Options in managing the patient with high defibrillation thresholds

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The desired defibrillation threshold (DFT) obtained during intraoperative testing of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) should be 10 J lower than the maximal energy delivered by the ICD generator. Of the 206 patients undergoing ICD implantation since December 1986, 8 (3.9%) have had initial DFTs with less than the 10-J safety margin using the standard large patch-large patch configuration. Patches were implanted by left thoracotomy in 6 and sternotomy in 1, and 1 had implantation of a transvenous defibrillation lead and subcutaneous patch. Of note, 6 (75%) of the 8 patients with high DFTs had prior open heart operations, half were on a regimen of long-term amiodarone therapy, and the mean left ventricular mass index was quite large but not significantly greater than that of patients with low DFTs. Multiple techniques were tried to improve the DFTs in this group. Satisfactory DFTs were eventually obtained in 7 (88%); the threshold was lowered from a mean of 41.4 ± 3.8 J to 26.9 ± 8.8 J (p = 0.002). The most effective techniques were addition of a superior vena cava lead attached by a Y connector to one of the large patch leads in some patients and conversion to a biphasic-waveform generator in 2 others. Adding a third epicardial lead did not lower the DFTs. There were no major postoperative complications or deaths attributable to these supplemental procedures. Using these techniques, satisfactory DFTs were obtained in almost all patients with an ICD. Consideration should be given to insertion of a superior vena cava lead at the initial ICD implantation should an unacceptably high DFT be obtained with standard patch configurations. Biphasic-waveform generators and other newer devices may reduce the number of patients who require multiple leads for reliable DFTs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1184-1192
Number of pages9
JournalThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Volume57
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1994

Fingerprint

Implantable Defibrillators
Superior Vena Cava
Sternotomy
Amiodarone
Thoracotomy
Safety
Equipment and Supplies
Lead

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Options in managing the patient with high defibrillation thresholds. / Robinson, Lary A.; Windle, John Robert; Easley Jr, Arthur R.

In: The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 57, No. 5, 05.1994, p. 1184-1192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{631f8c99468a4737a2ae5341e0811e05,
title = "Options in managing the patient with high defibrillation thresholds",
abstract = "The desired defibrillation threshold (DFT) obtained during intraoperative testing of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) should be 10 J lower than the maximal energy delivered by the ICD generator. Of the 206 patients undergoing ICD implantation since December 1986, 8 (3.9{\%}) have had initial DFTs with less than the 10-J safety margin using the standard large patch-large patch configuration. Patches were implanted by left thoracotomy in 6 and sternotomy in 1, and 1 had implantation of a transvenous defibrillation lead and subcutaneous patch. Of note, 6 (75{\%}) of the 8 patients with high DFTs had prior open heart operations, half were on a regimen of long-term amiodarone therapy, and the mean left ventricular mass index was quite large but not significantly greater than that of patients with low DFTs. Multiple techniques were tried to improve the DFTs in this group. Satisfactory DFTs were eventually obtained in 7 (88{\%}); the threshold was lowered from a mean of 41.4 ± 3.8 J to 26.9 ± 8.8 J (p = 0.002). The most effective techniques were addition of a superior vena cava lead attached by a Y connector to one of the large patch leads in some patients and conversion to a biphasic-waveform generator in 2 others. Adding a third epicardial lead did not lower the DFTs. There were no major postoperative complications or deaths attributable to these supplemental procedures. Using these techniques, satisfactory DFTs were obtained in almost all patients with an ICD. Consideration should be given to insertion of a superior vena cava lead at the initial ICD implantation should an unacceptably high DFT be obtained with standard patch configurations. Biphasic-waveform generators and other newer devices may reduce the number of patients who require multiple leads for reliable DFTs.",
author = "Robinson, {Lary A.} and Windle, {John Robert} and {Easley Jr}, {Arthur R}",
year = "1994",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/0003-4975(94)91354-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "1184--1192",
journal = "Annals of Thoracic Surgery",
issn = "0003-4975",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Options in managing the patient with high defibrillation thresholds

AU - Robinson, Lary A.

AU - Windle, John Robert

AU - Easley Jr, Arthur R

PY - 1994/5

Y1 - 1994/5

N2 - The desired defibrillation threshold (DFT) obtained during intraoperative testing of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) should be 10 J lower than the maximal energy delivered by the ICD generator. Of the 206 patients undergoing ICD implantation since December 1986, 8 (3.9%) have had initial DFTs with less than the 10-J safety margin using the standard large patch-large patch configuration. Patches were implanted by left thoracotomy in 6 and sternotomy in 1, and 1 had implantation of a transvenous defibrillation lead and subcutaneous patch. Of note, 6 (75%) of the 8 patients with high DFTs had prior open heart operations, half were on a regimen of long-term amiodarone therapy, and the mean left ventricular mass index was quite large but not significantly greater than that of patients with low DFTs. Multiple techniques were tried to improve the DFTs in this group. Satisfactory DFTs were eventually obtained in 7 (88%); the threshold was lowered from a mean of 41.4 ± 3.8 J to 26.9 ± 8.8 J (p = 0.002). The most effective techniques were addition of a superior vena cava lead attached by a Y connector to one of the large patch leads in some patients and conversion to a biphasic-waveform generator in 2 others. Adding a third epicardial lead did not lower the DFTs. There were no major postoperative complications or deaths attributable to these supplemental procedures. Using these techniques, satisfactory DFTs were obtained in almost all patients with an ICD. Consideration should be given to insertion of a superior vena cava lead at the initial ICD implantation should an unacceptably high DFT be obtained with standard patch configurations. Biphasic-waveform generators and other newer devices may reduce the number of patients who require multiple leads for reliable DFTs.

AB - The desired defibrillation threshold (DFT) obtained during intraoperative testing of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) should be 10 J lower than the maximal energy delivered by the ICD generator. Of the 206 patients undergoing ICD implantation since December 1986, 8 (3.9%) have had initial DFTs with less than the 10-J safety margin using the standard large patch-large patch configuration. Patches were implanted by left thoracotomy in 6 and sternotomy in 1, and 1 had implantation of a transvenous defibrillation lead and subcutaneous patch. Of note, 6 (75%) of the 8 patients with high DFTs had prior open heart operations, half were on a regimen of long-term amiodarone therapy, and the mean left ventricular mass index was quite large but not significantly greater than that of patients with low DFTs. Multiple techniques were tried to improve the DFTs in this group. Satisfactory DFTs were eventually obtained in 7 (88%); the threshold was lowered from a mean of 41.4 ± 3.8 J to 26.9 ± 8.8 J (p = 0.002). The most effective techniques were addition of a superior vena cava lead attached by a Y connector to one of the large patch leads in some patients and conversion to a biphasic-waveform generator in 2 others. Adding a third epicardial lead did not lower the DFTs. There were no major postoperative complications or deaths attributable to these supplemental procedures. Using these techniques, satisfactory DFTs were obtained in almost all patients with an ICD. Consideration should be given to insertion of a superior vena cava lead at the initial ICD implantation should an unacceptably high DFT be obtained with standard patch configurations. Biphasic-waveform generators and other newer devices may reduce the number of patients who require multiple leads for reliable DFTs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028335975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028335975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0003-4975(94)91354-4

DO - 10.1016/0003-4975(94)91354-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 8179383

AN - SCOPUS:0028335975

VL - 57

SP - 1184

EP - 1192

JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

SN - 0003-4975

IS - 5

ER -