On-Board Patient Positioning for Head-and-Neck IMRT: Comparing Digital Tomosynthesis to Kilovoltage Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Q. Jackie Wu, Devon J. Godfrey, Zhiheng Wang, Junan Zhang, Sumin Zhou, Sua Yoo, David M. Brizel, Fang Fang Yin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: High-precision intensity-modulated radiotherapy demands high patient positioning accuracy. On-board digital tomosynthesis (DTS) provides three-dimensional (3D) image guidance for daily positioning with a lower imaging dose, faster acquisition, and more geometric flexibility than 3D cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). This clinical study evaluated DTS as a daily imaging technique for patient positioning and compared the results with 3D CBCT and two-dimensional (2D) radiography. Methods and Materials: Head and neck cancer patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy were studied. For each session, the patient was positioned using laser marks. On-board imaging data sets, including 2D kilovoltage radiographs, DTS, and CBCT, were obtained to measure the daily patient positioning variations. The mean and standard deviations of the positioning variations in the translational and rotational directions were calculated. The positioning differences among 2D radiography, DTS, and CBCT were analyzed. Results: Image data sets were collected from 65 treatment fractions for 10 patients. The systematic patient positioning variation was <0.10 cm and 1.0° one dimensionally. The random variations were 0.27-0.34 cm in the translational and 0.93°-1.99° in the rotational direction. The mean vector isocenter variation was 0.48 cm. DTS with 40° and 20° scan angles in the coronal or sagittal directions yielded the same results for patient positioning. DTS performance was comparable to that of CBCT, with positioning differences of <0.1 cm and 0.5°. The positioning difference between 2D radiography and DTS was ∼0.1 cm and 0.2 cm in the vertical/longitudinal and lateral directions. Conclusion: Our results have demonstrated that DTS is a comparable 3D imaging technique to CBCT for daily patient positioning of head-and-neck patients as determined by manual registration of bony anatomy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)598-606
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume69
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2007

Fingerprint

Patient Positioning
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
radiography
Radiography
positioning
cones
Neck
tomography
Head
Radiographic Image Enhancement
Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Three-Dimensional Imaging
imaging techniques
Head and Neck Neoplasms
radiation therapy
Anatomy
Lasers
anatomy
Direction compound
standard deviation

Keywords

  • CBCT
  • Cone-beam computed tomography
  • DTS
  • Digital tomosynthesis
  • Head and neck cancer
  • Image-guided radiotherapy
  • On-board imaging
  • Setup variation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiation
  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

On-Board Patient Positioning for Head-and-Neck IMRT : Comparing Digital Tomosynthesis to Kilovoltage Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. / Wu, Q. Jackie; Godfrey, Devon J.; Wang, Zhiheng; Zhang, Junan; Zhou, Sumin; Yoo, Sua; Brizel, David M.; Yin, Fang Fang.

In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, Vol. 69, No. 2, 01.10.2007, p. 598-606.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wu, Q. Jackie ; Godfrey, Devon J. ; Wang, Zhiheng ; Zhang, Junan ; Zhou, Sumin ; Yoo, Sua ; Brizel, David M. ; Yin, Fang Fang. / On-Board Patient Positioning for Head-and-Neck IMRT : Comparing Digital Tomosynthesis to Kilovoltage Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2007 ; Vol. 69, No. 2. pp. 598-606.
@article{1f9e3736c2ef4f09b6d0a09718c14ee2,
title = "On-Board Patient Positioning for Head-and-Neck IMRT: Comparing Digital Tomosynthesis to Kilovoltage Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography",
abstract = "Purpose: High-precision intensity-modulated radiotherapy demands high patient positioning accuracy. On-board digital tomosynthesis (DTS) provides three-dimensional (3D) image guidance for daily positioning with a lower imaging dose, faster acquisition, and more geometric flexibility than 3D cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). This clinical study evaluated DTS as a daily imaging technique for patient positioning and compared the results with 3D CBCT and two-dimensional (2D) radiography. Methods and Materials: Head and neck cancer patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy were studied. For each session, the patient was positioned using laser marks. On-board imaging data sets, including 2D kilovoltage radiographs, DTS, and CBCT, were obtained to measure the daily patient positioning variations. The mean and standard deviations of the positioning variations in the translational and rotational directions were calculated. The positioning differences among 2D radiography, DTS, and CBCT were analyzed. Results: Image data sets were collected from 65 treatment fractions for 10 patients. The systematic patient positioning variation was <0.10 cm and 1.0° one dimensionally. The random variations were 0.27-0.34 cm in the translational and 0.93°-1.99° in the rotational direction. The mean vector isocenter variation was 0.48 cm. DTS with 40° and 20° scan angles in the coronal or sagittal directions yielded the same results for patient positioning. DTS performance was comparable to that of CBCT, with positioning differences of <0.1 cm and 0.5°. The positioning difference between 2D radiography and DTS was ∼0.1 cm and 0.2 cm in the vertical/longitudinal and lateral directions. Conclusion: Our results have demonstrated that DTS is a comparable 3D imaging technique to CBCT for daily patient positioning of head-and-neck patients as determined by manual registration of bony anatomy.",
keywords = "CBCT, Cone-beam computed tomography, DTS, Digital tomosynthesis, Head and neck cancer, Image-guided radiotherapy, On-board imaging, Setup variation",
author = "Wu, {Q. Jackie} and Godfrey, {Devon J.} and Zhiheng Wang and Junan Zhang and Sumin Zhou and Sua Yoo and Brizel, {David M.} and Yin, {Fang Fang}",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.045",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "598--606",
journal = "International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics",
issn = "0360-3016",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On-Board Patient Positioning for Head-and-Neck IMRT

T2 - Comparing Digital Tomosynthesis to Kilovoltage Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

AU - Wu, Q. Jackie

AU - Godfrey, Devon J.

AU - Wang, Zhiheng

AU - Zhang, Junan

AU - Zhou, Sumin

AU - Yoo, Sua

AU - Brizel, David M.

AU - Yin, Fang Fang

PY - 2007/10/1

Y1 - 2007/10/1

N2 - Purpose: High-precision intensity-modulated radiotherapy demands high patient positioning accuracy. On-board digital tomosynthesis (DTS) provides three-dimensional (3D) image guidance for daily positioning with a lower imaging dose, faster acquisition, and more geometric flexibility than 3D cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). This clinical study evaluated DTS as a daily imaging technique for patient positioning and compared the results with 3D CBCT and two-dimensional (2D) radiography. Methods and Materials: Head and neck cancer patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy were studied. For each session, the patient was positioned using laser marks. On-board imaging data sets, including 2D kilovoltage radiographs, DTS, and CBCT, were obtained to measure the daily patient positioning variations. The mean and standard deviations of the positioning variations in the translational and rotational directions were calculated. The positioning differences among 2D radiography, DTS, and CBCT were analyzed. Results: Image data sets were collected from 65 treatment fractions for 10 patients. The systematic patient positioning variation was <0.10 cm and 1.0° one dimensionally. The random variations were 0.27-0.34 cm in the translational and 0.93°-1.99° in the rotational direction. The mean vector isocenter variation was 0.48 cm. DTS with 40° and 20° scan angles in the coronal or sagittal directions yielded the same results for patient positioning. DTS performance was comparable to that of CBCT, with positioning differences of <0.1 cm and 0.5°. The positioning difference between 2D radiography and DTS was ∼0.1 cm and 0.2 cm in the vertical/longitudinal and lateral directions. Conclusion: Our results have demonstrated that DTS is a comparable 3D imaging technique to CBCT for daily patient positioning of head-and-neck patients as determined by manual registration of bony anatomy.

AB - Purpose: High-precision intensity-modulated radiotherapy demands high patient positioning accuracy. On-board digital tomosynthesis (DTS) provides three-dimensional (3D) image guidance for daily positioning with a lower imaging dose, faster acquisition, and more geometric flexibility than 3D cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). This clinical study evaluated DTS as a daily imaging technique for patient positioning and compared the results with 3D CBCT and two-dimensional (2D) radiography. Methods and Materials: Head and neck cancer patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy were studied. For each session, the patient was positioned using laser marks. On-board imaging data sets, including 2D kilovoltage radiographs, DTS, and CBCT, were obtained to measure the daily patient positioning variations. The mean and standard deviations of the positioning variations in the translational and rotational directions were calculated. The positioning differences among 2D radiography, DTS, and CBCT were analyzed. Results: Image data sets were collected from 65 treatment fractions for 10 patients. The systematic patient positioning variation was <0.10 cm and 1.0° one dimensionally. The random variations were 0.27-0.34 cm in the translational and 0.93°-1.99° in the rotational direction. The mean vector isocenter variation was 0.48 cm. DTS with 40° and 20° scan angles in the coronal or sagittal directions yielded the same results for patient positioning. DTS performance was comparable to that of CBCT, with positioning differences of <0.1 cm and 0.5°. The positioning difference between 2D radiography and DTS was ∼0.1 cm and 0.2 cm in the vertical/longitudinal and lateral directions. Conclusion: Our results have demonstrated that DTS is a comparable 3D imaging technique to CBCT for daily patient positioning of head-and-neck patients as determined by manual registration of bony anatomy.

KW - CBCT

KW - Cone-beam computed tomography

KW - DTS

KW - Digital tomosynthesis

KW - Head and neck cancer

KW - Image-guided radiotherapy

KW - On-board imaging

KW - Setup variation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548501324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548501324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.045

DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.045

M3 - Article

C2 - 17869673

AN - SCOPUS:34548501324

VL - 69

SP - 598

EP - 606

JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

SN - 0360-3016

IS - 2

ER -