Neighborhood Contextual Factors, Alcohol Use, and Alcohol Problems in the United States: Evidence From a Nationally Representative Study of Young Adults

Wendy S. Slutske, Arielle R. Deutsch, Thomas M. Piasecki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is considerable variation in alcohol use and problems across the United States, suggesting that systematic regional differences might contribute to alcohol involvement. Several neighborhood contextual factors may be important aspects of this "alcohol environment." Methods: Participants were 15,197 young adults (age 18 to 26) from Wave III of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, a nationally representative U.S. survey. Measures of past-year alcohol use and problems were obtained via structured in-home interviews. Tract-level neighborhood contextual factors (density of on- and off-premises alcohol outlets, neighborhood disadvantage, rural vs. urban residence) were derived from census indicators and geocoded state-level alcohol outlet licenses. Multivariate logistic regression, ordered logistic regression, or negative binomial regression models, including age, sex, race, and household income as covariates, were fit to examine the relation of the neighborhood contextual factors with alcohol use and problems. Results: The most consistent finding across 4 of the 5 measures of alcohol involvement was their association with neighborhood advantage, the active ingredient underlying this effect was primarily the proportion of educated residents in the neighborhood. The densities of alcohol outlets were associated with any alcohol use-they were not associated with binge drinking or alcohol problems, nor could they explain any of the neighborhood advantage effects. The influence of alcohol outlet densities on alcohol involvement did not differ for those above or below the legal age to purchase alcohol. Living in a rural versus an urban neighborhood was associated with a different alcohol use pattern characterized by a lower likelihood of any drinking, but among those who drank, consuming more alcohol per occasion. Conclusions: Living in a more advantaged and educated urban neighborhood with greater densities of bars and restaurants is associated with greater alcohol involvement among 18- to 26-year-olds in the United States.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1010-1019
Number of pages10
JournalAlcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
Volume40
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2016

Fingerprint

Young Adult
Alcohols
Logistics
Logistic Models
Geographic Mapping
Binge Drinking
Restaurants
Statistical Models
Censuses
Licensure
Drinking
Longitudinal Studies

Keywords

  • Add Health
  • Alcohol Outlets
  • Alcohol Problems
  • Alcohol Use
  • Neighborhood Disadvantage
  • Rural
  • Young Adults

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Toxicology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

@article{484b67522a10450198a2d8782eca58aa,
title = "Neighborhood Contextual Factors, Alcohol Use, and Alcohol Problems in the United States: Evidence From a Nationally Representative Study of Young Adults",
abstract = "Background: There is considerable variation in alcohol use and problems across the United States, suggesting that systematic regional differences might contribute to alcohol involvement. Several neighborhood contextual factors may be important aspects of this {"}alcohol environment.{"} Methods: Participants were 15,197 young adults (age 18 to 26) from Wave III of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, a nationally representative U.S. survey. Measures of past-year alcohol use and problems were obtained via structured in-home interviews. Tract-level neighborhood contextual factors (density of on- and off-premises alcohol outlets, neighborhood disadvantage, rural vs. urban residence) were derived from census indicators and geocoded state-level alcohol outlet licenses. Multivariate logistic regression, ordered logistic regression, or negative binomial regression models, including age, sex, race, and household income as covariates, were fit to examine the relation of the neighborhood contextual factors with alcohol use and problems. Results: The most consistent finding across 4 of the 5 measures of alcohol involvement was their association with neighborhood advantage, the active ingredient underlying this effect was primarily the proportion of educated residents in the neighborhood. The densities of alcohol outlets were associated with any alcohol use-they were not associated with binge drinking or alcohol problems, nor could they explain any of the neighborhood advantage effects. The influence of alcohol outlet densities on alcohol involvement did not differ for those above or below the legal age to purchase alcohol. Living in a rural versus an urban neighborhood was associated with a different alcohol use pattern characterized by a lower likelihood of any drinking, but among those who drank, consuming more alcohol per occasion. Conclusions: Living in a more advantaged and educated urban neighborhood with greater densities of bars and restaurants is associated with greater alcohol involvement among 18- to 26-year-olds in the United States.",
keywords = "Add Health, Alcohol Outlets, Alcohol Problems, Alcohol Use, Neighborhood Disadvantage, Rural, Young Adults",
author = "Slutske, {Wendy S.} and Deutsch, {Arielle R.} and Piasecki, {Thomas M.}",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/acer.13033",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "1010--1019",
journal = "Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research",
issn = "0145-6008",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neighborhood Contextual Factors, Alcohol Use, and Alcohol Problems in the United States

T2 - Evidence From a Nationally Representative Study of Young Adults

AU - Slutske, Wendy S.

AU - Deutsch, Arielle R.

AU - Piasecki, Thomas M.

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - Background: There is considerable variation in alcohol use and problems across the United States, suggesting that systematic regional differences might contribute to alcohol involvement. Several neighborhood contextual factors may be important aspects of this "alcohol environment." Methods: Participants were 15,197 young adults (age 18 to 26) from Wave III of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, a nationally representative U.S. survey. Measures of past-year alcohol use and problems were obtained via structured in-home interviews. Tract-level neighborhood contextual factors (density of on- and off-premises alcohol outlets, neighborhood disadvantage, rural vs. urban residence) were derived from census indicators and geocoded state-level alcohol outlet licenses. Multivariate logistic regression, ordered logistic regression, or negative binomial regression models, including age, sex, race, and household income as covariates, were fit to examine the relation of the neighborhood contextual factors with alcohol use and problems. Results: The most consistent finding across 4 of the 5 measures of alcohol involvement was their association with neighborhood advantage, the active ingredient underlying this effect was primarily the proportion of educated residents in the neighborhood. The densities of alcohol outlets were associated with any alcohol use-they were not associated with binge drinking or alcohol problems, nor could they explain any of the neighborhood advantage effects. The influence of alcohol outlet densities on alcohol involvement did not differ for those above or below the legal age to purchase alcohol. Living in a rural versus an urban neighborhood was associated with a different alcohol use pattern characterized by a lower likelihood of any drinking, but among those who drank, consuming more alcohol per occasion. Conclusions: Living in a more advantaged and educated urban neighborhood with greater densities of bars and restaurants is associated with greater alcohol involvement among 18- to 26-year-olds in the United States.

AB - Background: There is considerable variation in alcohol use and problems across the United States, suggesting that systematic regional differences might contribute to alcohol involvement. Several neighborhood contextual factors may be important aspects of this "alcohol environment." Methods: Participants were 15,197 young adults (age 18 to 26) from Wave III of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, a nationally representative U.S. survey. Measures of past-year alcohol use and problems were obtained via structured in-home interviews. Tract-level neighborhood contextual factors (density of on- and off-premises alcohol outlets, neighborhood disadvantage, rural vs. urban residence) were derived from census indicators and geocoded state-level alcohol outlet licenses. Multivariate logistic regression, ordered logistic regression, or negative binomial regression models, including age, sex, race, and household income as covariates, were fit to examine the relation of the neighborhood contextual factors with alcohol use and problems. Results: The most consistent finding across 4 of the 5 measures of alcohol involvement was their association with neighborhood advantage, the active ingredient underlying this effect was primarily the proportion of educated residents in the neighborhood. The densities of alcohol outlets were associated with any alcohol use-they were not associated with binge drinking or alcohol problems, nor could they explain any of the neighborhood advantage effects. The influence of alcohol outlet densities on alcohol involvement did not differ for those above or below the legal age to purchase alcohol. Living in a rural versus an urban neighborhood was associated with a different alcohol use pattern characterized by a lower likelihood of any drinking, but among those who drank, consuming more alcohol per occasion. Conclusions: Living in a more advantaged and educated urban neighborhood with greater densities of bars and restaurants is associated with greater alcohol involvement among 18- to 26-year-olds in the United States.

KW - Add Health

KW - Alcohol Outlets

KW - Alcohol Problems

KW - Alcohol Use

KW - Neighborhood Disadvantage

KW - Rural

KW - Young Adults

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964325475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964325475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/acer.13033

DO - 10.1111/acer.13033

M3 - Article

C2 - 26996826

AN - SCOPUS:84964325475

VL - 40

SP - 1010

EP - 1019

JO - Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

JF - Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

SN - 0145-6008

IS - 5

ER -