Non-coplanar automatic beam orientation selection in cranial IMRT: A practical methodology

Jorge Llacer, Sicong Li, Nzhde Agazaryan, Claus Promberger, Timothy D. Solberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper proposes a method for automatic selection of beam orientations in non-coplanar cranial IMRT. Methods of computer vision, beam's eye view techniques and neural networks are used to define a new geometry-based methodology that leads to treatment plans for cranial lesions that are comparable in quality to those generated by experienced radiation physicists. The automatic beam selection (ABS) process can be carried out in clinically useful computation times, in 1 min or less for most cases. In the process of describing the ABS process, it is shown that the cranial beam orientation optimization problem is mathematically ill posed, with the expectation that a large number of solutions will lead to similar results. Nevertheless, there are better and worse solutions and we show that the proposed ABS process, by its design, has to lead to one of the better ones. We have carried out extensive tests with 14 patients with beam selection tasks ranging from the rather simple to quite complex. The ABS process has always yielded optimizations with results that are considered good for clinic use. Seven-beam coplanar optimizations for some of the patients have also been investigated. Comparisons with non-coplanar optimizations indicate in which cases the simpler coplanar plans can be used to advantage. Parameters used in the comparisons are dose-volume histograms, minimum and maximum PTV doses, equivalent uniform doses for the PTV and OARs, and treatment volume, conformity and normal tissue indices. It is felt that the current ABS methodology is ready for extensive clinical tests.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1337-1368
Number of pages32
JournalPhysics in medicine and biology
Volume54
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 8 2009

Fingerprint

Radiation
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Non-coplanar automatic beam orientation selection in cranial IMRT : A practical methodology. / Llacer, Jorge; Li, Sicong; Agazaryan, Nzhde; Promberger, Claus; Solberg, Timothy D.

In: Physics in medicine and biology, Vol. 54, No. 5, 08.04.2009, p. 1337-1368.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Llacer, Jorge ; Li, Sicong ; Agazaryan, Nzhde ; Promberger, Claus ; Solberg, Timothy D. / Non-coplanar automatic beam orientation selection in cranial IMRT : A practical methodology. In: Physics in medicine and biology. 2009 ; Vol. 54, No. 5. pp. 1337-1368.
@article{b17ddb446f0e473e9e673bc373276bbf,
title = "Non-coplanar automatic beam orientation selection in cranial IMRT: A practical methodology",
abstract = "This paper proposes a method for automatic selection of beam orientations in non-coplanar cranial IMRT. Methods of computer vision, beam's eye view techniques and neural networks are used to define a new geometry-based methodology that leads to treatment plans for cranial lesions that are comparable in quality to those generated by experienced radiation physicists. The automatic beam selection (ABS) process can be carried out in clinically useful computation times, in 1 min or less for most cases. In the process of describing the ABS process, it is shown that the cranial beam orientation optimization problem is mathematically ill posed, with the expectation that a large number of solutions will lead to similar results. Nevertheless, there are better and worse solutions and we show that the proposed ABS process, by its design, has to lead to one of the better ones. We have carried out extensive tests with 14 patients with beam selection tasks ranging from the rather simple to quite complex. The ABS process has always yielded optimizations with results that are considered good for clinic use. Seven-beam coplanar optimizations for some of the patients have also been investigated. Comparisons with non-coplanar optimizations indicate in which cases the simpler coplanar plans can be used to advantage. Parameters used in the comparisons are dose-volume histograms, minimum and maximum PTV doses, equivalent uniform doses for the PTV and OARs, and treatment volume, conformity and normal tissue indices. It is felt that the current ABS methodology is ready for extensive clinical tests.",
author = "Jorge Llacer and Sicong Li and Nzhde Agazaryan and Claus Promberger and Solberg, {Timothy D.}",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1088/0031-9155/54/5/016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "1337--1368",
journal = "Physics in Medicine and Biology",
issn = "0031-9155",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-coplanar automatic beam orientation selection in cranial IMRT

T2 - A practical methodology

AU - Llacer, Jorge

AU - Li, Sicong

AU - Agazaryan, Nzhde

AU - Promberger, Claus

AU - Solberg, Timothy D.

PY - 2009/4/8

Y1 - 2009/4/8

N2 - This paper proposes a method for automatic selection of beam orientations in non-coplanar cranial IMRT. Methods of computer vision, beam's eye view techniques and neural networks are used to define a new geometry-based methodology that leads to treatment plans for cranial lesions that are comparable in quality to those generated by experienced radiation physicists. The automatic beam selection (ABS) process can be carried out in clinically useful computation times, in 1 min or less for most cases. In the process of describing the ABS process, it is shown that the cranial beam orientation optimization problem is mathematically ill posed, with the expectation that a large number of solutions will lead to similar results. Nevertheless, there are better and worse solutions and we show that the proposed ABS process, by its design, has to lead to one of the better ones. We have carried out extensive tests with 14 patients with beam selection tasks ranging from the rather simple to quite complex. The ABS process has always yielded optimizations with results that are considered good for clinic use. Seven-beam coplanar optimizations for some of the patients have also been investigated. Comparisons with non-coplanar optimizations indicate in which cases the simpler coplanar plans can be used to advantage. Parameters used in the comparisons are dose-volume histograms, minimum and maximum PTV doses, equivalent uniform doses for the PTV and OARs, and treatment volume, conformity and normal tissue indices. It is felt that the current ABS methodology is ready for extensive clinical tests.

AB - This paper proposes a method for automatic selection of beam orientations in non-coplanar cranial IMRT. Methods of computer vision, beam's eye view techniques and neural networks are used to define a new geometry-based methodology that leads to treatment plans for cranial lesions that are comparable in quality to those generated by experienced radiation physicists. The automatic beam selection (ABS) process can be carried out in clinically useful computation times, in 1 min or less for most cases. In the process of describing the ABS process, it is shown that the cranial beam orientation optimization problem is mathematically ill posed, with the expectation that a large number of solutions will lead to similar results. Nevertheless, there are better and worse solutions and we show that the proposed ABS process, by its design, has to lead to one of the better ones. We have carried out extensive tests with 14 patients with beam selection tasks ranging from the rather simple to quite complex. The ABS process has always yielded optimizations with results that are considered good for clinic use. Seven-beam coplanar optimizations for some of the patients have also been investigated. Comparisons with non-coplanar optimizations indicate in which cases the simpler coplanar plans can be used to advantage. Parameters used in the comparisons are dose-volume histograms, minimum and maximum PTV doses, equivalent uniform doses for the PTV and OARs, and treatment volume, conformity and normal tissue indices. It is felt that the current ABS methodology is ready for extensive clinical tests.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=63649128442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=63649128442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/0031-9155/54/5/016

DO - 10.1088/0031-9155/54/5/016

M3 - Article

C2 - 19204383

AN - SCOPUS:63649128442

VL - 54

SP - 1337

EP - 1368

JO - Physics in Medicine and Biology

JF - Physics in Medicine and Biology

SN - 0031-9155

IS - 5

ER -