Occupational-specific strength predicts astronaut-related task performance in a weighted suit

Andrew J.D. Taylor, Christopher J. Kotarsky, Colin W. Bond, Kyle J. Hackney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Future space missions beyond low Earth orbit will require deconditioned astronauts to perform occupationally relevant tasks within a planetary spacesuit. The prediction of time-to-completion (TTC) of astronaut tasks will be critical for crew safety, autonomous operations, and mission success. This exploratory study determined if the addition of task-specific strength testing to current standard lower body testing would enhance the prediction of TTC in a 1-G test battery. METHODS: Eight healthy participants completed NASA lower body strength tests, occupationally specific strength tests, and performed six task simulations (hand drilling, construction wrenching, incline walking, collecting weighted samples, and dragging an unresponsive crewmember to safety) in a 48-kg weighted suit. The TTC for each task was recorded and summed to obtain a total TTC for the test battery. Linear regression was used to predict total TTC with two models: 1) NASA lower body strength tests; and 2) NASA lower body strength tests + occupationally specific strength tests. RESULTS: Total TTC of the test battery ranged from 20.2-44.5 min. The lower body strength test alone accounted for 61% of the variability in total TTC. The addition of hand drilling and wrenching strength tests accounted for 99% of the variability in total TTC. DISCUSSION: Adding occupationally specific strength tests (hand drilling and wrenching) to standard lower body strength tests successfully predicted total TTC in a performance test battery within a weighted suit. Future research should couple these strength tests with higher fidelity task simulations to determine the utility and efficacy of task performance prediction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)58-62
Number of pages5
JournalAerospace Medicine and Human Performance
Volume89
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Astronauts
Task Performance and Analysis
United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Space Suits
Hand
Safety
Hand Strength
Orbit
Walking
Linear Models
Healthy Volunteers

Keywords

  • Astronaut task performance
  • Exercise countermeasures
  • Strength to body weight ratio

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Occupational-specific strength predicts astronaut-related task performance in a weighted suit. / Taylor, Andrew J.D.; Kotarsky, Christopher J.; Bond, Colin W.; Hackney, Kyle J.

In: Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance, Vol. 89, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 58-62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Taylor, Andrew J.D. ; Kotarsky, Christopher J. ; Bond, Colin W. ; Hackney, Kyle J. / Occupational-specific strength predicts astronaut-related task performance in a weighted suit. In: Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance. 2018 ; Vol. 89, No. 1. pp. 58-62.
@article{d06d912b618b42da804576855857562c,
title = "Occupational-specific strength predicts astronaut-related task performance in a weighted suit",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Future space missions beyond low Earth orbit will require deconditioned astronauts to perform occupationally relevant tasks within a planetary spacesuit. The prediction of time-to-completion (TTC) of astronaut tasks will be critical for crew safety, autonomous operations, and mission success. This exploratory study determined if the addition of task-specific strength testing to current standard lower body testing would enhance the prediction of TTC in a 1-G test battery. METHODS: Eight healthy participants completed NASA lower body strength tests, occupationally specific strength tests, and performed six task simulations (hand drilling, construction wrenching, incline walking, collecting weighted samples, and dragging an unresponsive crewmember to safety) in a 48-kg weighted suit. The TTC for each task was recorded and summed to obtain a total TTC for the test battery. Linear regression was used to predict total TTC with two models: 1) NASA lower body strength tests; and 2) NASA lower body strength tests + occupationally specific strength tests. RESULTS: Total TTC of the test battery ranged from 20.2-44.5 min. The lower body strength test alone accounted for 61{\%} of the variability in total TTC. The addition of hand drilling and wrenching strength tests accounted for 99{\%} of the variability in total TTC. DISCUSSION: Adding occupationally specific strength tests (hand drilling and wrenching) to standard lower body strength tests successfully predicted total TTC in a performance test battery within a weighted suit. Future research should couple these strength tests with higher fidelity task simulations to determine the utility and efficacy of task performance prediction.",
keywords = "Astronaut task performance, Exercise countermeasures, Strength to body weight ratio",
author = "Taylor, {Andrew J.D.} and Kotarsky, {Christopher J.} and Bond, {Colin W.} and Hackney, {Kyle J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3357/AMHP.4961.2018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
pages = "58--62",
journal = "Aerospace medicine and human performance",
issn = "2375-6314",
publisher = "Aerospace Medical Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Occupational-specific strength predicts astronaut-related task performance in a weighted suit

AU - Taylor, Andrew J.D.

AU - Kotarsky, Christopher J.

AU - Bond, Colin W.

AU - Hackney, Kyle J.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Future space missions beyond low Earth orbit will require deconditioned astronauts to perform occupationally relevant tasks within a planetary spacesuit. The prediction of time-to-completion (TTC) of astronaut tasks will be critical for crew safety, autonomous operations, and mission success. This exploratory study determined if the addition of task-specific strength testing to current standard lower body testing would enhance the prediction of TTC in a 1-G test battery. METHODS: Eight healthy participants completed NASA lower body strength tests, occupationally specific strength tests, and performed six task simulations (hand drilling, construction wrenching, incline walking, collecting weighted samples, and dragging an unresponsive crewmember to safety) in a 48-kg weighted suit. The TTC for each task was recorded and summed to obtain a total TTC for the test battery. Linear regression was used to predict total TTC with two models: 1) NASA lower body strength tests; and 2) NASA lower body strength tests + occupationally specific strength tests. RESULTS: Total TTC of the test battery ranged from 20.2-44.5 min. The lower body strength test alone accounted for 61% of the variability in total TTC. The addition of hand drilling and wrenching strength tests accounted for 99% of the variability in total TTC. DISCUSSION: Adding occupationally specific strength tests (hand drilling and wrenching) to standard lower body strength tests successfully predicted total TTC in a performance test battery within a weighted suit. Future research should couple these strength tests with higher fidelity task simulations to determine the utility and efficacy of task performance prediction.

AB - BACKGROUND: Future space missions beyond low Earth orbit will require deconditioned astronauts to perform occupationally relevant tasks within a planetary spacesuit. The prediction of time-to-completion (TTC) of astronaut tasks will be critical for crew safety, autonomous operations, and mission success. This exploratory study determined if the addition of task-specific strength testing to current standard lower body testing would enhance the prediction of TTC in a 1-G test battery. METHODS: Eight healthy participants completed NASA lower body strength tests, occupationally specific strength tests, and performed six task simulations (hand drilling, construction wrenching, incline walking, collecting weighted samples, and dragging an unresponsive crewmember to safety) in a 48-kg weighted suit. The TTC for each task was recorded and summed to obtain a total TTC for the test battery. Linear regression was used to predict total TTC with two models: 1) NASA lower body strength tests; and 2) NASA lower body strength tests + occupationally specific strength tests. RESULTS: Total TTC of the test battery ranged from 20.2-44.5 min. The lower body strength test alone accounted for 61% of the variability in total TTC. The addition of hand drilling and wrenching strength tests accounted for 99% of the variability in total TTC. DISCUSSION: Adding occupationally specific strength tests (hand drilling and wrenching) to standard lower body strength tests successfully predicted total TTC in a performance test battery within a weighted suit. Future research should couple these strength tests with higher fidelity task simulations to determine the utility and efficacy of task performance prediction.

KW - Astronaut task performance

KW - Exercise countermeasures

KW - Strength to body weight ratio

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037743917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85037743917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3357/AMHP.4961.2018

DO - 10.3357/AMHP.4961.2018

M3 - Article

C2 - 29233245

AN - SCOPUS:85037743917

VL - 89

SP - 58

EP - 62

JO - Aerospace medicine and human performance

JF - Aerospace medicine and human performance

SN - 2375-6314

IS - 1

ER -