Neuromuscular objectives of the human masticatory apparatus during static biting

L. R. Iwasaki, P. E. Petsche, W. D. McCall, David B Marx, J. C. Nickel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The central nervous system controls the muscles of mastication and may dictate muscle outputs according to a biologically important objective. This study tested the hypotheses that (a) the effective sagittal TMJ eminence morphology, and (b) the outputs of the masticatory muscles during static biting, are consistent with minimisation of joint loads or minimisation of muscle effort. Design: Numerical modelling predicted effective eminence morphology (from sagittal plane directions of TMJ force for centred loading over a range from molar to incisor biting) and TMJ and muscle forces during static unilateral biting in seven subjects. In vivo effective eminence morphology was measured from jaw tracking recorded from each subject. Muscle activities during biting tasks on first molar and incisor teeth were measured by electromyography using surface or indwelling electrodes. Results: Subject-specific predicted effective eminence morphology correlated with in vivo data (0.85 ≤ R 2 ≤ 0.99). Mixed and random coefficient analysis of covariance indicated good agreement between predicted and measured muscle outputs for all muscles of mastication investigated. Individual linear regression analysis showed that modelled muscle outputs accurately predicted EMG data, with average errors of 8% for molar and 15% for incisor biting. Conclusions: Effective sagittal eminence morphology was consistent with minimisation of joint loads for all subjects. Masticatory muscle outputs during unilateral biting were consistent with minimisation of joint loads or minimisation of muscle effort, or both, depending on the subject. These results are believed to be the first to test model predictions of muscle output during biting for all muscles of mastication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)767-777
Number of pages11
JournalArchives of Oral Biology
Volume48
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

Muscles
Mastication
Temporomandibular Joint
Incisor
Masticatory Muscles
Joints
Electromyography
Jaw
Linear Models
Tooth
Electrodes
Central Nervous System
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • Biting
  • EMG
  • Masticatory muscles
  • Numerical modelling
  • TMJ

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Dentistry(all)
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Iwasaki, L. R., Petsche, P. E., McCall, W. D., Marx, D. B., & Nickel, J. C. (2003). Neuromuscular objectives of the human masticatory apparatus during static biting. Archives of Oral Biology, 48(11), 767-777. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9969(03)00171-7

Neuromuscular objectives of the human masticatory apparatus during static biting. / Iwasaki, L. R.; Petsche, P. E.; McCall, W. D.; Marx, David B; Nickel, J. C.

In: Archives of Oral Biology, Vol. 48, No. 11, 01.01.2003, p. 767-777.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Iwasaki, LR, Petsche, PE, McCall, WD, Marx, DB & Nickel, JC 2003, 'Neuromuscular objectives of the human masticatory apparatus during static biting', Archives of Oral Biology, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 767-777. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9969(03)00171-7
Iwasaki, L. R. ; Petsche, P. E. ; McCall, W. D. ; Marx, David B ; Nickel, J. C. / Neuromuscular objectives of the human masticatory apparatus during static biting. In: Archives of Oral Biology. 2003 ; Vol. 48, No. 11. pp. 767-777.
@article{b25b0bce2e3c42bbbdafd7eceb8a06fe,
title = "Neuromuscular objectives of the human masticatory apparatus during static biting",
abstract = "Objective: The central nervous system controls the muscles of mastication and may dictate muscle outputs according to a biologically important objective. This study tested the hypotheses that (a) the effective sagittal TMJ eminence morphology, and (b) the outputs of the masticatory muscles during static biting, are consistent with minimisation of joint loads or minimisation of muscle effort. Design: Numerical modelling predicted effective eminence morphology (from sagittal plane directions of TMJ force for centred loading over a range from molar to incisor biting) and TMJ and muscle forces during static unilateral biting in seven subjects. In vivo effective eminence morphology was measured from jaw tracking recorded from each subject. Muscle activities during biting tasks on first molar and incisor teeth were measured by electromyography using surface or indwelling electrodes. Results: Subject-specific predicted effective eminence morphology correlated with in vivo data (0.85 ≤ R 2 ≤ 0.99). Mixed and random coefficient analysis of covariance indicated good agreement between predicted and measured muscle outputs for all muscles of mastication investigated. Individual linear regression analysis showed that modelled muscle outputs accurately predicted EMG data, with average errors of 8{\%} for molar and 15{\%} for incisor biting. Conclusions: Effective sagittal eminence morphology was consistent with minimisation of joint loads for all subjects. Masticatory muscle outputs during unilateral biting were consistent with minimisation of joint loads or minimisation of muscle effort, or both, depending on the subject. These results are believed to be the first to test model predictions of muscle output during biting for all muscles of mastication.",
keywords = "Biting, EMG, Masticatory muscles, Numerical modelling, TMJ",
author = "Iwasaki, {L. R.} and Petsche, {P. E.} and McCall, {W. D.} and Marx, {David B} and Nickel, {J. C.}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0003-9969(03)00171-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "767--777",
journal = "Archives of Oral Biology",
issn = "0003-9969",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neuromuscular objectives of the human masticatory apparatus during static biting

AU - Iwasaki, L. R.

AU - Petsche, P. E.

AU - McCall, W. D.

AU - Marx, David B

AU - Nickel, J. C.

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - Objective: The central nervous system controls the muscles of mastication and may dictate muscle outputs according to a biologically important objective. This study tested the hypotheses that (a) the effective sagittal TMJ eminence morphology, and (b) the outputs of the masticatory muscles during static biting, are consistent with minimisation of joint loads or minimisation of muscle effort. Design: Numerical modelling predicted effective eminence morphology (from sagittal plane directions of TMJ force for centred loading over a range from molar to incisor biting) and TMJ and muscle forces during static unilateral biting in seven subjects. In vivo effective eminence morphology was measured from jaw tracking recorded from each subject. Muscle activities during biting tasks on first molar and incisor teeth were measured by electromyography using surface or indwelling electrodes. Results: Subject-specific predicted effective eminence morphology correlated with in vivo data (0.85 ≤ R 2 ≤ 0.99). Mixed and random coefficient analysis of covariance indicated good agreement between predicted and measured muscle outputs for all muscles of mastication investigated. Individual linear regression analysis showed that modelled muscle outputs accurately predicted EMG data, with average errors of 8% for molar and 15% for incisor biting. Conclusions: Effective sagittal eminence morphology was consistent with minimisation of joint loads for all subjects. Masticatory muscle outputs during unilateral biting were consistent with minimisation of joint loads or minimisation of muscle effort, or both, depending on the subject. These results are believed to be the first to test model predictions of muscle output during biting for all muscles of mastication.

AB - Objective: The central nervous system controls the muscles of mastication and may dictate muscle outputs according to a biologically important objective. This study tested the hypotheses that (a) the effective sagittal TMJ eminence morphology, and (b) the outputs of the masticatory muscles during static biting, are consistent with minimisation of joint loads or minimisation of muscle effort. Design: Numerical modelling predicted effective eminence morphology (from sagittal plane directions of TMJ force for centred loading over a range from molar to incisor biting) and TMJ and muscle forces during static unilateral biting in seven subjects. In vivo effective eminence morphology was measured from jaw tracking recorded from each subject. Muscle activities during biting tasks on first molar and incisor teeth were measured by electromyography using surface or indwelling electrodes. Results: Subject-specific predicted effective eminence morphology correlated with in vivo data (0.85 ≤ R 2 ≤ 0.99). Mixed and random coefficient analysis of covariance indicated good agreement between predicted and measured muscle outputs for all muscles of mastication investigated. Individual linear regression analysis showed that modelled muscle outputs accurately predicted EMG data, with average errors of 8% for molar and 15% for incisor biting. Conclusions: Effective sagittal eminence morphology was consistent with minimisation of joint loads for all subjects. Masticatory muscle outputs during unilateral biting were consistent with minimisation of joint loads or minimisation of muscle effort, or both, depending on the subject. These results are believed to be the first to test model predictions of muscle output during biting for all muscles of mastication.

KW - Biting

KW - EMG

KW - Masticatory muscles

KW - Numerical modelling

KW - TMJ

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0142126409&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0142126409&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0003-9969(03)00171-7

DO - 10.1016/S0003-9969(03)00171-7

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 767

EP - 777

JO - Archives of Oral Biology

JF - Archives of Oral Biology

SN - 0003-9969

IS - 11

ER -