N0/N1, PNL, or LNR? The Effect of Lymph Node Number on Accurate Survival Prediction in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Nakul P. Valsangkar, Devon M. Bush, James S. Michaelson, Cristina R. Ferrone, Jennifer A. Wargo, Keith D. Lillemoe, Carlos Fernández-del Castillo, Andrew L. Warshaw, Sarah P. Thayer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: We evaluated the prognostic accuracy of LN variables (N0/N1), numbers of positive lymph nodes (PLN), and lymph node ratio (LNR) in the context of the total number of examined lymph nodes (ELN). Methods: Patients from SEER and a single institution (MGH) were reviewed and survival analyses performed in subgroups based on numbers of ELN to calculate excess risk of death (hazard ratio, HR). Results: In SEER and MGH, higher numbers of ELN improved the overall survival for N0 patients. The prognostic significance (N0/N1) and PLN were too variable as the importance of a single PLN depended on the total number of LN dissected. LNR consistently correlated with survival once a certain number of lymph nodes were dissected (≥13 in SEER and ≥17 in the MGH dataset). Conclusions: Better survival for N0 patients with increasing ELN likely represents improved staging. PLN have some predictive value but the ELN strongly influence their impact on survival, suggesting the need for a ratio-based classification. LNR strongly correlates with outcome provided that a certain number of lymph nodes is evaluated, suggesting that the prognostic accuracy of any LN variable depends on the total number of ELN.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)257-266
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Adenocarcinoma
Lymph Nodes
Survival
Survival Analysis

Keywords

  • Lymph node ratio
  • Pancreatic cancer
  • Staging
  • Survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

N0/N1, PNL, or LNR? The Effect of Lymph Node Number on Accurate Survival Prediction in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. / Valsangkar, Nakul P.; Bush, Devon M.; Michaelson, James S.; Ferrone, Cristina R.; Wargo, Jennifer A.; Lillemoe, Keith D.; Fernández-del Castillo, Carlos; Warshaw, Andrew L.; Thayer, Sarah P.

In: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Vol. 17, No. 2, 01.01.2013, p. 257-266.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Valsangkar, NP, Bush, DM, Michaelson, JS, Ferrone, CR, Wargo, JA, Lillemoe, KD, Fernández-del Castillo, C, Warshaw, AL & Thayer, SP 2013, 'N0/N1, PNL, or LNR? The Effect of Lymph Node Number on Accurate Survival Prediction in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma', Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 257-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1974-7
Valsangkar, Nakul P. ; Bush, Devon M. ; Michaelson, James S. ; Ferrone, Cristina R. ; Wargo, Jennifer A. ; Lillemoe, Keith D. ; Fernández-del Castillo, Carlos ; Warshaw, Andrew L. ; Thayer, Sarah P. / N0/N1, PNL, or LNR? The Effect of Lymph Node Number on Accurate Survival Prediction in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. In: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2013 ; Vol. 17, No. 2. pp. 257-266.
@article{f2b1d5c4dbf34ae7be47fe31a5d89665,
title = "N0/N1, PNL, or LNR? The Effect of Lymph Node Number on Accurate Survival Prediction in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma",
abstract = "Introduction: We evaluated the prognostic accuracy of LN variables (N0/N1), numbers of positive lymph nodes (PLN), and lymph node ratio (LNR) in the context of the total number of examined lymph nodes (ELN). Methods: Patients from SEER and a single institution (MGH) were reviewed and survival analyses performed in subgroups based on numbers of ELN to calculate excess risk of death (hazard ratio, HR). Results: In SEER and MGH, higher numbers of ELN improved the overall survival for N0 patients. The prognostic significance (N0/N1) and PLN were too variable as the importance of a single PLN depended on the total number of LN dissected. LNR consistently correlated with survival once a certain number of lymph nodes were dissected (≥13 in SEER and ≥17 in the MGH dataset). Conclusions: Better survival for N0 patients with increasing ELN likely represents improved staging. PLN have some predictive value but the ELN strongly influence their impact on survival, suggesting the need for a ratio-based classification. LNR strongly correlates with outcome provided that a certain number of lymph nodes is evaluated, suggesting that the prognostic accuracy of any LN variable depends on the total number of ELN.",
keywords = "Lymph node ratio, Pancreatic cancer, Staging, Survival",
author = "Valsangkar, {Nakul P.} and Bush, {Devon M.} and Michaelson, {James S.} and Ferrone, {Cristina R.} and Wargo, {Jennifer A.} and Lillemoe, {Keith D.} and {Fern{\'a}ndez-del Castillo}, Carlos and Warshaw, {Andrew L.} and Thayer, {Sarah P.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11605-012-1974-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "257--266",
journal = "Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery",
issn = "1091-255X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - N0/N1, PNL, or LNR? The Effect of Lymph Node Number on Accurate Survival Prediction in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

AU - Valsangkar, Nakul P.

AU - Bush, Devon M.

AU - Michaelson, James S.

AU - Ferrone, Cristina R.

AU - Wargo, Jennifer A.

AU - Lillemoe, Keith D.

AU - Fernández-del Castillo, Carlos

AU - Warshaw, Andrew L.

AU - Thayer, Sarah P.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Introduction: We evaluated the prognostic accuracy of LN variables (N0/N1), numbers of positive lymph nodes (PLN), and lymph node ratio (LNR) in the context of the total number of examined lymph nodes (ELN). Methods: Patients from SEER and a single institution (MGH) were reviewed and survival analyses performed in subgroups based on numbers of ELN to calculate excess risk of death (hazard ratio, HR). Results: In SEER and MGH, higher numbers of ELN improved the overall survival for N0 patients. The prognostic significance (N0/N1) and PLN were too variable as the importance of a single PLN depended on the total number of LN dissected. LNR consistently correlated with survival once a certain number of lymph nodes were dissected (≥13 in SEER and ≥17 in the MGH dataset). Conclusions: Better survival for N0 patients with increasing ELN likely represents improved staging. PLN have some predictive value but the ELN strongly influence their impact on survival, suggesting the need for a ratio-based classification. LNR strongly correlates with outcome provided that a certain number of lymph nodes is evaluated, suggesting that the prognostic accuracy of any LN variable depends on the total number of ELN.

AB - Introduction: We evaluated the prognostic accuracy of LN variables (N0/N1), numbers of positive lymph nodes (PLN), and lymph node ratio (LNR) in the context of the total number of examined lymph nodes (ELN). Methods: Patients from SEER and a single institution (MGH) were reviewed and survival analyses performed in subgroups based on numbers of ELN to calculate excess risk of death (hazard ratio, HR). Results: In SEER and MGH, higher numbers of ELN improved the overall survival for N0 patients. The prognostic significance (N0/N1) and PLN were too variable as the importance of a single PLN depended on the total number of LN dissected. LNR consistently correlated with survival once a certain number of lymph nodes were dissected (≥13 in SEER and ≥17 in the MGH dataset). Conclusions: Better survival for N0 patients with increasing ELN likely represents improved staging. PLN have some predictive value but the ELN strongly influence their impact on survival, suggesting the need for a ratio-based classification. LNR strongly correlates with outcome provided that a certain number of lymph nodes is evaluated, suggesting that the prognostic accuracy of any LN variable depends on the total number of ELN.

KW - Lymph node ratio

KW - Pancreatic cancer

KW - Staging

KW - Survival

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872602453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872602453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11605-012-1974-7

DO - 10.1007/s11605-012-1974-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 23229885

AN - SCOPUS:84872602453

VL - 17

SP - 257

EP - 266

JO - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

JF - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

SN - 1091-255X

IS - 2

ER -