Patient-centered care and communication in primary care practice: What is involved?

Virginia Aita, Helen McIlvain, Elisabeth L Backer, Kristine McVea, Benjamin Crabtree

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This secondary, qualitative analysis examined physician-patient interaction and patient-centered care in a random sample of encounters of 44 physicians in 18 family practices. Methods: Fieldworkers were trained in qualitative and quantitative data collection strategies including participatory observation, narrative description, interviewing techniques and note-taking regarding practice observations, patient encounters and community assessment. Fieldworkers spent 4-8 weeks in each practice. Data included descriptions of practices, personnel, office systems, patient encounters, chart audits and physician, practice personnel and community informant interviews. Data analysis included comparison of results with Stewart et al. patient-centered model. Results: Results support and extend the work of Stewart et al. The content and expression of clinical discourse in the exam room springs from complex sources, including physician and patient characteristics, practice and community cultures, and related medical care expectations. Discussion: Patient-centered values often conflict with other competing values. Ideas drawn from complexity science helped make sense of how "attractors" identified in findings influenced outcomes of patient-centered care and communication. Conclusion: Physician, patient, practice and community characteristics, values and expectations impact the effectiveness of patient-centered care and communication. Implications: Medical students, residents and practicing physicians need opportunities to evaluate competing values affecting the delivery of patient care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)296-304
Number of pages9
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume58
Issue number3 SPEC. ISS.
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2005

Fingerprint

Patient-Centered Care
Primary Health Care
Communication
Physicians
Health Personnel
Family Practice
Medical Students
Patient Care
Observation
Interviews

Keywords

  • Community culture
  • Complexity science
  • Patient characteristics
  • Patient-centered communication
  • Physician style
  • Practice culture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Patient-centered care and communication in primary care practice : What is involved? / Aita, Virginia; McIlvain, Helen; Backer, Elisabeth L; McVea, Kristine; Crabtree, Benjamin.

In: Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 58, No. 3 SPEC. ISS., 09.2005, p. 296-304.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Aita, Virginia ; McIlvain, Helen ; Backer, Elisabeth L ; McVea, Kristine ; Crabtree, Benjamin. / Patient-centered care and communication in primary care practice : What is involved?. In: Patient Education and Counseling. 2005 ; Vol. 58, No. 3 SPEC. ISS. pp. 296-304.
@article{70cca8005298475db28fc7940d22d445,
title = "Patient-centered care and communication in primary care practice: What is involved?",
abstract = "Objective: This secondary, qualitative analysis examined physician-patient interaction and patient-centered care in a random sample of encounters of 44 physicians in 18 family practices. Methods: Fieldworkers were trained in qualitative and quantitative data collection strategies including participatory observation, narrative description, interviewing techniques and note-taking regarding practice observations, patient encounters and community assessment. Fieldworkers spent 4-8 weeks in each practice. Data included descriptions of practices, personnel, office systems, patient encounters, chart audits and physician, practice personnel and community informant interviews. Data analysis included comparison of results with Stewart et al. patient-centered model. Results: Results support and extend the work of Stewart et al. The content and expression of clinical discourse in the exam room springs from complex sources, including physician and patient characteristics, practice and community cultures, and related medical care expectations. Discussion: Patient-centered values often conflict with other competing values. Ideas drawn from complexity science helped make sense of how {"}attractors{"} identified in findings influenced outcomes of patient-centered care and communication. Conclusion: Physician, patient, practice and community characteristics, values and expectations impact the effectiveness of patient-centered care and communication. Implications: Medical students, residents and practicing physicians need opportunities to evaluate competing values affecting the delivery of patient care.",
keywords = "Community culture, Complexity science, Patient characteristics, Patient-centered communication, Physician style, Practice culture",
author = "Virginia Aita and Helen McIlvain and Backer, {Elisabeth L} and Kristine McVea and Benjamin Crabtree",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2004.12.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "296--304",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "3 SPEC. ISS.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient-centered care and communication in primary care practice

T2 - What is involved?

AU - Aita, Virginia

AU - McIlvain, Helen

AU - Backer, Elisabeth L

AU - McVea, Kristine

AU - Crabtree, Benjamin

PY - 2005/9

Y1 - 2005/9

N2 - Objective: This secondary, qualitative analysis examined physician-patient interaction and patient-centered care in a random sample of encounters of 44 physicians in 18 family practices. Methods: Fieldworkers were trained in qualitative and quantitative data collection strategies including participatory observation, narrative description, interviewing techniques and note-taking regarding practice observations, patient encounters and community assessment. Fieldworkers spent 4-8 weeks in each practice. Data included descriptions of practices, personnel, office systems, patient encounters, chart audits and physician, practice personnel and community informant interviews. Data analysis included comparison of results with Stewart et al. patient-centered model. Results: Results support and extend the work of Stewart et al. The content and expression of clinical discourse in the exam room springs from complex sources, including physician and patient characteristics, practice and community cultures, and related medical care expectations. Discussion: Patient-centered values often conflict with other competing values. Ideas drawn from complexity science helped make sense of how "attractors" identified in findings influenced outcomes of patient-centered care and communication. Conclusion: Physician, patient, practice and community characteristics, values and expectations impact the effectiveness of patient-centered care and communication. Implications: Medical students, residents and practicing physicians need opportunities to evaluate competing values affecting the delivery of patient care.

AB - Objective: This secondary, qualitative analysis examined physician-patient interaction and patient-centered care in a random sample of encounters of 44 physicians in 18 family practices. Methods: Fieldworkers were trained in qualitative and quantitative data collection strategies including participatory observation, narrative description, interviewing techniques and note-taking regarding practice observations, patient encounters and community assessment. Fieldworkers spent 4-8 weeks in each practice. Data included descriptions of practices, personnel, office systems, patient encounters, chart audits and physician, practice personnel and community informant interviews. Data analysis included comparison of results with Stewart et al. patient-centered model. Results: Results support and extend the work of Stewart et al. The content and expression of clinical discourse in the exam room springs from complex sources, including physician and patient characteristics, practice and community cultures, and related medical care expectations. Discussion: Patient-centered values often conflict with other competing values. Ideas drawn from complexity science helped make sense of how "attractors" identified in findings influenced outcomes of patient-centered care and communication. Conclusion: Physician, patient, practice and community characteristics, values and expectations impact the effectiveness of patient-centered care and communication. Implications: Medical students, residents and practicing physicians need opportunities to evaluate competing values affecting the delivery of patient care.

KW - Community culture

KW - Complexity science

KW - Patient characteristics

KW - Patient-centered communication

KW - Physician style

KW - Practice culture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23944499852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23944499852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2004.12.008

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2004.12.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 16122641

AN - SCOPUS:23944499852

VL - 58

SP - 296

EP - 304

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

IS - 3 SPEC. ISS.

ER -