Optimal therapy for patients with biliary atresia

Portoenterostomy ("Kasai" procedures) versus primary transplantation

R. Patrick Wood, Alan Norman Langnas, Robert J. Stratta, Todd J. Pillen, Laurel Williams, Simone Lindsay, Diana Meiergerd, Byers W. Shaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As the results with liver transplantation have improved, a controversy has arisen regarding the precise role of a portoenterostomy in the treatment of infants with biliary atresia. The controversy centers around three issues: (1) the short- and long-term survival rates achieved with both procedures, (2) the influence of a portoenterostomy on a subsequent transplant, and (3) the shortage of suitable liver donors for very small infants. To address these questions, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of 48 children with biliary atresia who underwent liver transplantation and compared these results with 35 children transplanted for other liver diseases. As a group, the biliary atresia patients had significantly lower mean body weights and ages and spent a significantly longer time on the waiting list. In addition, significantly more of the biliary atresia patients had undergone prior abdominal surgery when compared with the non-biliary atresia group. There was no difference in the intraoperative variables of mean anesthesia time, mean operative time, mean anesthesia preparation time, nor the mean amount of blood transfused intraoperatively between the two groups. However, when the biliary atresia patients who had undergone a portoenterostomy with a stoma were compared with either the biliary atresia patients who did not have a stoma created as part of their portoenterostomy or the non-biliary atresia patients, significant differences were noted in mean total anesthesia time, mean operative time, and the mean amount of blood transfused intraoperatively. The survival rate of the biliary atresia patients was significantly greater than the non-biliary atresia patients. The overall incidence of reoperations was not different between the two groups but reoperations on the biliary tract were significantly more common in the non-biliary atresia patients. Finally, when the biliary atresia patients who died while awaiting transplantation were compared with those who received transplants, the former group were found to be significantly younger and have a significantly lower mean body weight than the group who received transplants. Based on our data and a review of the literature, an algorithm is presented for the management of patients with biliary atresia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)152-162
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of pediatric surgery
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1990

Fingerprint

Biliary Atresia
Transplantation
Therapeutics
Anesthesia
Operative Time
Transplants
Reoperation
Liver Transplantation
Survival Rate
Body Weight
Waiting Lists
Biliary Tract
Liver Diseases
Tissue Donors

Keywords

  • Biliary atresia
  • hepatic portoenterostomy
  • liver transplantation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Surgery

Cite this

Optimal therapy for patients with biliary atresia : Portoenterostomy ("Kasai" procedures) versus primary transplantation. / Wood, R. Patrick; Langnas, Alan Norman; Stratta, Robert J.; Pillen, Todd J.; Williams, Laurel; Lindsay, Simone; Meiergerd, Diana; Shaw, Byers W.

In: Journal of pediatric surgery, Vol. 25, No. 1, 01.01.1990, p. 152-162.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wood, R. Patrick ; Langnas, Alan Norman ; Stratta, Robert J. ; Pillen, Todd J. ; Williams, Laurel ; Lindsay, Simone ; Meiergerd, Diana ; Shaw, Byers W. / Optimal therapy for patients with biliary atresia : Portoenterostomy ("Kasai" procedures) versus primary transplantation. In: Journal of pediatric surgery. 1990 ; Vol. 25, No. 1. pp. 152-162.
@article{3d87b191d8484e6c9cb9cfc996777159,
title = "Optimal therapy for patients with biliary atresia: Portoenterostomy ({"}Kasai{"} procedures) versus primary transplantation",
abstract = "As the results with liver transplantation have improved, a controversy has arisen regarding the precise role of a portoenterostomy in the treatment of infants with biliary atresia. The controversy centers around three issues: (1) the short- and long-term survival rates achieved with both procedures, (2) the influence of a portoenterostomy on a subsequent transplant, and (3) the shortage of suitable liver donors for very small infants. To address these questions, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of 48 children with biliary atresia who underwent liver transplantation and compared these results with 35 children transplanted for other liver diseases. As a group, the biliary atresia patients had significantly lower mean body weights and ages and spent a significantly longer time on the waiting list. In addition, significantly more of the biliary atresia patients had undergone prior abdominal surgery when compared with the non-biliary atresia group. There was no difference in the intraoperative variables of mean anesthesia time, mean operative time, mean anesthesia preparation time, nor the mean amount of blood transfused intraoperatively between the two groups. However, when the biliary atresia patients who had undergone a portoenterostomy with a stoma were compared with either the biliary atresia patients who did not have a stoma created as part of their portoenterostomy or the non-biliary atresia patients, significant differences were noted in mean total anesthesia time, mean operative time, and the mean amount of blood transfused intraoperatively. The survival rate of the biliary atresia patients was significantly greater than the non-biliary atresia patients. The overall incidence of reoperations was not different between the two groups but reoperations on the biliary tract were significantly more common in the non-biliary atresia patients. Finally, when the biliary atresia patients who died while awaiting transplantation were compared with those who received transplants, the former group were found to be significantly younger and have a significantly lower mean body weight than the group who received transplants. Based on our data and a review of the literature, an algorithm is presented for the management of patients with biliary atresia.",
keywords = "Biliary atresia, hepatic portoenterostomy, liver transplantation",
author = "Wood, {R. Patrick} and Langnas, {Alan Norman} and Stratta, {Robert J.} and Pillen, {Todd J.} and Laurel Williams and Simone Lindsay and Diana Meiergerd and Shaw, {Byers W.}",
year = "1990",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0022-3468(05)80183-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "152--162",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Surgery",
issn = "0022-3468",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimal therapy for patients with biliary atresia

T2 - Portoenterostomy ("Kasai" procedures) versus primary transplantation

AU - Wood, R. Patrick

AU - Langnas, Alan Norman

AU - Stratta, Robert J.

AU - Pillen, Todd J.

AU - Williams, Laurel

AU - Lindsay, Simone

AU - Meiergerd, Diana

AU - Shaw, Byers W.

PY - 1990/1/1

Y1 - 1990/1/1

N2 - As the results with liver transplantation have improved, a controversy has arisen regarding the precise role of a portoenterostomy in the treatment of infants with biliary atresia. The controversy centers around three issues: (1) the short- and long-term survival rates achieved with both procedures, (2) the influence of a portoenterostomy on a subsequent transplant, and (3) the shortage of suitable liver donors for very small infants. To address these questions, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of 48 children with biliary atresia who underwent liver transplantation and compared these results with 35 children transplanted for other liver diseases. As a group, the biliary atresia patients had significantly lower mean body weights and ages and spent a significantly longer time on the waiting list. In addition, significantly more of the biliary atresia patients had undergone prior abdominal surgery when compared with the non-biliary atresia group. There was no difference in the intraoperative variables of mean anesthesia time, mean operative time, mean anesthesia preparation time, nor the mean amount of blood transfused intraoperatively between the two groups. However, when the biliary atresia patients who had undergone a portoenterostomy with a stoma were compared with either the biliary atresia patients who did not have a stoma created as part of their portoenterostomy or the non-biliary atresia patients, significant differences were noted in mean total anesthesia time, mean operative time, and the mean amount of blood transfused intraoperatively. The survival rate of the biliary atresia patients was significantly greater than the non-biliary atresia patients. The overall incidence of reoperations was not different between the two groups but reoperations on the biliary tract were significantly more common in the non-biliary atresia patients. Finally, when the biliary atresia patients who died while awaiting transplantation were compared with those who received transplants, the former group were found to be significantly younger and have a significantly lower mean body weight than the group who received transplants. Based on our data and a review of the literature, an algorithm is presented for the management of patients with biliary atresia.

AB - As the results with liver transplantation have improved, a controversy has arisen regarding the precise role of a portoenterostomy in the treatment of infants with biliary atresia. The controversy centers around three issues: (1) the short- and long-term survival rates achieved with both procedures, (2) the influence of a portoenterostomy on a subsequent transplant, and (3) the shortage of suitable liver donors for very small infants. To address these questions, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of 48 children with biliary atresia who underwent liver transplantation and compared these results with 35 children transplanted for other liver diseases. As a group, the biliary atresia patients had significantly lower mean body weights and ages and spent a significantly longer time on the waiting list. In addition, significantly more of the biliary atresia patients had undergone prior abdominal surgery when compared with the non-biliary atresia group. There was no difference in the intraoperative variables of mean anesthesia time, mean operative time, mean anesthesia preparation time, nor the mean amount of blood transfused intraoperatively between the two groups. However, when the biliary atresia patients who had undergone a portoenterostomy with a stoma were compared with either the biliary atresia patients who did not have a stoma created as part of their portoenterostomy or the non-biliary atresia patients, significant differences were noted in mean total anesthesia time, mean operative time, and the mean amount of blood transfused intraoperatively. The survival rate of the biliary atresia patients was significantly greater than the non-biliary atresia patients. The overall incidence of reoperations was not different between the two groups but reoperations on the biliary tract were significantly more common in the non-biliary atresia patients. Finally, when the biliary atresia patients who died while awaiting transplantation were compared with those who received transplants, the former group were found to be significantly younger and have a significantly lower mean body weight than the group who received transplants. Based on our data and a review of the literature, an algorithm is presented for the management of patients with biliary atresia.

KW - Biliary atresia

KW - hepatic portoenterostomy

KW - liver transplantation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025128650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025128650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-3468(05)80183-6

DO - 10.1016/S0022-3468(05)80183-6

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 152

EP - 162

JO - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

JF - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

SN - 0022-3468

IS - 1

ER -