Parenthood and psychological well-being in Finland: Does public policy make a difference?

J. Savolainen, E. Lahelma, K. Silventionen, A. H. Gauthier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research based on American data indicates that the presence of children in the family tends to have a negative effect on the mental well being of adults. According to McLanahan and Adams (1989 and 1989), this relationship is explained by the temporal and monetary constraints associated with contemporary parenting. In order to alleviate the problem, they advocate public policy solutions such as child allowance and state-subsidized childcare. To evaluate the salience of such programs, we examine the relationship between parenthood and psychological well-being in Finland, a country that supplies the kind of support systems that McLanahan and Adams have in mind, yet where other conditions related to parental stress are very similar to the U.S. The results from our research indicate that the children tend to have no effect on the psychological well being of Finnish women and a positive effect on Finnish men. This pattern of findings supports the "weak" version of the hypothesis derived from the policy conjecture by McLanahan and Adams.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)61-74+ii+vi+vii+x
JournalJournal of Comparative Family Studies
Volume32
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

parenthood
Finland
Public Policy
public policy
well-being
Psychology
Parenting
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Anthropology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Savolainen, J., Lahelma, E., Silventionen, K., & Gauthier, A. H. (2001). Parenthood and psychological well-being in Finland: Does public policy make a difference? Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 32(1), 61-74+ii+vi+vii+x.

Parenthood and psychological well-being in Finland : Does public policy make a difference? / Savolainen, J.; Lahelma, E.; Silventionen, K.; Gauthier, A. H.

In: Journal of Comparative Family Studies, Vol. 32, No. 1, 01.01.2001, p. 61-74+ii+vi+vii+x.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Savolainen, J, Lahelma, E, Silventionen, K & Gauthier, AH 2001, 'Parenthood and psychological well-being in Finland: Does public policy make a difference?', Journal of Comparative Family Studies, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 61-74+ii+vi+vii+x.
Savolainen J, Lahelma E, Silventionen K, Gauthier AH. Parenthood and psychological well-being in Finland: Does public policy make a difference? Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 2001 Jan 1;32(1):61-74+ii+vi+vii+x.
Savolainen, J. ; Lahelma, E. ; Silventionen, K. ; Gauthier, A. H. / Parenthood and psychological well-being in Finland : Does public policy make a difference?. In: Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 2001 ; Vol. 32, No. 1. pp. 61-74+ii+vi+vii+x.
@article{4ce8968cf55d4bcd92ac5d8a84e22416,
title = "Parenthood and psychological well-being in Finland: Does public policy make a difference?",
abstract = "Research based on American data indicates that the presence of children in the family tends to have a negative effect on the mental well being of adults. According to McLanahan and Adams (1989 and 1989), this relationship is explained by the temporal and monetary constraints associated with contemporary parenting. In order to alleviate the problem, they advocate public policy solutions such as child allowance and state-subsidized childcare. To evaluate the salience of such programs, we examine the relationship between parenthood and psychological well-being in Finland, a country that supplies the kind of support systems that McLanahan and Adams have in mind, yet where other conditions related to parental stress are very similar to the U.S. The results from our research indicate that the children tend to have no effect on the psychological well being of Finnish women and a positive effect on Finnish men. This pattern of findings supports the {"}weak{"} version of the hypothesis derived from the policy conjecture by McLanahan and Adams.",
author = "J. Savolainen and E. Lahelma and K. Silventionen and Gauthier, {A. H.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "61--74+ii+vi+vii+x",
journal = "Journal of Comparative Family Studies",
issn = "0047-2328",
publisher = "University of Calgary Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Parenthood and psychological well-being in Finland

T2 - Does public policy make a difference?

AU - Savolainen, J.

AU - Lahelma, E.

AU - Silventionen, K.

AU - Gauthier, A. H.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Research based on American data indicates that the presence of children in the family tends to have a negative effect on the mental well being of adults. According to McLanahan and Adams (1989 and 1989), this relationship is explained by the temporal and monetary constraints associated with contemporary parenting. In order to alleviate the problem, they advocate public policy solutions such as child allowance and state-subsidized childcare. To evaluate the salience of such programs, we examine the relationship between parenthood and psychological well-being in Finland, a country that supplies the kind of support systems that McLanahan and Adams have in mind, yet where other conditions related to parental stress are very similar to the U.S. The results from our research indicate that the children tend to have no effect on the psychological well being of Finnish women and a positive effect on Finnish men. This pattern of findings supports the "weak" version of the hypothesis derived from the policy conjecture by McLanahan and Adams.

AB - Research based on American data indicates that the presence of children in the family tends to have a negative effect on the mental well being of adults. According to McLanahan and Adams (1989 and 1989), this relationship is explained by the temporal and monetary constraints associated with contemporary parenting. In order to alleviate the problem, they advocate public policy solutions such as child allowance and state-subsidized childcare. To evaluate the salience of such programs, we examine the relationship between parenthood and psychological well-being in Finland, a country that supplies the kind of support systems that McLanahan and Adams have in mind, yet where other conditions related to parental stress are very similar to the U.S. The results from our research indicate that the children tend to have no effect on the psychological well being of Finnish women and a positive effect on Finnish men. This pattern of findings supports the "weak" version of the hypothesis derived from the policy conjecture by McLanahan and Adams.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034970933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034970933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034970933

VL - 32

SP - 61-74+ii+vi+vii+x

JO - Journal of Comparative Family Studies

JF - Journal of Comparative Family Studies

SN - 0047-2328

IS - 1

ER -