Ocular versus cervical VEMPs in the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome

M. Geraldine Zuniga, Kristen L Janky, Kimanh D. Nguyen, Miriam S. Welgampola, John P. Carey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) thresholds or ocular VEMP (oVEMP) amplitudes are more sensitive and specific in the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case-control study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with SCDS (mean age 48 yr; range, 31-66 yr) and 25 age-matched controls (mean age 48 yr; range, 30-66 yr). INTERVENTION(S): cVEMP and oVEMP in response to air-conducted sound. All patients underwent surgery for repair of SCDS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): cVEMP thresholds; oVEMP n10 and peak-to-peak amplitudes. RESULTS: cVEMP threshold results showed sensitivity and specificity ranging from 80% to 100% for the diagnosis of SCDS. In contrast, oVEMP amplitudes demonstrated sensitivity and specificity greater than 90%. CONCLUSION: oVEMP amplitudes are superior to cVEMP thresholds in the diagnosis of SCDS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)121-126
Number of pages6
JournalOtology and Neurotology
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials
Semicircular Canals
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tertiary Care Centers
Case-Control Studies
Air
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential
  • Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential
  • Superior canal dehiscence
  • Tone bursts
  • Vestibular

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Ocular versus cervical VEMPs in the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome. / Zuniga, M. Geraldine; Janky, Kristen L; Nguyen, Kimanh D.; Welgampola, Miriam S.; Carey, John P.

In: Otology and Neurotology, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.01.2013, p. 121-126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zuniga, M. Geraldine ; Janky, Kristen L ; Nguyen, Kimanh D. ; Welgampola, Miriam S. ; Carey, John P. / Ocular versus cervical VEMPs in the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome. In: Otology and Neurotology. 2013 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 121-126.
@article{e958f06512fa434ca85b36c5d0d8896d,
title = "Ocular versus cervical VEMPs in the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To determine whether cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) thresholds or ocular VEMP (oVEMP) amplitudes are more sensitive and specific in the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case-control study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with SCDS (mean age 48 yr; range, 31-66 yr) and 25 age-matched controls (mean age 48 yr; range, 30-66 yr). INTERVENTION(S): cVEMP and oVEMP in response to air-conducted sound. All patients underwent surgery for repair of SCDS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): cVEMP thresholds; oVEMP n10 and peak-to-peak amplitudes. RESULTS: cVEMP threshold results showed sensitivity and specificity ranging from 80{\%} to 100{\%} for the diagnosis of SCDS. In contrast, oVEMP amplitudes demonstrated sensitivity and specificity greater than 90{\%}. CONCLUSION: oVEMP amplitudes are superior to cVEMP thresholds in the diagnosis of SCDS.",
keywords = "Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential, Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential, Superior canal dehiscence, Tone bursts, Vestibular",
author = "Zuniga, {M. Geraldine} and Janky, {Kristen L} and Nguyen, {Kimanh D.} and Welgampola, {Miriam S.} and Carey, {John P.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MAO.0b013e31827136b0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "121--126",
journal = "Otology and Neurotology",
issn = "1531-7129",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ocular versus cervical VEMPs in the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome

AU - Zuniga, M. Geraldine

AU - Janky, Kristen L

AU - Nguyen, Kimanh D.

AU - Welgampola, Miriam S.

AU - Carey, John P.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To determine whether cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) thresholds or ocular VEMP (oVEMP) amplitudes are more sensitive and specific in the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case-control study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with SCDS (mean age 48 yr; range, 31-66 yr) and 25 age-matched controls (mean age 48 yr; range, 30-66 yr). INTERVENTION(S): cVEMP and oVEMP in response to air-conducted sound. All patients underwent surgery for repair of SCDS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): cVEMP thresholds; oVEMP n10 and peak-to-peak amplitudes. RESULTS: cVEMP threshold results showed sensitivity and specificity ranging from 80% to 100% for the diagnosis of SCDS. In contrast, oVEMP amplitudes demonstrated sensitivity and specificity greater than 90%. CONCLUSION: oVEMP amplitudes are superior to cVEMP thresholds in the diagnosis of SCDS.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To determine whether cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) thresholds or ocular VEMP (oVEMP) amplitudes are more sensitive and specific in the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case-control study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with SCDS (mean age 48 yr; range, 31-66 yr) and 25 age-matched controls (mean age 48 yr; range, 30-66 yr). INTERVENTION(S): cVEMP and oVEMP in response to air-conducted sound. All patients underwent surgery for repair of SCDS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): cVEMP thresholds; oVEMP n10 and peak-to-peak amplitudes. RESULTS: cVEMP threshold results showed sensitivity and specificity ranging from 80% to 100% for the diagnosis of SCDS. In contrast, oVEMP amplitudes demonstrated sensitivity and specificity greater than 90%. CONCLUSION: oVEMP amplitudes are superior to cVEMP thresholds in the diagnosis of SCDS.

KW - Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential

KW - Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential

KW - Superior canal dehiscence

KW - Tone bursts

KW - Vestibular

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871969123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871969123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31827136b0

DO - 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31827136b0

M3 - Article

C2 - 23183641

AN - SCOPUS:84871969123

VL - 34

SP - 121

EP - 126

JO - Otology and Neurotology

JF - Otology and Neurotology

SN - 1531-7129

IS - 1

ER -