Optimal sample sizes for group testing in two-stage sampling

Osval Antonio Montesinos-López, Kent Eskridge, Abelardo Montesinos-López, José Crossa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Optimal sample sizes under a budget constraint for estimating a proportion in a two-stage sampling process have been derived using individual testing. However, when group testing is used, these optimal sample sizes are not appropriate. In this study, optimal sample sizes at the cluster and individual levels are derived for group testing. First, optimal allocations of clusters and individuals are obtained under the assumption of equal cluster sizes. Second, we obtain the relative efficiency (RE) of unequal versus equal cluster sizes when estimating the average population proportion, π. By multiplying the sample of clusters obtained assuming equal cluster size by the inverse of the RE, we adjust the sample size required in the context of unequal cluster sizes. We also show the adjustments that need to be made to allocate clusters and individuals correctly in order to estimate the required budget and achieve a certain power or precision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)12-28
Number of pages17
JournalSeed Science Research
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 26 2015

Fingerprint

group size
testing
sampling

Keywords

  • Group testing
  • optimal power
  • precision
  • relative efficiency
  • sample size

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Plant Science

Cite this

Optimal sample sizes for group testing in two-stage sampling. / Montesinos-López, Osval Antonio; Eskridge, Kent; Montesinos-López, Abelardo; Crossa, José.

In: Seed Science Research, Vol. 25, No. 1, 26.03.2015, p. 12-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Montesinos-López, OA, Eskridge, K, Montesinos-López, A & Crossa, J 2015, 'Optimal sample sizes for group testing in two-stage sampling', Seed Science Research, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 12-28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S096025851400035X
Montesinos-López, Osval Antonio ; Eskridge, Kent ; Montesinos-López, Abelardo ; Crossa, José. / Optimal sample sizes for group testing in two-stage sampling. In: Seed Science Research. 2015 ; Vol. 25, No. 1. pp. 12-28.
@article{c02301e090004ab3874af70438d82d0e,
title = "Optimal sample sizes for group testing in two-stage sampling",
abstract = "Optimal sample sizes under a budget constraint for estimating a proportion in a two-stage sampling process have been derived using individual testing. However, when group testing is used, these optimal sample sizes are not appropriate. In this study, optimal sample sizes at the cluster and individual levels are derived for group testing. First, optimal allocations of clusters and individuals are obtained under the assumption of equal cluster sizes. Second, we obtain the relative efficiency (RE) of unequal versus equal cluster sizes when estimating the average population proportion, π. By multiplying the sample of clusters obtained assuming equal cluster size by the inverse of the RE, we adjust the sample size required in the context of unequal cluster sizes. We also show the adjustments that need to be made to allocate clusters and individuals correctly in order to estimate the required budget and achieve a certain power or precision.",
keywords = "Group testing, optimal power, precision, relative efficiency, sample size",
author = "Montesinos-L{\'o}pez, {Osval Antonio} and Kent Eskridge and Abelardo Montesinos-L{\'o}pez and Jos{\'e} Crossa",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1017/S096025851400035X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "12--28",
journal = "Seed Science Research",
issn = "0960-2585",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimal sample sizes for group testing in two-stage sampling

AU - Montesinos-López, Osval Antonio

AU - Eskridge, Kent

AU - Montesinos-López, Abelardo

AU - Crossa, José

PY - 2015/3/26

Y1 - 2015/3/26

N2 - Optimal sample sizes under a budget constraint for estimating a proportion in a two-stage sampling process have been derived using individual testing. However, when group testing is used, these optimal sample sizes are not appropriate. In this study, optimal sample sizes at the cluster and individual levels are derived for group testing. First, optimal allocations of clusters and individuals are obtained under the assumption of equal cluster sizes. Second, we obtain the relative efficiency (RE) of unequal versus equal cluster sizes when estimating the average population proportion, π. By multiplying the sample of clusters obtained assuming equal cluster size by the inverse of the RE, we adjust the sample size required in the context of unequal cluster sizes. We also show the adjustments that need to be made to allocate clusters and individuals correctly in order to estimate the required budget and achieve a certain power or precision.

AB - Optimal sample sizes under a budget constraint for estimating a proportion in a two-stage sampling process have been derived using individual testing. However, when group testing is used, these optimal sample sizes are not appropriate. In this study, optimal sample sizes at the cluster and individual levels are derived for group testing. First, optimal allocations of clusters and individuals are obtained under the assumption of equal cluster sizes. Second, we obtain the relative efficiency (RE) of unequal versus equal cluster sizes when estimating the average population proportion, π. By multiplying the sample of clusters obtained assuming equal cluster size by the inverse of the RE, we adjust the sample size required in the context of unequal cluster sizes. We also show the adjustments that need to be made to allocate clusters and individuals correctly in order to estimate the required budget and achieve a certain power or precision.

KW - Group testing

KW - optimal power

KW - precision

KW - relative efficiency

KW - sample size

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923644268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923644268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S096025851400035X

DO - 10.1017/S096025851400035X

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84923644268

VL - 25

SP - 12

EP - 28

JO - Seed Science Research

JF - Seed Science Research

SN - 0960-2585

IS - 1

ER -