Online administration of questionnaires assessing psychological, physical, and sexual aggression: Establishing psychometric equivalence

Rebecca L. Brock, Robin A. Barry, Erika Lawrence, Jaci Rolffs, Jodi Cerretani, Amie Zarling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The study of intimate partner violence has long been a funding priority and a focus of research, necessitating the assessment of aggression with large samples. In response, online assessment has become increasingly common, particularly when studying college students. However, it is unclear whether measures of partner aggression can be reliably and validly administered online. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the psychometric equivalence of written and Internet formats of questionnaires commonly used in the study of partner aggression to inform researchers considering a transition to online data collection. Method: Self-report questionnaires assessing psychological and physical aggression as well as measures of related interpersonal and intrapersonal constructs were administered to 169 young adults in committed dating relationships. The same measures were administered twice via written and/or online methods over a 2-week period. Method order was counterbalanced among participants and temporal stability was controlled. Results: Measures of aggression generally demonstrated psychometric equivalence across methods with few exceptions. Conclusions: Results support the use of online versions of the CTS2 and MDEAS, and highlight the utility of collecting aggression data online. Results suggest that participants may provide more reliable and dependable responses under conditions of perceived anonymity afforded by online administration of aggression questionnaires.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)294-304
Number of pages11
JournalPsychology of Violence
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

Fingerprint

equivalence
Aggression
Psychometrics
psychometrics
aggression
Psychology
questionnaire
anonymity
Surveys and Questionnaires
Internet
Self Report
young adult
Young Adult
funding
Research Personnel
violence
Students
Research
student

Keywords

  • Internet
  • domestic violence
  • intimate partner violence
  • online
  • physical aggression
  • psychological aggression
  • psychometrics
  • sexual coercion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Health(social science)
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Online administration of questionnaires assessing psychological, physical, and sexual aggression : Establishing psychometric equivalence. / Brock, Rebecca L.; Barry, Robin A.; Lawrence, Erika; Rolffs, Jaci; Cerretani, Jodi; Zarling, Amie.

In: Psychology of Violence, Vol. 5, No. 3, 01.07.2015, p. 294-304.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brock, Rebecca L. ; Barry, Robin A. ; Lawrence, Erika ; Rolffs, Jaci ; Cerretani, Jodi ; Zarling, Amie. / Online administration of questionnaires assessing psychological, physical, and sexual aggression : Establishing psychometric equivalence. In: Psychology of Violence. 2015 ; Vol. 5, No. 3. pp. 294-304.
@article{7383e8a3fa93402f9b1726176ef641be,
title = "Online administration of questionnaires assessing psychological, physical, and sexual aggression: Establishing psychometric equivalence",
abstract = "Objective: The study of intimate partner violence has long been a funding priority and a focus of research, necessitating the assessment of aggression with large samples. In response, online assessment has become increasingly common, particularly when studying college students. However, it is unclear whether measures of partner aggression can be reliably and validly administered online. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the psychometric equivalence of written and Internet formats of questionnaires commonly used in the study of partner aggression to inform researchers considering a transition to online data collection. Method: Self-report questionnaires assessing psychological and physical aggression as well as measures of related interpersonal and intrapersonal constructs were administered to 169 young adults in committed dating relationships. The same measures were administered twice via written and/or online methods over a 2-week period. Method order was counterbalanced among participants and temporal stability was controlled. Results: Measures of aggression generally demonstrated psychometric equivalence across methods with few exceptions. Conclusions: Results support the use of online versions of the CTS2 and MDEAS, and highlight the utility of collecting aggression data online. Results suggest that participants may provide more reliable and dependable responses under conditions of perceived anonymity afforded by online administration of aggression questionnaires.",
keywords = "Internet, domestic violence, intimate partner violence, online, physical aggression, psychological aggression, psychometrics, sexual coercion",
author = "Brock, {Rebecca L.} and Barry, {Robin A.} and Erika Lawrence and Jaci Rolffs and Jodi Cerretani and Amie Zarling",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0037835",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "294--304",
journal = "Psychology of Violence",
issn = "2152-0828",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Online administration of questionnaires assessing psychological, physical, and sexual aggression

T2 - Establishing psychometric equivalence

AU - Brock, Rebecca L.

AU - Barry, Robin A.

AU - Lawrence, Erika

AU - Rolffs, Jaci

AU - Cerretani, Jodi

AU - Zarling, Amie

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - Objective: The study of intimate partner violence has long been a funding priority and a focus of research, necessitating the assessment of aggression with large samples. In response, online assessment has become increasingly common, particularly when studying college students. However, it is unclear whether measures of partner aggression can be reliably and validly administered online. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the psychometric equivalence of written and Internet formats of questionnaires commonly used in the study of partner aggression to inform researchers considering a transition to online data collection. Method: Self-report questionnaires assessing psychological and physical aggression as well as measures of related interpersonal and intrapersonal constructs were administered to 169 young adults in committed dating relationships. The same measures were administered twice via written and/or online methods over a 2-week period. Method order was counterbalanced among participants and temporal stability was controlled. Results: Measures of aggression generally demonstrated psychometric equivalence across methods with few exceptions. Conclusions: Results support the use of online versions of the CTS2 and MDEAS, and highlight the utility of collecting aggression data online. Results suggest that participants may provide more reliable and dependable responses under conditions of perceived anonymity afforded by online administration of aggression questionnaires.

AB - Objective: The study of intimate partner violence has long been a funding priority and a focus of research, necessitating the assessment of aggression with large samples. In response, online assessment has become increasingly common, particularly when studying college students. However, it is unclear whether measures of partner aggression can be reliably and validly administered online. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the psychometric equivalence of written and Internet formats of questionnaires commonly used in the study of partner aggression to inform researchers considering a transition to online data collection. Method: Self-report questionnaires assessing psychological and physical aggression as well as measures of related interpersonal and intrapersonal constructs were administered to 169 young adults in committed dating relationships. The same measures were administered twice via written and/or online methods over a 2-week period. Method order was counterbalanced among participants and temporal stability was controlled. Results: Measures of aggression generally demonstrated psychometric equivalence across methods with few exceptions. Conclusions: Results support the use of online versions of the CTS2 and MDEAS, and highlight the utility of collecting aggression data online. Results suggest that participants may provide more reliable and dependable responses under conditions of perceived anonymity afforded by online administration of aggression questionnaires.

KW - Internet

KW - domestic violence

KW - intimate partner violence

KW - online

KW - physical aggression

KW - psychological aggression

KW - psychometrics

KW - sexual coercion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84931062249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84931062249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0037835

DO - 10.1037/a0037835

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84931062249

VL - 5

SP - 294

EP - 304

JO - Psychology of Violence

JF - Psychology of Violence

SN - 2152-0828

IS - 3

ER -