Partner support and maternal depression in the context of the iowa floods

Rebecca L. Brock, Michael W. O'Hara, Kimberly J. Hart, Jennifer E. McCabe, J. Austin Williamson, David P. Laplante, Chunbo Yu, Suzanne King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A systematic investigation of the role of prenatal partner support in perinatal maternal depression was conducted. Separate facets of partner support were examined (i.e., received support and support adequacy) and a multidimensional model of support was applied to investigate the effects of distinct types of support (i.e., informational, physical comfort, emotional/esteem, and tangible support). Both main and stress-buffering models of partner support were tested in the context of prenatal maternal stress resulting from exposure to a natural disaster. Questionnaire data were analyzed from 145 partnered women using growth curve analytic techniques. Results indicate that received support interacts with maternal flood stress during pregnancy to weaken the association between stress and trajectories of maternal depression from pregnancy to 30 months postpartum. Support adequacy did not interact with stress, but was associated with levels of depressive symptoms controlling for maternal stress and received support. Results demonstrate the distinct roles of various facets and types of support for a more refined explanatory model of prenatal partner support and perinatal maternal depression. Results inform both main effect and stress buffering models of partner support as they apply to the etiology of perinatal maternal depression, and highlight the importance of promoting partner support during pregnancy that matches support preferences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)832-843
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Family Psychology
Volume28
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

Mothers
Depression
Pregnancy
Disasters
Postpartum Period
Growth

Keywords

  • Couples
  • Natural disaster
  • Perinatal maternal depression
  • Prenatal maternal stress
  • Prenatal partner support

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Brock, R. L., O'Hara, M. W., Hart, K. J., McCabe, J. E., Williamson, J. A., Laplante, D. P., ... King, S. (2014). Partner support and maternal depression in the context of the iowa floods. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(6), 832-843. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000027

Partner support and maternal depression in the context of the iowa floods. / Brock, Rebecca L.; O'Hara, Michael W.; Hart, Kimberly J.; McCabe, Jennifer E.; Williamson, J. Austin; Laplante, David P.; Yu, Chunbo; King, Suzanne.

In: Journal of Family Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 6, 01.12.2014, p. 832-843.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brock, RL, O'Hara, MW, Hart, KJ, McCabe, JE, Williamson, JA, Laplante, DP, Yu, C & King, S 2014, 'Partner support and maternal depression in the context of the iowa floods', Journal of Family Psychology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 832-843. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000027
Brock RL, O'Hara MW, Hart KJ, McCabe JE, Williamson JA, Laplante DP et al. Partner support and maternal depression in the context of the iowa floods. Journal of Family Psychology. 2014 Dec 1;28(6):832-843. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000027
Brock, Rebecca L. ; O'Hara, Michael W. ; Hart, Kimberly J. ; McCabe, Jennifer E. ; Williamson, J. Austin ; Laplante, David P. ; Yu, Chunbo ; King, Suzanne. / Partner support and maternal depression in the context of the iowa floods. In: Journal of Family Psychology. 2014 ; Vol. 28, No. 6. pp. 832-843.
@article{a6a293cc78524af5b0e92e0aa4f8a20d,
title = "Partner support and maternal depression in the context of the iowa floods",
abstract = "A systematic investigation of the role of prenatal partner support in perinatal maternal depression was conducted. Separate facets of partner support were examined (i.e., received support and support adequacy) and a multidimensional model of support was applied to investigate the effects of distinct types of support (i.e., informational, physical comfort, emotional/esteem, and tangible support). Both main and stress-buffering models of partner support were tested in the context of prenatal maternal stress resulting from exposure to a natural disaster. Questionnaire data were analyzed from 145 partnered women using growth curve analytic techniques. Results indicate that received support interacts with maternal flood stress during pregnancy to weaken the association between stress and trajectories of maternal depression from pregnancy to 30 months postpartum. Support adequacy did not interact with stress, but was associated with levels of depressive symptoms controlling for maternal stress and received support. Results demonstrate the distinct roles of various facets and types of support for a more refined explanatory model of prenatal partner support and perinatal maternal depression. Results inform both main effect and stress buffering models of partner support as they apply to the etiology of perinatal maternal depression, and highlight the importance of promoting partner support during pregnancy that matches support preferences.",
keywords = "Couples, Natural disaster, Perinatal maternal depression, Prenatal maternal stress, Prenatal partner support",
author = "Brock, {Rebecca L.} and O'Hara, {Michael W.} and Hart, {Kimberly J.} and McCabe, {Jennifer E.} and Williamson, {J. Austin} and Laplante, {David P.} and Chunbo Yu and Suzanne King",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/fam0000027",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "832--843",
journal = "Journal of Family Psychology",
issn = "0893-3200",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Partner support and maternal depression in the context of the iowa floods

AU - Brock, Rebecca L.

AU - O'Hara, Michael W.

AU - Hart, Kimberly J.

AU - McCabe, Jennifer E.

AU - Williamson, J. Austin

AU - Laplante, David P.

AU - Yu, Chunbo

AU - King, Suzanne

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - A systematic investigation of the role of prenatal partner support in perinatal maternal depression was conducted. Separate facets of partner support were examined (i.e., received support and support adequacy) and a multidimensional model of support was applied to investigate the effects of distinct types of support (i.e., informational, physical comfort, emotional/esteem, and tangible support). Both main and stress-buffering models of partner support were tested in the context of prenatal maternal stress resulting from exposure to a natural disaster. Questionnaire data were analyzed from 145 partnered women using growth curve analytic techniques. Results indicate that received support interacts with maternal flood stress during pregnancy to weaken the association between stress and trajectories of maternal depression from pregnancy to 30 months postpartum. Support adequacy did not interact with stress, but was associated with levels of depressive symptoms controlling for maternal stress and received support. Results demonstrate the distinct roles of various facets and types of support for a more refined explanatory model of prenatal partner support and perinatal maternal depression. Results inform both main effect and stress buffering models of partner support as they apply to the etiology of perinatal maternal depression, and highlight the importance of promoting partner support during pregnancy that matches support preferences.

AB - A systematic investigation of the role of prenatal partner support in perinatal maternal depression was conducted. Separate facets of partner support were examined (i.e., received support and support adequacy) and a multidimensional model of support was applied to investigate the effects of distinct types of support (i.e., informational, physical comfort, emotional/esteem, and tangible support). Both main and stress-buffering models of partner support were tested in the context of prenatal maternal stress resulting from exposure to a natural disaster. Questionnaire data were analyzed from 145 partnered women using growth curve analytic techniques. Results indicate that received support interacts with maternal flood stress during pregnancy to weaken the association between stress and trajectories of maternal depression from pregnancy to 30 months postpartum. Support adequacy did not interact with stress, but was associated with levels of depressive symptoms controlling for maternal stress and received support. Results demonstrate the distinct roles of various facets and types of support for a more refined explanatory model of prenatal partner support and perinatal maternal depression. Results inform both main effect and stress buffering models of partner support as they apply to the etiology of perinatal maternal depression, and highlight the importance of promoting partner support during pregnancy that matches support preferences.

KW - Couples

KW - Natural disaster

KW - Perinatal maternal depression

KW - Prenatal maternal stress

KW - Prenatal partner support

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925602593&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925602593&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/fam0000027

DO - 10.1037/fam0000027

M3 - Article

C2 - 25243576

AN - SCOPUS:84925602593

VL - 28

SP - 832

EP - 843

JO - Journal of Family Psychology

JF - Journal of Family Psychology

SN - 0893-3200

IS - 6

ER -