Partner congruence on fertility intentions and values: Implications for birth outcomes

Karina M. Shreffler, Stacy Tiemeyer, Julia McQuillan, Arthur L. Greil, Tiffany Spierling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In heterosexual couples, both partners’ intentions to have a baby (or not) are associated with the likelihood of a subsequent birth, yet most studies only measure women’s intentions. Therefore, little is known about the potential association of couple agreement or disagreement on intentions or on such values as importance of parenthood, career, and leisure and the implications for childbearing. The goal of this article is to assess whether couple-level agreement or disagreement in fertility intentions and values are associated with the likelihood of a subsequent birth. Guided by the Theory of Conjunctural Action, we use couple data from two waves of the U.S. National Survey of Fertility Barriers for our analysis. Based on logistic regression analysis, we find that if either partner intends a child, the odds of having a baby within 3 years are higher than if neither partner intends and that the odds are substantially higher when both partners intend a child. Couples in whom both partners and couples in whom only the woman has a high value on career success are less likely to have a baby. Our findings suggest that agreement on fertility intentions is associated with considerably higher birth probability and that values about life domains matter as well. Couple disagreement on intentions and values are related in different ways to birth outcomes depending on which partner holds which value as important. Using data from both partners allows us to examine the patterns of couple agreement, values, and gendered influences related to birth outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2307-2322
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Social and Personal Relationships
Volume36
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2019

Fingerprint

Regression analysis
Fertility
Logistics
fertility
Parturition
baby
Values
career
parenthood
Value of Life
Leisure Activities
Heterosexuality
regression analysis
logistics
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • Couples
  • fertility intentions
  • gender
  • pregnancy
  • values

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Communication
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Partner congruence on fertility intentions and values : Implications for birth outcomes. / Shreffler, Karina M.; Tiemeyer, Stacy; McQuillan, Julia; Greil, Arthur L.; Spierling, Tiffany.

In: Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 36, No. 8, 01.08.2019, p. 2307-2322.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shreffler, Karina M. ; Tiemeyer, Stacy ; McQuillan, Julia ; Greil, Arthur L. ; Spierling, Tiffany. / Partner congruence on fertility intentions and values : Implications for birth outcomes. In: Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2019 ; Vol. 36, No. 8. pp. 2307-2322.
@article{b4cc0f0a1291437dbd1b330aed684735,
title = "Partner congruence on fertility intentions and values: Implications for birth outcomes",
abstract = "In heterosexual couples, both partners’ intentions to have a baby (or not) are associated with the likelihood of a subsequent birth, yet most studies only measure women’s intentions. Therefore, little is known about the potential association of couple agreement or disagreement on intentions or on such values as importance of parenthood, career, and leisure and the implications for childbearing. The goal of this article is to assess whether couple-level agreement or disagreement in fertility intentions and values are associated with the likelihood of a subsequent birth. Guided by the Theory of Conjunctural Action, we use couple data from two waves of the U.S. National Survey of Fertility Barriers for our analysis. Based on logistic regression analysis, we find that if either partner intends a child, the odds of having a baby within 3 years are higher than if neither partner intends and that the odds are substantially higher when both partners intend a child. Couples in whom both partners and couples in whom only the woman has a high value on career success are less likely to have a baby. Our findings suggest that agreement on fertility intentions is associated with considerably higher birth probability and that values about life domains matter as well. Couple disagreement on intentions and values are related in different ways to birth outcomes depending on which partner holds which value as important. Using data from both partners allows us to examine the patterns of couple agreement, values, and gendered influences related to birth outcomes.",
keywords = "Couples, fertility intentions, gender, pregnancy, values",
author = "Shreffler, {Karina M.} and Stacy Tiemeyer and Julia McQuillan and Greil, {Arthur L.} and Tiffany Spierling",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0265407518787232",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "2307--2322",
journal = "Journal of Social and Personal Relationships",
issn = "0265-4075",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Partner congruence on fertility intentions and values

T2 - Implications for birth outcomes

AU - Shreffler, Karina M.

AU - Tiemeyer, Stacy

AU - McQuillan, Julia

AU - Greil, Arthur L.

AU - Spierling, Tiffany

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - In heterosexual couples, both partners’ intentions to have a baby (or not) are associated with the likelihood of a subsequent birth, yet most studies only measure women’s intentions. Therefore, little is known about the potential association of couple agreement or disagreement on intentions or on such values as importance of parenthood, career, and leisure and the implications for childbearing. The goal of this article is to assess whether couple-level agreement or disagreement in fertility intentions and values are associated with the likelihood of a subsequent birth. Guided by the Theory of Conjunctural Action, we use couple data from two waves of the U.S. National Survey of Fertility Barriers for our analysis. Based on logistic regression analysis, we find that if either partner intends a child, the odds of having a baby within 3 years are higher than if neither partner intends and that the odds are substantially higher when both partners intend a child. Couples in whom both partners and couples in whom only the woman has a high value on career success are less likely to have a baby. Our findings suggest that agreement on fertility intentions is associated with considerably higher birth probability and that values about life domains matter as well. Couple disagreement on intentions and values are related in different ways to birth outcomes depending on which partner holds which value as important. Using data from both partners allows us to examine the patterns of couple agreement, values, and gendered influences related to birth outcomes.

AB - In heterosexual couples, both partners’ intentions to have a baby (or not) are associated with the likelihood of a subsequent birth, yet most studies only measure women’s intentions. Therefore, little is known about the potential association of couple agreement or disagreement on intentions or on such values as importance of parenthood, career, and leisure and the implications for childbearing. The goal of this article is to assess whether couple-level agreement or disagreement in fertility intentions and values are associated with the likelihood of a subsequent birth. Guided by the Theory of Conjunctural Action, we use couple data from two waves of the U.S. National Survey of Fertility Barriers for our analysis. Based on logistic regression analysis, we find that if either partner intends a child, the odds of having a baby within 3 years are higher than if neither partner intends and that the odds are substantially higher when both partners intend a child. Couples in whom both partners and couples in whom only the woman has a high value on career success are less likely to have a baby. Our findings suggest that agreement on fertility intentions is associated with considerably higher birth probability and that values about life domains matter as well. Couple disagreement on intentions and values are related in different ways to birth outcomes depending on which partner holds which value as important. Using data from both partners allows us to examine the patterns of couple agreement, values, and gendered influences related to birth outcomes.

KW - Couples

KW - fertility intentions

KW - gender

KW - pregnancy

KW - values

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050123128&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050123128&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0265407518787232

DO - 10.1177/0265407518787232

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85050123128

VL - 36

SP - 2307

EP - 2322

JO - Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

JF - Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

SN - 0265-4075

IS - 8

ER -