Narrowly tailored actuarial models for affirmative action in higher education

Evelyn M. Maeder, Richard L Wiener

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous research discusses the superiority of actuarial models over clinical models in a number of areas related to accuracy and consistency in decision making. The current project sought to develop an actuarial candidate selection model for affirmative action in higher education that would achieve the goal of diversity by assigning points for a number of diversity-related characteristics in addition to standard academic admission criteria. Two experiments showed that participants who used actuarial models selected applicants with more markers of academic success and greater diversity using factors favored by recent U.S. Supreme Court cases. The second experiment showed that an unweighted actuarial model also helped decision makers select more minority student candidates and that it produced higher ratings of procedural fairness. The article discusses how an actuarial model might pass Constitutional muster in light of recent Supreme Court cases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)116-145
Number of pages30
JournalAnalyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2010

Fingerprint

affirmative action
higher education
education
Supreme Court
candidacy
experiment
academic success
applicant
fairness
decision maker
student
rating
decision making
minority

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Narrowly tailored actuarial models for affirmative action in higher education. / Maeder, Evelyn M.; Wiener, Richard L.

In: Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, Vol. 10, No. 1, 01.12.2010, p. 116-145.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bbe2a09015964ca2a96e2a308573a074,
title = "Narrowly tailored actuarial models for affirmative action in higher education",
abstract = "Previous research discusses the superiority of actuarial models over clinical models in a number of areas related to accuracy and consistency in decision making. The current project sought to develop an actuarial candidate selection model for affirmative action in higher education that would achieve the goal of diversity by assigning points for a number of diversity-related characteristics in addition to standard academic admission criteria. Two experiments showed that participants who used actuarial models selected applicants with more markers of academic success and greater diversity using factors favored by recent U.S. Supreme Court cases. The second experiment showed that an unweighted actuarial model also helped decision makers select more minority student candidates and that it produced higher ratings of procedural fairness. The article discusses how an actuarial model might pass Constitutional muster in light of recent Supreme Court cases.",
author = "Maeder, {Evelyn M.} and Wiener, {Richard L}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1530-2415.2010.01219.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "116--145",
journal = "Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy",
issn = "1529-7489",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Narrowly tailored actuarial models for affirmative action in higher education

AU - Maeder, Evelyn M.

AU - Wiener, Richard L

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - Previous research discusses the superiority of actuarial models over clinical models in a number of areas related to accuracy and consistency in decision making. The current project sought to develop an actuarial candidate selection model for affirmative action in higher education that would achieve the goal of diversity by assigning points for a number of diversity-related characteristics in addition to standard academic admission criteria. Two experiments showed that participants who used actuarial models selected applicants with more markers of academic success and greater diversity using factors favored by recent U.S. Supreme Court cases. The second experiment showed that an unweighted actuarial model also helped decision makers select more minority student candidates and that it produced higher ratings of procedural fairness. The article discusses how an actuarial model might pass Constitutional muster in light of recent Supreme Court cases.

AB - Previous research discusses the superiority of actuarial models over clinical models in a number of areas related to accuracy and consistency in decision making. The current project sought to develop an actuarial candidate selection model for affirmative action in higher education that would achieve the goal of diversity by assigning points for a number of diversity-related characteristics in addition to standard academic admission criteria. Two experiments showed that participants who used actuarial models selected applicants with more markers of academic success and greater diversity using factors favored by recent U.S. Supreme Court cases. The second experiment showed that an unweighted actuarial model also helped decision makers select more minority student candidates and that it produced higher ratings of procedural fairness. The article discusses how an actuarial model might pass Constitutional muster in light of recent Supreme Court cases.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650110501&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650110501&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2010.01219.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2010.01219.x

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 116

EP - 145

JO - Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy

JF - Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy

SN - 1529-7489

IS - 1

ER -