Operative mechanisms of noncontingent reinforcement at varying magnitudes and schedules

David A. Wilder, Wayne W. Fisher, Bonita M. Anders, Jennifer J. Cercone, Pamela L. Neidert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In order to examine the mechanism(s) responsible for response reductions from noncontingent reinforcement (NCR), multiple magnitudes and densities of NCR were superimposed on a variable ratio (VR) 3 schedule of contingent reinforcement for the performance of an arbitrary manual response. Data were collected on responding that occurred during access to the reinforcer separately from responding that occurred between reinforcer access intervals (i.e., when the participant did not have access to the reinforcer). Higher magnitudes and denser schedules of NCR produced greater reductions in responding than did lower magnitudes and leaner schedules. Within-session response patterns suggested that decrements in responding were primarily a function of the increased amount of reinforcer access time associated with higher magnitudes and denser schedules of NCR. That is, it appeared that the participant consumed reinforcers (regardless of whether they were delivered contingently or noncontingently) when they were available and responded for contingent reinforcers primarily when reinforcers were absent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)117-124
Number of pages8
JournalResearch in Developmental Disabilities
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 10 2001

Fingerprint

Reinforcement Schedule
Appointments and Schedules
Reinforcement (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Choice
  • Establishing operations
  • Extinction
  • Noncontingent reinforcement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Operative mechanisms of noncontingent reinforcement at varying magnitudes and schedules. / Wilder, David A.; Fisher, Wayne W.; Anders, Bonita M.; Cercone, Jennifer J.; Neidert, Pamela L.

In: Research in Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 22, No. 2, 10.04.2001, p. 117-124.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wilder, David A. ; Fisher, Wayne W. ; Anders, Bonita M. ; Cercone, Jennifer J. ; Neidert, Pamela L. / Operative mechanisms of noncontingent reinforcement at varying magnitudes and schedules. In: Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2001 ; Vol. 22, No. 2. pp. 117-124.
@article{a0ca195f03d94cb895f9fd4dbf8503b4,
title = "Operative mechanisms of noncontingent reinforcement at varying magnitudes and schedules",
abstract = "In order to examine the mechanism(s) responsible for response reductions from noncontingent reinforcement (NCR), multiple magnitudes and densities of NCR were superimposed on a variable ratio (VR) 3 schedule of contingent reinforcement for the performance of an arbitrary manual response. Data were collected on responding that occurred during access to the reinforcer separately from responding that occurred between reinforcer access intervals (i.e., when the participant did not have access to the reinforcer). Higher magnitudes and denser schedules of NCR produced greater reductions in responding than did lower magnitudes and leaner schedules. Within-session response patterns suggested that decrements in responding were primarily a function of the increased amount of reinforcer access time associated with higher magnitudes and denser schedules of NCR. That is, it appeared that the participant consumed reinforcers (regardless of whether they were delivered contingently or noncontingently) when they were available and responded for contingent reinforcers primarily when reinforcers were absent.",
keywords = "Choice, Establishing operations, Extinction, Noncontingent reinforcement",
author = "Wilder, {David A.} and Fisher, {Wayne W.} and Anders, {Bonita M.} and Cercone, {Jennifer J.} and Neidert, {Pamela L.}",
year = "2001",
month = "4",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1016/S0891-4222(01)00061-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "117--124",
journal = "Research in Developmental Disabilities",
issn = "0891-4222",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Operative mechanisms of noncontingent reinforcement at varying magnitudes and schedules

AU - Wilder, David A.

AU - Fisher, Wayne W.

AU - Anders, Bonita M.

AU - Cercone, Jennifer J.

AU - Neidert, Pamela L.

PY - 2001/4/10

Y1 - 2001/4/10

N2 - In order to examine the mechanism(s) responsible for response reductions from noncontingent reinforcement (NCR), multiple magnitudes and densities of NCR were superimposed on a variable ratio (VR) 3 schedule of contingent reinforcement for the performance of an arbitrary manual response. Data were collected on responding that occurred during access to the reinforcer separately from responding that occurred between reinforcer access intervals (i.e., when the participant did not have access to the reinforcer). Higher magnitudes and denser schedules of NCR produced greater reductions in responding than did lower magnitudes and leaner schedules. Within-session response patterns suggested that decrements in responding were primarily a function of the increased amount of reinforcer access time associated with higher magnitudes and denser schedules of NCR. That is, it appeared that the participant consumed reinforcers (regardless of whether they were delivered contingently or noncontingently) when they were available and responded for contingent reinforcers primarily when reinforcers were absent.

AB - In order to examine the mechanism(s) responsible for response reductions from noncontingent reinforcement (NCR), multiple magnitudes and densities of NCR were superimposed on a variable ratio (VR) 3 schedule of contingent reinforcement for the performance of an arbitrary manual response. Data were collected on responding that occurred during access to the reinforcer separately from responding that occurred between reinforcer access intervals (i.e., when the participant did not have access to the reinforcer). Higher magnitudes and denser schedules of NCR produced greater reductions in responding than did lower magnitudes and leaner schedules. Within-session response patterns suggested that decrements in responding were primarily a function of the increased amount of reinforcer access time associated with higher magnitudes and denser schedules of NCR. That is, it appeared that the participant consumed reinforcers (regardless of whether they were delivered contingently or noncontingently) when they were available and responded for contingent reinforcers primarily when reinforcers were absent.

KW - Choice

KW - Establishing operations

KW - Extinction

KW - Noncontingent reinforcement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035077618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035077618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0891-4222(01)00061-0

DO - 10.1016/S0891-4222(01)00061-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 11325159

AN - SCOPUS:0035077618

VL - 22

SP - 117

EP - 124

JO - Research in Developmental Disabilities

JF - Research in Developmental Disabilities

SN - 0891-4222

IS - 2

ER -