Optimizing Photo-Encapsulation Viability of Heart Valve Cell Types in 3D Printable Composite Hydrogels

Laura Hockaday Kang, Patrick A. Armstrong, Lauren Julia Lee, Bin Duan, Kevin Heeyong Kang, Jonathan Talbot Butcher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Photocrosslinking hydrogel technologies are attractive for the biofabrication of cardiovascular soft tissues, but 3D printing success is dependent on multiple variables. In this study we systematically test variables associated with photocrosslinking hydrogels (photoinitiator type, photoinitiator concentration, and light intensity) for their effects on encapsulated cells in an extrusion 3D printable mixture of methacrylated gelatin/poly-ethylene glycol diacrylate/alginate (MEGEL/PEGDA3350/alginate). The fabrication conditions that produced desired hydrogel mechanical properties were compared against those that optimize aortic valve or mesenchymal stem cell viability. In the 3D hydrogel culture environment and fabrication setting studied, Irgacure can increase hydrogel stiffness with a lower proportional decrease in encapsulated cell viability compared to VA086. Human adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells (HADMSC) survived increasing photoinitiator concentrations in photo-encapsulation conditions better than aortic valve interstitial cells (HAVIC) and aortic valve sinus smooth muscle cells (HASSMC). Within the range of photo-encapsulation fabrication conditions tested with MEGEL/PEGDA/alginate (0.25–1.0% w/v VA086, 0.025–0.1% w/v Irgacure 2959, and 365 nm light intensity 2–136 mW/cm2), the highest viabilities achieved were 95, 93, and 93% live for HASSMC, HAVIC, and HADMSC respectively. These results identify parameter combinations that optimize cell viability during 3D printing for multiple cell types. These results also indicate that general oxidative stress is higher in photocrosslinking conditions that induce lower cell viability. However, suppressing this increase in intracellular oxidative stress did not improve cell viability, which suggests that other stress mechanisms also contribute.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)360-377
Number of pages18
JournalAnnals of biomedical engineering
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Encapsulation
Hydrogels
Cells
Alginate
Stem cells
Composite materials
Oxidative stress
Fabrication
Muscle
Printing
Cell culture
Polyethylene glycols
Extrusion
Stiffness
Tissue
Mechanical properties

Keywords

  • Bio-ink
  • Biofabrication
  • Extrusion bioprinting
  • Mesenchymal stem cells
  • Oxidative stress
  • Photo-polymerization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

Optimizing Photo-Encapsulation Viability of Heart Valve Cell Types in 3D Printable Composite Hydrogels. / Kang, Laura Hockaday; Armstrong, Patrick A.; Lee, Lauren Julia; Duan, Bin; Kang, Kevin Heeyong; Butcher, Jonathan Talbot.

In: Annals of biomedical engineering, Vol. 45, No. 2, 01.02.2017, p. 360-377.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kang, Laura Hockaday ; Armstrong, Patrick A. ; Lee, Lauren Julia ; Duan, Bin ; Kang, Kevin Heeyong ; Butcher, Jonathan Talbot. / Optimizing Photo-Encapsulation Viability of Heart Valve Cell Types in 3D Printable Composite Hydrogels. In: Annals of biomedical engineering. 2017 ; Vol. 45, No. 2. pp. 360-377.
@article{318843a992da405ba2e5cd86c6f1b54c,
title = "Optimizing Photo-Encapsulation Viability of Heart Valve Cell Types in 3D Printable Composite Hydrogels",
abstract = "Photocrosslinking hydrogel technologies are attractive for the biofabrication of cardiovascular soft tissues, but 3D printing success is dependent on multiple variables. In this study we systematically test variables associated with photocrosslinking hydrogels (photoinitiator type, photoinitiator concentration, and light intensity) for their effects on encapsulated cells in an extrusion 3D printable mixture of methacrylated gelatin/poly-ethylene glycol diacrylate/alginate (MEGEL/PEGDA3350/alginate). The fabrication conditions that produced desired hydrogel mechanical properties were compared against those that optimize aortic valve or mesenchymal stem cell viability. In the 3D hydrogel culture environment and fabrication setting studied, Irgacure can increase hydrogel stiffness with a lower proportional decrease in encapsulated cell viability compared to VA086. Human adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells (HADMSC) survived increasing photoinitiator concentrations in photo-encapsulation conditions better than aortic valve interstitial cells (HAVIC) and aortic valve sinus smooth muscle cells (HASSMC). Within the range of photo-encapsulation fabrication conditions tested with MEGEL/PEGDA/alginate (0.25–1.0{\%} w/v VA086, 0.025–0.1{\%} w/v Irgacure 2959, and 365 nm light intensity 2–136 mW/cm2), the highest viabilities achieved were 95, 93, and 93{\%} live for HASSMC, HAVIC, and HADMSC respectively. These results identify parameter combinations that optimize cell viability during 3D printing for multiple cell types. These results also indicate that general oxidative stress is higher in photocrosslinking conditions that induce lower cell viability. However, suppressing this increase in intracellular oxidative stress did not improve cell viability, which suggests that other stress mechanisms also contribute.",
keywords = "Bio-ink, Biofabrication, Extrusion bioprinting, Mesenchymal stem cells, Oxidative stress, Photo-polymerization",
author = "Kang, {Laura Hockaday} and Armstrong, {Patrick A.} and Lee, {Lauren Julia} and Bin Duan and Kang, {Kevin Heeyong} and Butcher, {Jonathan Talbot}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10439-016-1619-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "360--377",
journal = "Annals of Biomedical Engineering",
issn = "0090-6964",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimizing Photo-Encapsulation Viability of Heart Valve Cell Types in 3D Printable Composite Hydrogels

AU - Kang, Laura Hockaday

AU - Armstrong, Patrick A.

AU - Lee, Lauren Julia

AU - Duan, Bin

AU - Kang, Kevin Heeyong

AU - Butcher, Jonathan Talbot

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Photocrosslinking hydrogel technologies are attractive for the biofabrication of cardiovascular soft tissues, but 3D printing success is dependent on multiple variables. In this study we systematically test variables associated with photocrosslinking hydrogels (photoinitiator type, photoinitiator concentration, and light intensity) for their effects on encapsulated cells in an extrusion 3D printable mixture of methacrylated gelatin/poly-ethylene glycol diacrylate/alginate (MEGEL/PEGDA3350/alginate). The fabrication conditions that produced desired hydrogel mechanical properties were compared against those that optimize aortic valve or mesenchymal stem cell viability. In the 3D hydrogel culture environment and fabrication setting studied, Irgacure can increase hydrogel stiffness with a lower proportional decrease in encapsulated cell viability compared to VA086. Human adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells (HADMSC) survived increasing photoinitiator concentrations in photo-encapsulation conditions better than aortic valve interstitial cells (HAVIC) and aortic valve sinus smooth muscle cells (HASSMC). Within the range of photo-encapsulation fabrication conditions tested with MEGEL/PEGDA/alginate (0.25–1.0% w/v VA086, 0.025–0.1% w/v Irgacure 2959, and 365 nm light intensity 2–136 mW/cm2), the highest viabilities achieved were 95, 93, and 93% live for HASSMC, HAVIC, and HADMSC respectively. These results identify parameter combinations that optimize cell viability during 3D printing for multiple cell types. These results also indicate that general oxidative stress is higher in photocrosslinking conditions that induce lower cell viability. However, suppressing this increase in intracellular oxidative stress did not improve cell viability, which suggests that other stress mechanisms also contribute.

AB - Photocrosslinking hydrogel technologies are attractive for the biofabrication of cardiovascular soft tissues, but 3D printing success is dependent on multiple variables. In this study we systematically test variables associated with photocrosslinking hydrogels (photoinitiator type, photoinitiator concentration, and light intensity) for their effects on encapsulated cells in an extrusion 3D printable mixture of methacrylated gelatin/poly-ethylene glycol diacrylate/alginate (MEGEL/PEGDA3350/alginate). The fabrication conditions that produced desired hydrogel mechanical properties were compared against those that optimize aortic valve or mesenchymal stem cell viability. In the 3D hydrogel culture environment and fabrication setting studied, Irgacure can increase hydrogel stiffness with a lower proportional decrease in encapsulated cell viability compared to VA086. Human adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells (HADMSC) survived increasing photoinitiator concentrations in photo-encapsulation conditions better than aortic valve interstitial cells (HAVIC) and aortic valve sinus smooth muscle cells (HASSMC). Within the range of photo-encapsulation fabrication conditions tested with MEGEL/PEGDA/alginate (0.25–1.0% w/v VA086, 0.025–0.1% w/v Irgacure 2959, and 365 nm light intensity 2–136 mW/cm2), the highest viabilities achieved were 95, 93, and 93% live for HASSMC, HAVIC, and HADMSC respectively. These results identify parameter combinations that optimize cell viability during 3D printing for multiple cell types. These results also indicate that general oxidative stress is higher in photocrosslinking conditions that induce lower cell viability. However, suppressing this increase in intracellular oxidative stress did not improve cell viability, which suggests that other stress mechanisms also contribute.

KW - Bio-ink

KW - Biofabrication

KW - Extrusion bioprinting

KW - Mesenchymal stem cells

KW - Oxidative stress

KW - Photo-polymerization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964308598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964308598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10439-016-1619-1

DO - 10.1007/s10439-016-1619-1

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 360

EP - 377

JO - Annals of Biomedical Engineering

JF - Annals of Biomedical Engineering

SN - 0090-6964

IS - 2

ER -