Narrative review: Do state laws make it easier to say "i'm sorry?"

William M. McDonnell, Elisabeth Guenther

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Initiatives intended to reduce the frequency and impact of medical errors generally rely on recognition and disclosure of medical errors. However, fear of malpractice liability is a barrier to physician disclosure. Some U.S. state legislatures have attempted to encourage physicians to disclose medical errors by enacting "apology laws." The authors reviewed the codified statutes of each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia to determine the prevalence and characteristics of such apology laws. They found that many states have recently adopted apology laws and that there is variability in these laws. The authors review some of the important differences in these laws and explore the potential impact of apology laws.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)811-815
Number of pages5
JournalAnnals of internal medicine
Volume149
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2 2008

Fingerprint

Medical Errors
Disclosure
Physicians
Malpractice
Fear

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Narrative review : Do state laws make it easier to say "i'm sorry?". / McDonnell, William M.; Guenther, Elisabeth.

In: Annals of internal medicine, Vol. 149, No. 11, 02.12.2008, p. 811-815.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

McDonnell, William M. ; Guenther, Elisabeth. / Narrative review : Do state laws make it easier to say "i'm sorry?". In: Annals of internal medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 149, No. 11. pp. 811-815.
@article{564ef9c9eed943af810917875d999d57,
title = "Narrative review: Do state laws make it easier to say {"}i'm sorry?{"}",
abstract = "Initiatives intended to reduce the frequency and impact of medical errors generally rely on recognition and disclosure of medical errors. However, fear of malpractice liability is a barrier to physician disclosure. Some U.S. state legislatures have attempted to encourage physicians to disclose medical errors by enacting {"}apology laws.{"} The authors reviewed the codified statutes of each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia to determine the prevalence and characteristics of such apology laws. They found that many states have recently adopted apology laws and that there is variability in these laws. The authors review some of the important differences in these laws and explore the potential impact of apology laws.",
author = "McDonnell, {William M.} and Elisabeth Guenther",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "2",
doi = "10.7326/0003-4819-149-11-200812020-00007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "149",
pages = "811--815",
journal = "Annals of Internal Medicine",
issn = "0003-4819",
publisher = "American College of Physicians",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Narrative review

T2 - Do state laws make it easier to say "i'm sorry?"

AU - McDonnell, William M.

AU - Guenther, Elisabeth

PY - 2008/12/2

Y1 - 2008/12/2

N2 - Initiatives intended to reduce the frequency and impact of medical errors generally rely on recognition and disclosure of medical errors. However, fear of malpractice liability is a barrier to physician disclosure. Some U.S. state legislatures have attempted to encourage physicians to disclose medical errors by enacting "apology laws." The authors reviewed the codified statutes of each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia to determine the prevalence and characteristics of such apology laws. They found that many states have recently adopted apology laws and that there is variability in these laws. The authors review some of the important differences in these laws and explore the potential impact of apology laws.

AB - Initiatives intended to reduce the frequency and impact of medical errors generally rely on recognition and disclosure of medical errors. However, fear of malpractice liability is a barrier to physician disclosure. Some U.S. state legislatures have attempted to encourage physicians to disclose medical errors by enacting "apology laws." The authors reviewed the codified statutes of each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia to determine the prevalence and characteristics of such apology laws. They found that many states have recently adopted apology laws and that there is variability in these laws. The authors review some of the important differences in these laws and explore the potential impact of apology laws.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57549099281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57549099281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7326/0003-4819-149-11-200812020-00007

DO - 10.7326/0003-4819-149-11-200812020-00007

M3 - Review article

C2 - 19047028

AN - SCOPUS:57549099281

VL - 149

SP - 811

EP - 815

JO - Annals of Internal Medicine

JF - Annals of Internal Medicine

SN - 0003-4819

IS - 11

ER -