Neural correlates of conventional and harm/welfare-based moral decision-making

Stuart F White, Hui Zhao, Kelly Kimiko Leong, Judith G. Smetana, Larry P. Nucci, Robert James Blair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The degree to which social norms are processed by a unitary system or dissociable systems remains debated. Much research on children’s social-cognitive judgments has supported the distinction between “moral” (harm/welfare-based) and “conventional” norms. However, the extent to which these norms are processed by dissociable neural systems remains unclear. To address this issue, 23 healthy participants were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while they rated the wrongness of harm/welfare-based and conventional transgressions and neutral vignettes. Activation significantly greater than the neutral vignette baseline was observed in regions implicated in decision-making regions including rostral/ventral medial frontal, anterior insula and dorsomedial frontal cortices when evaluating both harm/welfare-based and social-conventional transgressions. Greater activation when rating harm/welfare-based relative to social-conventional transgressions was seen through much of ACC and bilateral inferior frontal gyrus. Greater activation was observed in superior temporal gyrus, bilateral middle temporal gyrus, left PCC, and temporal-parietal junction when rating social-conventional transgressions relative to harm/welfare-based transgressions. These data suggest that decisions regarding the wrongness of actions, irrespective of whether they involve care/harm-based or conventional transgressions, recruit regions generally implicated in affect-based decision-making. However, there is neural differentiation between harm/welfare-based and conventional transgressions. This may reflect the particular importance of processing the intent of transgressors of conventional norms and perhaps the greater emotional content or salience of harm/welfare-based transgressions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1114-1128
Number of pages15
JournalCognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience
Volume17
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

Temporal Lobe
Decision Making
Frontal Lobe
Prefrontal Cortex
Healthy Volunteers
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Research
Social Norms

Keywords

  • Decision-making
  • Moral/conventional
  • Morality
  • Theory of mind
  • fMRI

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Neural correlates of conventional and harm/welfare-based moral decision-making. / White, Stuart F; Zhao, Hui; Leong, Kelly Kimiko; Smetana, Judith G.; Nucci, Larry P.; Blair, Robert James.

In: Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, Vol. 17, No. 6, 01.12.2017, p. 1114-1128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

White, Stuart F ; Zhao, Hui ; Leong, Kelly Kimiko ; Smetana, Judith G. ; Nucci, Larry P. ; Blair, Robert James. / Neural correlates of conventional and harm/welfare-based moral decision-making. In: Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience. 2017 ; Vol. 17, No. 6. pp. 1114-1128.
@article{43698f997a2c452fb88e3aac8edc52e6,
title = "Neural correlates of conventional and harm/welfare-based moral decision-making",
abstract = "The degree to which social norms are processed by a unitary system or dissociable systems remains debated. Much research on children’s social-cognitive judgments has supported the distinction between “moral” (harm/welfare-based) and “conventional” norms. However, the extent to which these norms are processed by dissociable neural systems remains unclear. To address this issue, 23 healthy participants were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while they rated the wrongness of harm/welfare-based and conventional transgressions and neutral vignettes. Activation significantly greater than the neutral vignette baseline was observed in regions implicated in decision-making regions including rostral/ventral medial frontal, anterior insula and dorsomedial frontal cortices when evaluating both harm/welfare-based and social-conventional transgressions. Greater activation when rating harm/welfare-based relative to social-conventional transgressions was seen through much of ACC and bilateral inferior frontal gyrus. Greater activation was observed in superior temporal gyrus, bilateral middle temporal gyrus, left PCC, and temporal-parietal junction when rating social-conventional transgressions relative to harm/welfare-based transgressions. These data suggest that decisions regarding the wrongness of actions, irrespective of whether they involve care/harm-based or conventional transgressions, recruit regions generally implicated in affect-based decision-making. However, there is neural differentiation between harm/welfare-based and conventional transgressions. This may reflect the particular importance of processing the intent of transgressors of conventional norms and perhaps the greater emotional content or salience of harm/welfare-based transgressions.",
keywords = "Decision-making, Moral/conventional, Morality, Theory of mind, fMRI",
author = "White, {Stuart F} and Hui Zhao and Leong, {Kelly Kimiko} and Smetana, {Judith G.} and Nucci, {Larry P.} and Blair, {Robert James}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/s13415-017-0536-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "1114--1128",
journal = "Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience",
issn = "1530-7026",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neural correlates of conventional and harm/welfare-based moral decision-making

AU - White, Stuart F

AU - Zhao, Hui

AU - Leong, Kelly Kimiko

AU - Smetana, Judith G.

AU - Nucci, Larry P.

AU - Blair, Robert James

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - The degree to which social norms are processed by a unitary system or dissociable systems remains debated. Much research on children’s social-cognitive judgments has supported the distinction between “moral” (harm/welfare-based) and “conventional” norms. However, the extent to which these norms are processed by dissociable neural systems remains unclear. To address this issue, 23 healthy participants were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while they rated the wrongness of harm/welfare-based and conventional transgressions and neutral vignettes. Activation significantly greater than the neutral vignette baseline was observed in regions implicated in decision-making regions including rostral/ventral medial frontal, anterior insula and dorsomedial frontal cortices when evaluating both harm/welfare-based and social-conventional transgressions. Greater activation when rating harm/welfare-based relative to social-conventional transgressions was seen through much of ACC and bilateral inferior frontal gyrus. Greater activation was observed in superior temporal gyrus, bilateral middle temporal gyrus, left PCC, and temporal-parietal junction when rating social-conventional transgressions relative to harm/welfare-based transgressions. These data suggest that decisions regarding the wrongness of actions, irrespective of whether they involve care/harm-based or conventional transgressions, recruit regions generally implicated in affect-based decision-making. However, there is neural differentiation between harm/welfare-based and conventional transgressions. This may reflect the particular importance of processing the intent of transgressors of conventional norms and perhaps the greater emotional content or salience of harm/welfare-based transgressions.

AB - The degree to which social norms are processed by a unitary system or dissociable systems remains debated. Much research on children’s social-cognitive judgments has supported the distinction between “moral” (harm/welfare-based) and “conventional” norms. However, the extent to which these norms are processed by dissociable neural systems remains unclear. To address this issue, 23 healthy participants were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while they rated the wrongness of harm/welfare-based and conventional transgressions and neutral vignettes. Activation significantly greater than the neutral vignette baseline was observed in regions implicated in decision-making regions including rostral/ventral medial frontal, anterior insula and dorsomedial frontal cortices when evaluating both harm/welfare-based and social-conventional transgressions. Greater activation when rating harm/welfare-based relative to social-conventional transgressions was seen through much of ACC and bilateral inferior frontal gyrus. Greater activation was observed in superior temporal gyrus, bilateral middle temporal gyrus, left PCC, and temporal-parietal junction when rating social-conventional transgressions relative to harm/welfare-based transgressions. These data suggest that decisions regarding the wrongness of actions, irrespective of whether they involve care/harm-based or conventional transgressions, recruit regions generally implicated in affect-based decision-making. However, there is neural differentiation between harm/welfare-based and conventional transgressions. This may reflect the particular importance of processing the intent of transgressors of conventional norms and perhaps the greater emotional content or salience of harm/welfare-based transgressions.

KW - Decision-making

KW - Moral/conventional

KW - Morality

KW - Theory of mind

KW - fMRI

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029905175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029905175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/s13415-017-0536-6

DO - 10.3758/s13415-017-0536-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 28952137

AN - SCOPUS:85029905175

VL - 17

SP - 1114

EP - 1128

JO - Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience

JF - Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience

SN - 1530-7026

IS - 6

ER -