Network measures predict neuropsychological outcome after brain injury

David E. Warren, Jonathan D. Power, Joel Bruss, Natalie L. Denburg, Eric J. Waldron, Haoxin Sun, Steven E. Petersen, Daniel Tranel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

96 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hubs are network components that hold positions of high importance for network function. Previous research has identified hubs in human brain networks derived from neuroimaging data; however, there is little consensus on the localization of such hubs. Moreover, direct evidence regarding the role of various proposed hubs in network function (e.g., cognition) is scarce. Regions of the default mode network (DMN) have been frequently identified as "cortical hubs" of brain networks. On theoretical grounds, we have argued against some of the methods used to identify these hubs and have advocated alternative approaches that identify different regions of cortex as hubs. Our framework predicts that our proposed hub locations may play influential roles in multiple aspects of cognition, and, in contrast, that hubs identified via other methods (including salient regions in the DMN) might not exert such broad influence. Here we used a neuropsychological approach to directly test these predictions by studying long-term cognitive and behavioral outcomes in 30 patients, 19 with focal lesions to six "target" hubs identified by our approaches (high system density and participation coefficient) and 11 with focal lesions to two "control" hubs (high degree centrality). In support of our predictions, we found that damage to target locations produced severe and widespread cognitive deficits, whereas damage to control locations produced more circumscribed deficits. These findings support our interpretation of how neuroimaging-derived network measures relate to cognition and augment classic neuroanatomically based predictions about cognitive and behavioral outcomes after focal brain injury.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)14247-14252
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume111
Issue number39
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 30 2014

Fingerprint

Brain Injuries
Cognition
Neuroimaging
Brain
Consensus
Research

Keywords

  • Brain hubs
  • FMRI
  • Functional connectivity
  • Neuropsychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Network measures predict neuropsychological outcome after brain injury. / Warren, David E.; Power, Jonathan D.; Bruss, Joel; Denburg, Natalie L.; Waldron, Eric J.; Sun, Haoxin; Petersen, Steven E.; Tranel, Daniel.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 111, No. 39, 30.09.2014, p. 14247-14252.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Warren, David E. ; Power, Jonathan D. ; Bruss, Joel ; Denburg, Natalie L. ; Waldron, Eric J. ; Sun, Haoxin ; Petersen, Steven E. ; Tranel, Daniel. / Network measures predict neuropsychological outcome after brain injury. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2014 ; Vol. 111, No. 39. pp. 14247-14252.
@article{56646fa56ee24ab2936eee2157682527,
title = "Network measures predict neuropsychological outcome after brain injury",
abstract = "Hubs are network components that hold positions of high importance for network function. Previous research has identified hubs in human brain networks derived from neuroimaging data; however, there is little consensus on the localization of such hubs. Moreover, direct evidence regarding the role of various proposed hubs in network function (e.g., cognition) is scarce. Regions of the default mode network (DMN) have been frequently identified as {"}cortical hubs{"} of brain networks. On theoretical grounds, we have argued against some of the methods used to identify these hubs and have advocated alternative approaches that identify different regions of cortex as hubs. Our framework predicts that our proposed hub locations may play influential roles in multiple aspects of cognition, and, in contrast, that hubs identified via other methods (including salient regions in the DMN) might not exert such broad influence. Here we used a neuropsychological approach to directly test these predictions by studying long-term cognitive and behavioral outcomes in 30 patients, 19 with focal lesions to six {"}target{"} hubs identified by our approaches (high system density and participation coefficient) and 11 with focal lesions to two {"}control{"} hubs (high degree centrality). In support of our predictions, we found that damage to target locations produced severe and widespread cognitive deficits, whereas damage to control locations produced more circumscribed deficits. These findings support our interpretation of how neuroimaging-derived network measures relate to cognition and augment classic neuroanatomically based predictions about cognitive and behavioral outcomes after focal brain injury.",
keywords = "Brain hubs, FMRI, Functional connectivity, Neuropsychology",
author = "Warren, {David E.} and Power, {Jonathan D.} and Joel Bruss and Denburg, {Natalie L.} and Waldron, {Eric J.} and Haoxin Sun and Petersen, {Steven E.} and Daniel Tranel",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1322173111",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "111",
pages = "14247--14252",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "39",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Network measures predict neuropsychological outcome after brain injury

AU - Warren, David E.

AU - Power, Jonathan D.

AU - Bruss, Joel

AU - Denburg, Natalie L.

AU - Waldron, Eric J.

AU - Sun, Haoxin

AU - Petersen, Steven E.

AU - Tranel, Daniel

PY - 2014/9/30

Y1 - 2014/9/30

N2 - Hubs are network components that hold positions of high importance for network function. Previous research has identified hubs in human brain networks derived from neuroimaging data; however, there is little consensus on the localization of such hubs. Moreover, direct evidence regarding the role of various proposed hubs in network function (e.g., cognition) is scarce. Regions of the default mode network (DMN) have been frequently identified as "cortical hubs" of brain networks. On theoretical grounds, we have argued against some of the methods used to identify these hubs and have advocated alternative approaches that identify different regions of cortex as hubs. Our framework predicts that our proposed hub locations may play influential roles in multiple aspects of cognition, and, in contrast, that hubs identified via other methods (including salient regions in the DMN) might not exert such broad influence. Here we used a neuropsychological approach to directly test these predictions by studying long-term cognitive and behavioral outcomes in 30 patients, 19 with focal lesions to six "target" hubs identified by our approaches (high system density and participation coefficient) and 11 with focal lesions to two "control" hubs (high degree centrality). In support of our predictions, we found that damage to target locations produced severe and widespread cognitive deficits, whereas damage to control locations produced more circumscribed deficits. These findings support our interpretation of how neuroimaging-derived network measures relate to cognition and augment classic neuroanatomically based predictions about cognitive and behavioral outcomes after focal brain injury.

AB - Hubs are network components that hold positions of high importance for network function. Previous research has identified hubs in human brain networks derived from neuroimaging data; however, there is little consensus on the localization of such hubs. Moreover, direct evidence regarding the role of various proposed hubs in network function (e.g., cognition) is scarce. Regions of the default mode network (DMN) have been frequently identified as "cortical hubs" of brain networks. On theoretical grounds, we have argued against some of the methods used to identify these hubs and have advocated alternative approaches that identify different regions of cortex as hubs. Our framework predicts that our proposed hub locations may play influential roles in multiple aspects of cognition, and, in contrast, that hubs identified via other methods (including salient regions in the DMN) might not exert such broad influence. Here we used a neuropsychological approach to directly test these predictions by studying long-term cognitive and behavioral outcomes in 30 patients, 19 with focal lesions to six "target" hubs identified by our approaches (high system density and participation coefficient) and 11 with focal lesions to two "control" hubs (high degree centrality). In support of our predictions, we found that damage to target locations produced severe and widespread cognitive deficits, whereas damage to control locations produced more circumscribed deficits. These findings support our interpretation of how neuroimaging-derived network measures relate to cognition and augment classic neuroanatomically based predictions about cognitive and behavioral outcomes after focal brain injury.

KW - Brain hubs

KW - FMRI

KW - Functional connectivity

KW - Neuropsychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907587741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907587741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1322173111

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1322173111

M3 - Article

C2 - 25225403

AN - SCOPUS:84907587741

VL - 111

SP - 14247

EP - 14252

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 39

ER -