(-)-Nornicotine partially substitutes for (+)-amphetamine in a drug discrimination paradigm in rats

M. T. Bardo, Rick A Bevins, J. E. Klebaur, P. A. Crooks, L. P. Dwoskin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rats were trained in a two-lever food-reinforced operant task to discriminate (+)-amphetamine (1 mg/kg) from saline. After discrimination training stabilized, test doses of (+)-amphetamine (0.0625-2.0 mg/kg), (-)-nicotine (0.1-1.0 mg/kg), or (-)-nornicotine (1-10 mg/kg) were assessed for their ability to substitute for the (+)-amphetamine training dose during brief test sessions in which food reinforcement was withheld. As expected, as the test dose of (+)-amphetamine increased, there was a dose-related increase in drug-appropriate responding, with both 1 and 2 mg/kg test doses substituting fully for the (+)-amphetamine training dose. Both (-)-nicotine and (-)-nornicotine showed partial substitution (approximately 50% drug-appropriate responding) for the (+)-amphetamine training dose, with (-)-nicotine being more potent than (-)-nornicotine. Rate suppressant effects prevented the assessment of higher doses of (-)-nicotine or (-)-nornicotine. Thus, while (-)-nicotine and (-)-nornicotine share similar discriminative stimulus properties, the mechanism that mediates this effect appears to differ, at least in part, from that activated by (+)-amphetamine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1083-1087
Number of pages5
JournalPharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Volume58
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 1997

Fingerprint

nornicotine
Amphetamine
Rats
Nicotine
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Food

Keywords

  • Amphetamine
  • Discrimination stimulus
  • Drug cue
  • Drug discrimination
  • Nicotine
  • Nornicotine
  • Rat

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Toxicology
  • Pharmacology
  • Clinical Biochemistry
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

(-)-Nornicotine partially substitutes for (+)-amphetamine in a drug discrimination paradigm in rats. / Bardo, M. T.; Bevins, Rick A; Klebaur, J. E.; Crooks, P. A.; Dwoskin, L. P.

In: Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, Vol. 58, No. 4, 01.12.1997, p. 1083-1087.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bardo, M. T. ; Bevins, Rick A ; Klebaur, J. E. ; Crooks, P. A. ; Dwoskin, L. P. / (-)-Nornicotine partially substitutes for (+)-amphetamine in a drug discrimination paradigm in rats. In: Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 1997 ; Vol. 58, No. 4. pp. 1083-1087.
@article{8bfc62478bd3408ab056afd4552af2db,
title = "(-)-Nornicotine partially substitutes for (+)-amphetamine in a drug discrimination paradigm in rats",
abstract = "Rats were trained in a two-lever food-reinforced operant task to discriminate (+)-amphetamine (1 mg/kg) from saline. After discrimination training stabilized, test doses of (+)-amphetamine (0.0625-2.0 mg/kg), (-)-nicotine (0.1-1.0 mg/kg), or (-)-nornicotine (1-10 mg/kg) were assessed for their ability to substitute for the (+)-amphetamine training dose during brief test sessions in which food reinforcement was withheld. As expected, as the test dose of (+)-amphetamine increased, there was a dose-related increase in drug-appropriate responding, with both 1 and 2 mg/kg test doses substituting fully for the (+)-amphetamine training dose. Both (-)-nicotine and (-)-nornicotine showed partial substitution (approximately 50{\%} drug-appropriate responding) for the (+)-amphetamine training dose, with (-)-nicotine being more potent than (-)-nornicotine. Rate suppressant effects prevented the assessment of higher doses of (-)-nicotine or (-)-nornicotine. Thus, while (-)-nicotine and (-)-nornicotine share similar discriminative stimulus properties, the mechanism that mediates this effect appears to differ, at least in part, from that activated by (+)-amphetamine.",
keywords = "Amphetamine, Discrimination stimulus, Drug cue, Drug discrimination, Nicotine, Nornicotine, Rat",
author = "Bardo, {M. T.} and Bevins, {Rick A} and Klebaur, {J. E.} and Crooks, {P. A.} and Dwoskin, {L. P.}",
year = "1997",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0091-3057(97)00303-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "1083--1087",
journal = "Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior",
issn = "0091-3057",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - (-)-Nornicotine partially substitutes for (+)-amphetamine in a drug discrimination paradigm in rats

AU - Bardo, M. T.

AU - Bevins, Rick A

AU - Klebaur, J. E.

AU - Crooks, P. A.

AU - Dwoskin, L. P.

PY - 1997/12/1

Y1 - 1997/12/1

N2 - Rats were trained in a two-lever food-reinforced operant task to discriminate (+)-amphetamine (1 mg/kg) from saline. After discrimination training stabilized, test doses of (+)-amphetamine (0.0625-2.0 mg/kg), (-)-nicotine (0.1-1.0 mg/kg), or (-)-nornicotine (1-10 mg/kg) were assessed for their ability to substitute for the (+)-amphetamine training dose during brief test sessions in which food reinforcement was withheld. As expected, as the test dose of (+)-amphetamine increased, there was a dose-related increase in drug-appropriate responding, with both 1 and 2 mg/kg test doses substituting fully for the (+)-amphetamine training dose. Both (-)-nicotine and (-)-nornicotine showed partial substitution (approximately 50% drug-appropriate responding) for the (+)-amphetamine training dose, with (-)-nicotine being more potent than (-)-nornicotine. Rate suppressant effects prevented the assessment of higher doses of (-)-nicotine or (-)-nornicotine. Thus, while (-)-nicotine and (-)-nornicotine share similar discriminative stimulus properties, the mechanism that mediates this effect appears to differ, at least in part, from that activated by (+)-amphetamine.

AB - Rats were trained in a two-lever food-reinforced operant task to discriminate (+)-amphetamine (1 mg/kg) from saline. After discrimination training stabilized, test doses of (+)-amphetamine (0.0625-2.0 mg/kg), (-)-nicotine (0.1-1.0 mg/kg), or (-)-nornicotine (1-10 mg/kg) were assessed for their ability to substitute for the (+)-amphetamine training dose during brief test sessions in which food reinforcement was withheld. As expected, as the test dose of (+)-amphetamine increased, there was a dose-related increase in drug-appropriate responding, with both 1 and 2 mg/kg test doses substituting fully for the (+)-amphetamine training dose. Both (-)-nicotine and (-)-nornicotine showed partial substitution (approximately 50% drug-appropriate responding) for the (+)-amphetamine training dose, with (-)-nicotine being more potent than (-)-nornicotine. Rate suppressant effects prevented the assessment of higher doses of (-)-nicotine or (-)-nornicotine. Thus, while (-)-nicotine and (-)-nornicotine share similar discriminative stimulus properties, the mechanism that mediates this effect appears to differ, at least in part, from that activated by (+)-amphetamine.

KW - Amphetamine

KW - Discrimination stimulus

KW - Drug cue

KW - Drug discrimination

KW - Nicotine

KW - Nornicotine

KW - Rat

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031425153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031425153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0091-3057(97)00303-1

DO - 10.1016/S0091-3057(97)00303-1

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 1083

EP - 1087

JO - Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

JF - Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

SN - 0091-3057

IS - 4

ER -