Multi-crew responses to a structure fire: Challenges of multiteam systems in a tragic fire response context

John Crowe, Joseph A. Allen, Bill Bowes

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Originality/value - This chapter provides a real-world example of a disaster and systematically analyzes the steps and decisions that were utilized during the process from a multiteam perspective. Hopefully, the analysis of the case presented here will assist in developing increased awareness during high-stress encounters and offer an unbiased evaluation of what is required to properly train and therefore mitigate such tragedies in the future.

Purpose - This chapter provides an overview of the case and draws attention to the types of teams who respond to disasters, specifically a structure fire. We then provide a detailed recounting of the case, what resources were at play, and how the incident resolved.

Design/methods/approach - There have been a number of case studies that have documented the challenges organizations face in monitoring complex and turbulent environments and the anomalous events that characterize them combined with multiteam systems' unique combination of intricacy, propensity toward hazards, and necessary team cohesion makes it particularly difficult to foreshadow - and subsequently train for - all possible contingencies. The majority of the cases reported here is based on the official National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health report that occurred shortly after the event and which is a required investigation by both State and Federal laws. Although the report is publicly available, specific identifying information was removed to allow for ease of comparison and to emphasize the multiteam system processes of interest.

Findings - As outlined in the case study above, there are many challenges that were faced in this multiteam system response to the supermarket structure fire. We discuss the response of the multiteam systems and attempt to identify a few key areas where miss-steps occurred and how the response would be different when multiteam systems function properly. We conclude with some practical implications from the incident as well as how multiteam systems can be improved based on this case study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)205-219
Number of pages15
JournalResearch on Managing Groups and Teams
Volume16
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Incidents
Train
Disaster
Propensity
Monitoring
Supermarkets
Occupational safety and health
Evaluation
Team cohesion
Resources
Contingency
Hazard

Keywords

  • After-action review
  • Disaster mitigation
  • High-reliability organization
  • Multiteam response
  • Safety
  • Trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Multi-crew responses to a structure fire : Challenges of multiteam systems in a tragic fire response context. / Crowe, John; Allen, Joseph A.; Bowes, Bill.

In: Research on Managing Groups and Teams, Vol. 16, 01.01.2014, p. 205-219.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{59514b17ec5740ac8aaec3ef9900e745,
title = "Multi-crew responses to a structure fire: Challenges of multiteam systems in a tragic fire response context",
abstract = "Originality/value - This chapter provides a real-world example of a disaster and systematically analyzes the steps and decisions that were utilized during the process from a multiteam perspective. Hopefully, the analysis of the case presented here will assist in developing increased awareness during high-stress encounters and offer an unbiased evaluation of what is required to properly train and therefore mitigate such tragedies in the future.Purpose - This chapter provides an overview of the case and draws attention to the types of teams who respond to disasters, specifically a structure fire. We then provide a detailed recounting of the case, what resources were at play, and how the incident resolved.Design/methods/approach - There have been a number of case studies that have documented the challenges organizations face in monitoring complex and turbulent environments and the anomalous events that characterize them combined with multiteam systems' unique combination of intricacy, propensity toward hazards, and necessary team cohesion makes it particularly difficult to foreshadow - and subsequently train for - all possible contingencies. The majority of the cases reported here is based on the official National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health report that occurred shortly after the event and which is a required investigation by both State and Federal laws. Although the report is publicly available, specific identifying information was removed to allow for ease of comparison and to emphasize the multiteam system processes of interest.Findings - As outlined in the case study above, there are many challenges that were faced in this multiteam system response to the supermarket structure fire. We discuss the response of the multiteam systems and attempt to identify a few key areas where miss-steps occurred and how the response would be different when multiteam systems function properly. We conclude with some practical implications from the incident as well as how multiteam systems can be improved based on this case study.",
keywords = "After-action review, Disaster mitigation, High-reliability organization, Multiteam response, Safety, Trauma",
author = "John Crowe and Allen, {Joseph A.} and Bill Bowes",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/S1534-085620140000016009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "205--219",
journal = "Research on Managing Groups and Teams",
issn = "1534-0856",
publisher = "JAI Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multi-crew responses to a structure fire

T2 - Challenges of multiteam systems in a tragic fire response context

AU - Crowe, John

AU - Allen, Joseph A.

AU - Bowes, Bill

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Originality/value - This chapter provides a real-world example of a disaster and systematically analyzes the steps and decisions that were utilized during the process from a multiteam perspective. Hopefully, the analysis of the case presented here will assist in developing increased awareness during high-stress encounters and offer an unbiased evaluation of what is required to properly train and therefore mitigate such tragedies in the future.Purpose - This chapter provides an overview of the case and draws attention to the types of teams who respond to disasters, specifically a structure fire. We then provide a detailed recounting of the case, what resources were at play, and how the incident resolved.Design/methods/approach - There have been a number of case studies that have documented the challenges organizations face in monitoring complex and turbulent environments and the anomalous events that characterize them combined with multiteam systems' unique combination of intricacy, propensity toward hazards, and necessary team cohesion makes it particularly difficult to foreshadow - and subsequently train for - all possible contingencies. The majority of the cases reported here is based on the official National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health report that occurred shortly after the event and which is a required investigation by both State and Federal laws. Although the report is publicly available, specific identifying information was removed to allow for ease of comparison and to emphasize the multiteam system processes of interest.Findings - As outlined in the case study above, there are many challenges that were faced in this multiteam system response to the supermarket structure fire. We discuss the response of the multiteam systems and attempt to identify a few key areas where miss-steps occurred and how the response would be different when multiteam systems function properly. We conclude with some practical implications from the incident as well as how multiteam systems can be improved based on this case study.

AB - Originality/value - This chapter provides a real-world example of a disaster and systematically analyzes the steps and decisions that were utilized during the process from a multiteam perspective. Hopefully, the analysis of the case presented here will assist in developing increased awareness during high-stress encounters and offer an unbiased evaluation of what is required to properly train and therefore mitigate such tragedies in the future.Purpose - This chapter provides an overview of the case and draws attention to the types of teams who respond to disasters, specifically a structure fire. We then provide a detailed recounting of the case, what resources were at play, and how the incident resolved.Design/methods/approach - There have been a number of case studies that have documented the challenges organizations face in monitoring complex and turbulent environments and the anomalous events that characterize them combined with multiteam systems' unique combination of intricacy, propensity toward hazards, and necessary team cohesion makes it particularly difficult to foreshadow - and subsequently train for - all possible contingencies. The majority of the cases reported here is based on the official National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health report that occurred shortly after the event and which is a required investigation by both State and Federal laws. Although the report is publicly available, specific identifying information was removed to allow for ease of comparison and to emphasize the multiteam system processes of interest.Findings - As outlined in the case study above, there are many challenges that were faced in this multiteam system response to the supermarket structure fire. We discuss the response of the multiteam systems and attempt to identify a few key areas where miss-steps occurred and how the response would be different when multiteam systems function properly. We conclude with some practical implications from the incident as well as how multiteam systems can be improved based on this case study.

KW - After-action review

KW - Disaster mitigation

KW - High-reliability organization

KW - Multiteam response

KW - Safety

KW - Trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911453229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84911453229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/S1534-085620140000016009

DO - 10.1108/S1534-085620140000016009

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84911453229

VL - 16

SP - 205

EP - 219

JO - Research on Managing Groups and Teams

JF - Research on Managing Groups and Teams

SN - 1534-0856

ER -