Opportunities and limitations of contingent valuation surveys to determine national park entrance fees: Evidence from Costa Rica

Steven Shultz, Jorge Pinazzo, Miguel Cifuentes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A contingent valuation method (CVM) survey to determine foreign and resident willingness to pay (WTP) for return visits to two different Costa Rican national parks was administered in 1995. WTP values were estimated for future entrance fees associated with proposed improvements to infrastructure and services in the Poas Volcano and the Manuel Antonio parks. Resulting logistic CVM models were statistically robust and mean WTP for entrance fees differed among the parks and were considerably higher than current fees. Results indicate that even in a developing country setting, the CVM is a useful tool to help determine park entrance fees in spite of the following methodological limitations which are recommended for further study: the need to include potential park visitors in survey samples; the lack of detailed information framing and contingent scenarios for park related WTP questions; and the threat of cultural-strategic biases when surveying residents of a developing country.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)131-149
Number of pages19
JournalEnvironment and Development Economics
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1998

Fingerprint

contingent valuation
Costa Rica
willingness to pay
national park
fee
evidence
developing world
developing country
resident
surveying
logistics
volcano
infrastructure
Contingent valuation
National parks
Fees
threat
scenario
Willingness-to-pay
lack

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Opportunities and limitations of contingent valuation surveys to determine national park entrance fees : Evidence from Costa Rica. / Shultz, Steven; Pinazzo, Jorge; Cifuentes, Miguel.

In: Environment and Development Economics, Vol. 3, No. 1, 02.1998, p. 131-149.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{10211f7a1b12404ea10e04275cb18c79,
title = "Opportunities and limitations of contingent valuation surveys to determine national park entrance fees: Evidence from Costa Rica",
abstract = "A contingent valuation method (CVM) survey to determine foreign and resident willingness to pay (WTP) for return visits to two different Costa Rican national parks was administered in 1995. WTP values were estimated for future entrance fees associated with proposed improvements to infrastructure and services in the Poas Volcano and the Manuel Antonio parks. Resulting logistic CVM models were statistically robust and mean WTP for entrance fees differed among the parks and were considerably higher than current fees. Results indicate that even in a developing country setting, the CVM is a useful tool to help determine park entrance fees in spite of the following methodological limitations which are recommended for further study: the need to include potential park visitors in survey samples; the lack of detailed information framing and contingent scenarios for park related WTP questions; and the threat of cultural-strategic biases when surveying residents of a developing country.",
author = "Steven Shultz and Jorge Pinazzo and Miguel Cifuentes",
year = "1998",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1017/S1355770X98000072",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "131--149",
journal = "Environment and Development Economics",
issn = "1355-770X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Opportunities and limitations of contingent valuation surveys to determine national park entrance fees

T2 - Evidence from Costa Rica

AU - Shultz, Steven

AU - Pinazzo, Jorge

AU - Cifuentes, Miguel

PY - 1998/2

Y1 - 1998/2

N2 - A contingent valuation method (CVM) survey to determine foreign and resident willingness to pay (WTP) for return visits to two different Costa Rican national parks was administered in 1995. WTP values were estimated for future entrance fees associated with proposed improvements to infrastructure and services in the Poas Volcano and the Manuel Antonio parks. Resulting logistic CVM models were statistically robust and mean WTP for entrance fees differed among the parks and were considerably higher than current fees. Results indicate that even in a developing country setting, the CVM is a useful tool to help determine park entrance fees in spite of the following methodological limitations which are recommended for further study: the need to include potential park visitors in survey samples; the lack of detailed information framing and contingent scenarios for park related WTP questions; and the threat of cultural-strategic biases when surveying residents of a developing country.

AB - A contingent valuation method (CVM) survey to determine foreign and resident willingness to pay (WTP) for return visits to two different Costa Rican national parks was administered in 1995. WTP values were estimated for future entrance fees associated with proposed improvements to infrastructure and services in the Poas Volcano and the Manuel Antonio parks. Resulting logistic CVM models were statistically robust and mean WTP for entrance fees differed among the parks and were considerably higher than current fees. Results indicate that even in a developing country setting, the CVM is a useful tool to help determine park entrance fees in spite of the following methodological limitations which are recommended for further study: the need to include potential park visitors in survey samples; the lack of detailed information framing and contingent scenarios for park related WTP questions; and the threat of cultural-strategic biases when surveying residents of a developing country.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000555951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000555951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1355770X98000072

DO - 10.1017/S1355770X98000072

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0000555951

VL - 3

SP - 131

EP - 149

JO - Environment and Development Economics

JF - Environment and Development Economics

SN - 1355-770X

IS - 1

ER -