  • Health policy
  • Medical records
  • Privacy
  • Trust
  • USA

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Patients, privacy and trust : Patients' willingness to allow researchers to access their medical records. / Damschroder, Laura J.; Pritts, Joy L.; Neblo, Michael A.; Kalarickal, Rosemarie J.; Creswell, John W.; Hayward, Rodney A.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 64, No. 1, 01.01.2007, p. 223-235.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Damschroder, Laura J. ; Pritts, Joy L. ; Neblo, Michael A. ; Kalarickal, Rosemarie J. ; Creswell, John W. ; Hayward, Rodney A. / Patients, privacy and trust : Patients' willingness to allow researchers to access their medical records. In: Social Science and Medicine. 2007 ; Vol. 64, No. 1. pp. 223-235.
@article{c86ea9138b604717b84f5fb002a8eacd,
title = "Patients, privacy and trust: Patients' willingness to allow researchers to access their medical records",
abstract = "The federal Privacy Rule, implemented in the United States in 2003, as part of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), created new restrictions on the release of medical information for research. Many believe that its restrictions have fallen disproportionately on researchers prompting some to call for changes to the Rule. Here we ask what patients think about researchers' access to medical records, and what influences these opinions. A sample of 217 patients from 4 Veteran Affairs (VA) facilities deliberated in small groups at each location with the opportunity to question experts and inform themselves about privacy issues related to medical records research. After extensive deliberation, these patients were united in their inclination to share their medical records for research. Yet they were also united in their recommendations to institute procedures that would give them more control over whether and how their medical records are used for research. We integrated qualitative and quantitative results to derive a better understanding of this apparent paradox. Our findings can best be presented as answers to questions related to five dimensions of trust: (1)Are medical records kept confidential?(2)Does the research being conducted demonstrate high priority on patient welfare?(3)Are researchers held accountable and responsible for protecting privacy?(4)Are systems to protect medical records sufficiently secure?(5)Do researchers fully disclose the research being conducted and how medical records are used to conduct that research? Patients' trust in VA researchers was the most powerful determinant of the kind of control they want over their medical records. More specifically, those who had lower trust in VA researchers were more likely to recommend a more stringent process for obtaining individual consent. Insights on the critical role of trust suggest actions that researchers and others can take to more fully engage patients in research.",
keywords = "Deliberative democracy, Health insurance portability and accountability act (hipaa), Health policy, Medical records, Privacy, Trust, USA",
author = "Damschroder, {Laura J.} and Pritts, {Joy L.} and Neblo, {Michael A.} and Kalarickal, {Rosemarie J.} and Creswell, {John W.} and Hayward, {Rodney A.}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.045",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "223--235",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patients, privacy and trust

T2 - Patients' willingness to allow researchers to access their medical records

AU - Damschroder, Laura J.

AU - Pritts, Joy L.

AU - Neblo, Michael A.

AU - Kalarickal, Rosemarie J.

AU - Creswell, John W.

AU - Hayward, Rodney A.

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - The federal Privacy Rule, implemented in the United States in 2003, as part of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), created new restrictions on the release of medical information for research. Many believe that its restrictions have fallen disproportionately on researchers prompting some to call for changes to the Rule. Here we ask what patients think about researchers' access to medical records, and what influences these opinions. A sample of 217 patients from 4 Veteran Affairs (VA) facilities deliberated in small groups at each location with the opportunity to question experts and inform themselves about privacy issues related to medical records research. After extensive deliberation, these patients were united in their inclination to share their medical records for research. Yet they were also united in their recommendations to institute procedures that would give them more control over whether and how their medical records are used for research. We integrated qualitative and quantitative results to derive a better understanding of this apparent paradox. Our findings can best be presented as answers to questions related to five dimensions of trust: (1)Are medical records kept confidential?(2)Does the research being conducted demonstrate high priority on patient welfare?(3)Are researchers held accountable and responsible for protecting privacy?(4)Are systems to protect medical records sufficiently secure?(5)Do researchers fully disclose the research being conducted and how medical records are used to conduct that research? Patients' trust in VA researchers was the most powerful determinant of the kind of control they want over their medical records. More specifically, those who had lower trust in VA researchers were more likely to recommend a more stringent process for obtaining individual consent. Insights on the critical role of trust suggest actions that researchers and others can take to more fully engage patients in research.

AB - The federal Privacy Rule, implemented in the United States in 2003, as part of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), created new restrictions on the release of medical information for research. Many believe that its restrictions have fallen disproportionately on researchers prompting some to call for changes to the Rule. Here we ask what patients think about researchers' access to medical records, and what influences these opinions. A sample of 217 patients from 4 Veteran Affairs (VA) facilities deliberated in small groups at each location with the opportunity to question experts and inform themselves about privacy issues related to medical records research. After extensive deliberation, these patients were united in their inclination to share their medical records for research. Yet they were also united in their recommendations to institute procedures that would give them more control over whether and how their medical records are used for research. We integrated qualitative and quantitative results to derive a better understanding of this apparent paradox. Our findings can best be presented as answers to questions related to five dimensions of trust: (1)Are medical records kept confidential?(2)Does the research being conducted demonstrate high priority on patient welfare?(3)Are researchers held accountable and responsible for protecting privacy?(4)Are systems to protect medical records sufficiently secure?(5)Do researchers fully disclose the research being conducted and how medical records are used to conduct that research? Patients' trust in VA researchers was the most powerful determinant of the kind of control they want over their medical records. More specifically, those who had lower trust in VA researchers were more likely to recommend a more stringent process for obtaining individual consent. Insights on the critical role of trust suggest actions that researchers and others can take to more fully engage patients in research.

KW - Deliberative democracy

KW - Health insurance portability and accountability act (hipaa)

KW - Health policy

KW - Medical records

KW - Privacy

KW - Trust

KW - USA

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751003263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33751003263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.045

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.045

M3 - Article

C2 - 17045717

AN - SCOPUS:33751003263

VL - 64

SP - 223

EP - 235

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - 1

ER -