Nurse safety: How is safety climate related to affect and attitude?

Ashley E. Nixon, Julie J. Lanz, Archana Manapragada, Valentina Bruk-Lee, April Schantz, Jose F. Rodriguez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Occupational accidents and injuries continue to be a critical concern for nurses, given the hazardous healthcare environment. This study advances the research on workplace safety by studying the process variables (i.e. job-related negative affect (JRNA) and job satisfaction) in explaining the relationship between safety climate and various safety criteria in nurses. Based on survey data from 326 nurses, our findings suggest that psychological safety climate is negatively related to JRNA, turnover intentions, safety workarounds, and workplace hazards. In addition, structural equation modelling indicated general support for a model in which psychological safety climate influences employee strain through job attitudes, including JRNA and job satisfaction. More specifically, job attitudes were found to mediate the relationship between psychological safety climate and turnover intentions, experience of hazards, and injuries. Safety workarounds did not significantly relate to injuries. The present study contributes to the ongoing improvement of interventions aimed at mitigating nurses’ injuries by integrating job attitudes into the safety climate–safety outcome framework.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)401-419
Number of pages19
JournalWork and Stress
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2 2015

Fingerprint

Climate
Nurses
Safety
Job Satisfaction
Psychology
Workplace
Wounds and Injuries
Occupational Injuries
Occupational Accidents
Delivery of Health Care
Research

Keywords

  • Psychological safety climate
  • hazards
  • injuries
  • job attitudes
  • nurses
  • safety workarounds

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Nixon, A. E., Lanz, J. J., Manapragada, A., Bruk-Lee, V., Schantz, A., & Rodriguez, J. F. (2015). Nurse safety: How is safety climate related to affect and attitude? Work and Stress, 29(4), 401-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2015.1076536

Nurse safety : How is safety climate related to affect and attitude? / Nixon, Ashley E.; Lanz, Julie J.; Manapragada, Archana; Bruk-Lee, Valentina; Schantz, April; Rodriguez, Jose F.

In: Work and Stress, Vol. 29, No. 4, 02.10.2015, p. 401-419.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nixon, AE, Lanz, JJ, Manapragada, A, Bruk-Lee, V, Schantz, A & Rodriguez, JF 2015, 'Nurse safety: How is safety climate related to affect and attitude?', Work and Stress, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 401-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2015.1076536
Nixon AE, Lanz JJ, Manapragada A, Bruk-Lee V, Schantz A, Rodriguez JF. Nurse safety: How is safety climate related to affect and attitude? Work and Stress. 2015 Oct 2;29(4):401-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2015.1076536
Nixon, Ashley E. ; Lanz, Julie J. ; Manapragada, Archana ; Bruk-Lee, Valentina ; Schantz, April ; Rodriguez, Jose F. / Nurse safety : How is safety climate related to affect and attitude?. In: Work and Stress. 2015 ; Vol. 29, No. 4. pp. 401-419.
@article{545846b92a544cab999c7936f48d1a42,
title = "Nurse safety: How is safety climate related to affect and attitude?",
abstract = "Occupational accidents and injuries continue to be a critical concern for nurses, given the hazardous healthcare environment. This study advances the research on workplace safety by studying the process variables (i.e. job-related negative affect (JRNA) and job satisfaction) in explaining the relationship between safety climate and various safety criteria in nurses. Based on survey data from 326 nurses, our findings suggest that psychological safety climate is negatively related to JRNA, turnover intentions, safety workarounds, and workplace hazards. In addition, structural equation modelling indicated general support for a model in which psychological safety climate influences employee strain through job attitudes, including JRNA and job satisfaction. More specifically, job attitudes were found to mediate the relationship between psychological safety climate and turnover intentions, experience of hazards, and injuries. Safety workarounds did not significantly relate to injuries. The present study contributes to the ongoing improvement of interventions aimed at mitigating nurses’ injuries by integrating job attitudes into the safety climate–safety outcome framework.",
keywords = "Psychological safety climate, hazards, injuries, job attitudes, nurses, safety workarounds",
author = "Nixon, {Ashley E.} and Lanz, {Julie J.} and Archana Manapragada and Valentina Bruk-Lee and April Schantz and Rodriguez, {Jose F.}",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/02678373.2015.1076536",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "401--419",
journal = "Work and Stress",
issn = "0267-8373",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nurse safety

T2 - How is safety climate related to affect and attitude?

AU - Nixon, Ashley E.

AU - Lanz, Julie J.

AU - Manapragada, Archana

AU - Bruk-Lee, Valentina

AU - Schantz, April

AU - Rodriguez, Jose F.

PY - 2015/10/2

Y1 - 2015/10/2

N2 - Occupational accidents and injuries continue to be a critical concern for nurses, given the hazardous healthcare environment. This study advances the research on workplace safety by studying the process variables (i.e. job-related negative affect (JRNA) and job satisfaction) in explaining the relationship between safety climate and various safety criteria in nurses. Based on survey data from 326 nurses, our findings suggest that psychological safety climate is negatively related to JRNA, turnover intentions, safety workarounds, and workplace hazards. In addition, structural equation modelling indicated general support for a model in which psychological safety climate influences employee strain through job attitudes, including JRNA and job satisfaction. More specifically, job attitudes were found to mediate the relationship between psychological safety climate and turnover intentions, experience of hazards, and injuries. Safety workarounds did not significantly relate to injuries. The present study contributes to the ongoing improvement of interventions aimed at mitigating nurses’ injuries by integrating job attitudes into the safety climate–safety outcome framework.

AB - Occupational accidents and injuries continue to be a critical concern for nurses, given the hazardous healthcare environment. This study advances the research on workplace safety by studying the process variables (i.e. job-related negative affect (JRNA) and job satisfaction) in explaining the relationship between safety climate and various safety criteria in nurses. Based on survey data from 326 nurses, our findings suggest that psychological safety climate is negatively related to JRNA, turnover intentions, safety workarounds, and workplace hazards. In addition, structural equation modelling indicated general support for a model in which psychological safety climate influences employee strain through job attitudes, including JRNA and job satisfaction. More specifically, job attitudes were found to mediate the relationship between psychological safety climate and turnover intentions, experience of hazards, and injuries. Safety workarounds did not significantly relate to injuries. The present study contributes to the ongoing improvement of interventions aimed at mitigating nurses’ injuries by integrating job attitudes into the safety climate–safety outcome framework.

KW - Psychological safety climate

KW - hazards

KW - injuries

KW - job attitudes

KW - nurses

KW - safety workarounds

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947025255&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947025255&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02678373.2015.1076536

DO - 10.1080/02678373.2015.1076536

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84947025255

VL - 29

SP - 401

EP - 419

JO - Work and Stress

JF - Work and Stress

SN - 0267-8373

IS - 4

ER -