Non-suicidal self-injury and bulimia: the role of emotion dysregulation and body dissatisfaction

Lindsey Hovrud, Raluca Simons, Jeffrey Simons, John Korkow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Risk factors of negative affect, body dissatisfaction, distress tolerance, and negative urgency are independently associated with bulimia symptoms and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). However, relationships of these risk factors within comorbid presentations are not fully understood. The current study examined specific roles of these risk factors within this relationship. Methods: An at-risk community sample of young adults (N = 429) completed an online survey of negative affect, body dissatisfaction, distress tolerance, negative urgency, bulimia symptoms, and NSSI. Results: A hypothesized path model was a good fit to the data. Results indicated direct paths from body dissatisfaction, negative urgency, and distress tolerance to bulimia symptoms. Negative urgency, distress tolerance, and bulimia symptoms were directly associated with NSSI. Consistent with hypotheses, distress tolerance and negative urgency acted as vulnerability factors, increasing the strength of associations between bulimia symptoms and NSSI. Distress tolerance also strengthened associations between negative urgency and NSSI. In addition to the direct effect, negative urgency was indirectly associated with NSSI via body dissatisfaction bulimia. Hypothesized indirect effects through distress tolerance were not supported. Conclusions: Results support etiological models of bulimia and NSSI, and suggest deficits in emotion regulation strengthen risk of comorbid presentations. Furthermore, individuals with greater impulsivity and difficulty tolerating distress are at increased risk of engaging in both bulimia behaviors and NSSI, providing targets for clinical intervention. Level of evidence: Level V, cross-sectional descriptive study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEating and Weight Disorders
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Bulimia
Emotions
Wounds and Injuries
Impulsive Behavior
Young Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • Body dissatisfaction
  • Bulimia
  • Distress tolerance
  • Emotion dysregulation
  • Negative urgency
  • Non-suicidal self-injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Non-suicidal self-injury and bulimia : the role of emotion dysregulation and body dissatisfaction. / Hovrud, Lindsey; Simons, Raluca; Simons, Jeffrey; Korkow, John.

In: Eating and Weight Disorders, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4496a203ae9c43c0ba1da02933544df8,
title = "Non-suicidal self-injury and bulimia: the role of emotion dysregulation and body dissatisfaction",
abstract = "Purpose: Risk factors of negative affect, body dissatisfaction, distress tolerance, and negative urgency are independently associated with bulimia symptoms and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). However, relationships of these risk factors within comorbid presentations are not fully understood. The current study examined specific roles of these risk factors within this relationship. Methods: An at-risk community sample of young adults (N = 429) completed an online survey of negative affect, body dissatisfaction, distress tolerance, negative urgency, bulimia symptoms, and NSSI. Results: A hypothesized path model was a good fit to the data. Results indicated direct paths from body dissatisfaction, negative urgency, and distress tolerance to bulimia symptoms. Negative urgency, distress tolerance, and bulimia symptoms were directly associated with NSSI. Consistent with hypotheses, distress tolerance and negative urgency acted as vulnerability factors, increasing the strength of associations between bulimia symptoms and NSSI. Distress tolerance also strengthened associations between negative urgency and NSSI. In addition to the direct effect, negative urgency was indirectly associated with NSSI via body dissatisfaction bulimia. Hypothesized indirect effects through distress tolerance were not supported. Conclusions: Results support etiological models of bulimia and NSSI, and suggest deficits in emotion regulation strengthen risk of comorbid presentations. Furthermore, individuals with greater impulsivity and difficulty tolerating distress are at increased risk of engaging in both bulimia behaviors and NSSI, providing targets for clinical intervention. Level of evidence: Level V, cross-sectional descriptive study.",
keywords = "Body dissatisfaction, Bulimia, Distress tolerance, Emotion dysregulation, Negative urgency, Non-suicidal self-injury",
author = "Lindsey Hovrud and Raluca Simons and Jeffrey Simons and John Korkow",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s40519-019-00741-5",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Eating and Weight Disorders",
issn = "1124-4909",
publisher = "Editrice Kurtis s.r.l.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-suicidal self-injury and bulimia

T2 - the role of emotion dysregulation and body dissatisfaction

AU - Hovrud, Lindsey

AU - Simons, Raluca

AU - Simons, Jeffrey

AU - Korkow, John

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Purpose: Risk factors of negative affect, body dissatisfaction, distress tolerance, and negative urgency are independently associated with bulimia symptoms and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). However, relationships of these risk factors within comorbid presentations are not fully understood. The current study examined specific roles of these risk factors within this relationship. Methods: An at-risk community sample of young adults (N = 429) completed an online survey of negative affect, body dissatisfaction, distress tolerance, negative urgency, bulimia symptoms, and NSSI. Results: A hypothesized path model was a good fit to the data. Results indicated direct paths from body dissatisfaction, negative urgency, and distress tolerance to bulimia symptoms. Negative urgency, distress tolerance, and bulimia symptoms were directly associated with NSSI. Consistent with hypotheses, distress tolerance and negative urgency acted as vulnerability factors, increasing the strength of associations between bulimia symptoms and NSSI. Distress tolerance also strengthened associations between negative urgency and NSSI. In addition to the direct effect, negative urgency was indirectly associated with NSSI via body dissatisfaction bulimia. Hypothesized indirect effects through distress tolerance were not supported. Conclusions: Results support etiological models of bulimia and NSSI, and suggest deficits in emotion regulation strengthen risk of comorbid presentations. Furthermore, individuals with greater impulsivity and difficulty tolerating distress are at increased risk of engaging in both bulimia behaviors and NSSI, providing targets for clinical intervention. Level of evidence: Level V, cross-sectional descriptive study.

AB - Purpose: Risk factors of negative affect, body dissatisfaction, distress tolerance, and negative urgency are independently associated with bulimia symptoms and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). However, relationships of these risk factors within comorbid presentations are not fully understood. The current study examined specific roles of these risk factors within this relationship. Methods: An at-risk community sample of young adults (N = 429) completed an online survey of negative affect, body dissatisfaction, distress tolerance, negative urgency, bulimia symptoms, and NSSI. Results: A hypothesized path model was a good fit to the data. Results indicated direct paths from body dissatisfaction, negative urgency, and distress tolerance to bulimia symptoms. Negative urgency, distress tolerance, and bulimia symptoms were directly associated with NSSI. Consistent with hypotheses, distress tolerance and negative urgency acted as vulnerability factors, increasing the strength of associations between bulimia symptoms and NSSI. Distress tolerance also strengthened associations between negative urgency and NSSI. In addition to the direct effect, negative urgency was indirectly associated with NSSI via body dissatisfaction bulimia. Hypothesized indirect effects through distress tolerance were not supported. Conclusions: Results support etiological models of bulimia and NSSI, and suggest deficits in emotion regulation strengthen risk of comorbid presentations. Furthermore, individuals with greater impulsivity and difficulty tolerating distress are at increased risk of engaging in both bulimia behaviors and NSSI, providing targets for clinical intervention. Level of evidence: Level V, cross-sectional descriptive study.

KW - Body dissatisfaction

KW - Bulimia

KW - Distress tolerance

KW - Emotion dysregulation

KW - Negative urgency

KW - Non-suicidal self-injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068843406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068843406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s40519-019-00741-5

DO - 10.1007/s40519-019-00741-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 31292855

AN - SCOPUS:85068843406

JO - Eating and Weight Disorders

JF - Eating and Weight Disorders

SN - 1124-4909

ER -