Nicotine trained as a negative feature passes the retardation-of- acquisition and summation tests of a conditioned inhibitor

Jennifer E. Murray, Andrew W. Walker, Chia Li, Nicole R. Wells, Rachel D. Penrod, Rick A Bevins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Nicotine functions as a negative feature in a Pavlovian discriminated goal-tracking task. Whether withholding of responding to the conditional stimulus (CS) reflects nicotine functioning as a conditioned inhibitor is unknown. Accordingly, the present research sought to determine whether nicotine trained as a negative feature passed the retardation-of-acquisition and summation tests, thus characterizing it as a pharmacological (interoceptive) conditioned inhibitor. In the retardation test, rats received either nicotine (0.4 mg/kg) or chlordiazepoxide (5 mg/kg) negative feature training in which the drug state signaled when a 15-sec light CS would not be paired with sucrose; light was paired with sucrose on intermixed saline sessions. Following acquisition of the discrimination, both groups received nicotine CS training in which sucrose was intermittently available on nicotine but not intermixed saline sessions. Acquisition of conditioned responding to the nicotine CS was slower in the nicotine negative feature group than in the chlordiazepoxide negative feature group. In the summation test, rats were assigned to either the nicotine negative feature group or a pseudoconditioning control. In this control, the light CS was paired with sucrose on half the nicotine and half the saline sessions. Both groups also received excitatory training in which a white noise CS was paired with sucrose. The summation test consisted of presenting the white noise in conjunction with nicotine. Conditioned responding evoked by the white noise was decreased in the negative feature but not the pseudoconditioning group. Combined, the results provide the first evidence that an interoceptive stimulus (nicotine) can become a conditioned inhibitor.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)452-458
Number of pages7
JournalLearning and Memory
Volume18
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2011

Fingerprint

Nicotine
Sucrose
Chlordiazepoxide
Light
Pharmacology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Cite this

Nicotine trained as a negative feature passes the retardation-of- acquisition and summation tests of a conditioned inhibitor. / Murray, Jennifer E.; Walker, Andrew W.; Li, Chia; Wells, Nicole R.; Penrod, Rachel D.; Bevins, Rick A.

In: Learning and Memory, Vol. 18, No. 7, 01.07.2011, p. 452-458.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Murray, Jennifer E. ; Walker, Andrew W. ; Li, Chia ; Wells, Nicole R. ; Penrod, Rachel D. ; Bevins, Rick A. / Nicotine trained as a negative feature passes the retardation-of- acquisition and summation tests of a conditioned inhibitor. In: Learning and Memory. 2011 ; Vol. 18, No. 7. pp. 452-458.
@article{45bec7dab3c14c409a85cedd8881e98d,
title = "Nicotine trained as a negative feature passes the retardation-of- acquisition and summation tests of a conditioned inhibitor",
abstract = "Nicotine functions as a negative feature in a Pavlovian discriminated goal-tracking task. Whether withholding of responding to the conditional stimulus (CS) reflects nicotine functioning as a conditioned inhibitor is unknown. Accordingly, the present research sought to determine whether nicotine trained as a negative feature passed the retardation-of-acquisition and summation tests, thus characterizing it as a pharmacological (interoceptive) conditioned inhibitor. In the retardation test, rats received either nicotine (0.4 mg/kg) or chlordiazepoxide (5 mg/kg) negative feature training in which the drug state signaled when a 15-sec light CS would not be paired with sucrose; light was paired with sucrose on intermixed saline sessions. Following acquisition of the discrimination, both groups received nicotine CS training in which sucrose was intermittently available on nicotine but not intermixed saline sessions. Acquisition of conditioned responding to the nicotine CS was slower in the nicotine negative feature group than in the chlordiazepoxide negative feature group. In the summation test, rats were assigned to either the nicotine negative feature group or a pseudoconditioning control. In this control, the light CS was paired with sucrose on half the nicotine and half the saline sessions. Both groups also received excitatory training in which a white noise CS was paired with sucrose. The summation test consisted of presenting the white noise in conjunction with nicotine. Conditioned responding evoked by the white noise was decreased in the negative feature but not the pseudoconditioning group. Combined, the results provide the first evidence that an interoceptive stimulus (nicotine) can become a conditioned inhibitor.",
author = "Murray, {Jennifer E.} and Walker, {Andrew W.} and Chia Li and Wells, {Nicole R.} and Penrod, {Rachel D.} and Bevins, {Rick A}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1101/lm.2177411",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "452--458",
journal = "Learning and Memory",
issn = "1072-0502",
publisher = "Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nicotine trained as a negative feature passes the retardation-of- acquisition and summation tests of a conditioned inhibitor

AU - Murray, Jennifer E.

AU - Walker, Andrew W.

AU - Li, Chia

AU - Wells, Nicole R.

AU - Penrod, Rachel D.

AU - Bevins, Rick A

PY - 2011/7/1

Y1 - 2011/7/1

N2 - Nicotine functions as a negative feature in a Pavlovian discriminated goal-tracking task. Whether withholding of responding to the conditional stimulus (CS) reflects nicotine functioning as a conditioned inhibitor is unknown. Accordingly, the present research sought to determine whether nicotine trained as a negative feature passed the retardation-of-acquisition and summation tests, thus characterizing it as a pharmacological (interoceptive) conditioned inhibitor. In the retardation test, rats received either nicotine (0.4 mg/kg) or chlordiazepoxide (5 mg/kg) negative feature training in which the drug state signaled when a 15-sec light CS would not be paired with sucrose; light was paired with sucrose on intermixed saline sessions. Following acquisition of the discrimination, both groups received nicotine CS training in which sucrose was intermittently available on nicotine but not intermixed saline sessions. Acquisition of conditioned responding to the nicotine CS was slower in the nicotine negative feature group than in the chlordiazepoxide negative feature group. In the summation test, rats were assigned to either the nicotine negative feature group or a pseudoconditioning control. In this control, the light CS was paired with sucrose on half the nicotine and half the saline sessions. Both groups also received excitatory training in which a white noise CS was paired with sucrose. The summation test consisted of presenting the white noise in conjunction with nicotine. Conditioned responding evoked by the white noise was decreased in the negative feature but not the pseudoconditioning group. Combined, the results provide the first evidence that an interoceptive stimulus (nicotine) can become a conditioned inhibitor.

AB - Nicotine functions as a negative feature in a Pavlovian discriminated goal-tracking task. Whether withholding of responding to the conditional stimulus (CS) reflects nicotine functioning as a conditioned inhibitor is unknown. Accordingly, the present research sought to determine whether nicotine trained as a negative feature passed the retardation-of-acquisition and summation tests, thus characterizing it as a pharmacological (interoceptive) conditioned inhibitor. In the retardation test, rats received either nicotine (0.4 mg/kg) or chlordiazepoxide (5 mg/kg) negative feature training in which the drug state signaled when a 15-sec light CS would not be paired with sucrose; light was paired with sucrose on intermixed saline sessions. Following acquisition of the discrimination, both groups received nicotine CS training in which sucrose was intermittently available on nicotine but not intermixed saline sessions. Acquisition of conditioned responding to the nicotine CS was slower in the nicotine negative feature group than in the chlordiazepoxide negative feature group. In the summation test, rats were assigned to either the nicotine negative feature group or a pseudoconditioning control. In this control, the light CS was paired with sucrose on half the nicotine and half the saline sessions. Both groups also received excitatory training in which a white noise CS was paired with sucrose. The summation test consisted of presenting the white noise in conjunction with nicotine. Conditioned responding evoked by the white noise was decreased in the negative feature but not the pseudoconditioning group. Combined, the results provide the first evidence that an interoceptive stimulus (nicotine) can become a conditioned inhibitor.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959389095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959389095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1101/lm.2177411

DO - 10.1101/lm.2177411

M3 - Article

C2 - 21693633

AN - SCOPUS:79959389095

VL - 18

SP - 452

EP - 458

JO - Learning and Memory

JF - Learning and Memory

SN - 1072-0502

IS - 7

ER -