Off-label medication use in adult critical care patients

Ishaq Lat, Scott Micek, Jeffrey Janzen, Henry Cohen, Keith Olsen, Curtis Haas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the use of off-label medications in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting and their varying levels of evidence. Materials and Methods: Thirty-seven ICUs from 24 US sites participated in this prospective, multicenter, observational study during a single 24-hour period. All medication orders were evaluated for Food and Drug Administration-labeled indications, strength of evidence, and strength of recommendation. Off-label medication orders were evaluated for indication, dose, route of administration, duration of therapy, and whether they were supported by institutional guidelines. Results: A total of 414 patients were enrolled, yielding 5237 medication orders for analysis. Of these, 1897 orders (36.2%) were off-label. The 3 drug classes that accounted for the most off-label orders were bronchorespiratory, gastrointestinal, and immunology. The majority of off-label medication orders (89.1%) were initiated after patient admission to the ICU. Nine hundred twenty-eight (48.3%) of the off-label medication orders had grade C or no evidence. Conclusions: The use of off-label medication therapies in the US adult critical care units is common, a majority of which are initiated after admission to the ICU and a significant portion of which are supported with inferior levels of evidence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)89-94
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Critical Care
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 1 2011

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Critical care
  • Intensive care
  • Off-label
  • Patient safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Lat, I., Micek, S., Janzen, J., Cohen, H., Olsen, K., & Haas, C. (2011). Off-label medication use in adult critical care patients. Journal of Critical Care, 26(1), 89-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.06.012