Optimal recording electrode placement in the lumbrical-interossei comparison study

Amer Al-Shekhlee, Jose A. Fernandes Filho, Devraj Sukul, David C. Preston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The lumbrical-interossei comparison study is commonly employed in the electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Placement of the recording electrodes relies on anatomic landmarks as the muscles being recorded cannot be seen or palpated. To determine the optimal active electrode location, 15 controls and 5 patients were studied using a grid of 12 electrodes placed over the lateral palm. Amplitudes, rise-times, and latencies of the responses at each location were measured. The lowest control latency difference was located in the lateral mid-proximal palm (mean 0 ms, upper range of 0.5 ms). This location also had the highest lumbrical amplitude and rise-time. More distal in the palm, the mean latency difference increased to 0.5 ms with an upper range of 0.9 ms. When performing the lumbrical-interossei comparison study, it is essential to place the active recording electrode in the optimal location. Failure to do so will result in an increased number of false-positive studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)289-293
Number of pages5
JournalMuscle and Nerve
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2006

Fingerprint

Electrodes
Electrodiagnosis
Anatomic Landmarks
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Reaction Time
Muscles

Keywords

  • Carpal tunnel syndrome
  • Electromyography
  • Interossei
  • Lumbrical
  • Nerve conduction studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Optimal recording electrode placement in the lumbrical-interossei comparison study. / Al-Shekhlee, Amer; Fernandes Filho, Jose A.; Sukul, Devraj; Preston, David C.

In: Muscle and Nerve, Vol. 33, No. 2, 01.02.2006, p. 289-293.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Al-Shekhlee, Amer ; Fernandes Filho, Jose A. ; Sukul, Devraj ; Preston, David C. / Optimal recording electrode placement in the lumbrical-interossei comparison study. In: Muscle and Nerve. 2006 ; Vol. 33, No. 2. pp. 289-293.
@article{f5d3ec6347be454d966cc7cd9abae303,
title = "Optimal recording electrode placement in the lumbrical-interossei comparison study",
abstract = "The lumbrical-interossei comparison study is commonly employed in the electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Placement of the recording electrodes relies on anatomic landmarks as the muscles being recorded cannot be seen or palpated. To determine the optimal active electrode location, 15 controls and 5 patients were studied using a grid of 12 electrodes placed over the lateral palm. Amplitudes, rise-times, and latencies of the responses at each location were measured. The lowest control latency difference was located in the lateral mid-proximal palm (mean 0 ms, upper range of 0.5 ms). This location also had the highest lumbrical amplitude and rise-time. More distal in the palm, the mean latency difference increased to 0.5 ms with an upper range of 0.9 ms. When performing the lumbrical-interossei comparison study, it is essential to place the active recording electrode in the optimal location. Failure to do so will result in an increased number of false-positive studies.",
keywords = "Carpal tunnel syndrome, Electromyography, Interossei, Lumbrical, Nerve conduction studies",
author = "Amer Al-Shekhlee and {Fernandes Filho}, {Jose A.} and Devraj Sukul and Preston, {David C.}",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/mus.20488",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "289--293",
journal = "Muscle & nerve",
issn = "0148-639X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimal recording electrode placement in the lumbrical-interossei comparison study

AU - Al-Shekhlee, Amer

AU - Fernandes Filho, Jose A.

AU - Sukul, Devraj

AU - Preston, David C.

PY - 2006/2/1

Y1 - 2006/2/1

N2 - The lumbrical-interossei comparison study is commonly employed in the electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Placement of the recording electrodes relies on anatomic landmarks as the muscles being recorded cannot be seen or palpated. To determine the optimal active electrode location, 15 controls and 5 patients were studied using a grid of 12 electrodes placed over the lateral palm. Amplitudes, rise-times, and latencies of the responses at each location were measured. The lowest control latency difference was located in the lateral mid-proximal palm (mean 0 ms, upper range of 0.5 ms). This location also had the highest lumbrical amplitude and rise-time. More distal in the palm, the mean latency difference increased to 0.5 ms with an upper range of 0.9 ms. When performing the lumbrical-interossei comparison study, it is essential to place the active recording electrode in the optimal location. Failure to do so will result in an increased number of false-positive studies.

AB - The lumbrical-interossei comparison study is commonly employed in the electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Placement of the recording electrodes relies on anatomic landmarks as the muscles being recorded cannot be seen or palpated. To determine the optimal active electrode location, 15 controls and 5 patients were studied using a grid of 12 electrodes placed over the lateral palm. Amplitudes, rise-times, and latencies of the responses at each location were measured. The lowest control latency difference was located in the lateral mid-proximal palm (mean 0 ms, upper range of 0.5 ms). This location also had the highest lumbrical amplitude and rise-time. More distal in the palm, the mean latency difference increased to 0.5 ms with an upper range of 0.9 ms. When performing the lumbrical-interossei comparison study, it is essential to place the active recording electrode in the optimal location. Failure to do so will result in an increased number of false-positive studies.

KW - Carpal tunnel syndrome

KW - Electromyography

KW - Interossei

KW - Lumbrical

KW - Nerve conduction studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=32144451515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=32144451515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mus.20488

DO - 10.1002/mus.20488

M3 - Article

C2 - 16323218

AN - SCOPUS:32144451515

VL - 33

SP - 289

EP - 293

JO - Muscle & nerve

JF - Muscle & nerve

SN - 0148-639X

IS - 2

ER -